Private

FS 3.156

To move or stay behind is the question

Details

  • Full Title

    FS 3.156: Move or stay behind? Migration as adaptation in the context of climate change in the Hindu Kush Himalaya
  • Scheduled

    Talks:
    2025-09-17, 13:30 - 15:00 (LT), Theologie – SR VI
  • Convener

    Binaya Pasakhala
  • Assigned to Synthesis Workshop

    ---
  • Thematic Focus

    Adaptation, Equality, Migration, Mobility, Policy, Sustainable Development
  • Keywords

    Migration, Stay behind, Adaptation, Climate change, Hindu Kush Himalaya

Description

Migration has been an important livelihood strategy of communities living in the Hindu Kush Himalaya region. The evidence shows that there are muti-dimensional drivers of migration, such as economic and environmental factors. In-situ responses are becoming inadequate or no longer viable due to increasing climate variability and extreme climatic events. This has intensified migration in the region resulting in social, economic, ecological and political impacts at both origins and destinations. However, migration is not an option for everyone, because social, cultural and economic barriers significantly limit one’s ability to move. The policy discourse and mainstream media in the region often portray migration as challenge. Such efforts can be counterproductive, increasing exposure of communities, particularly marginalized communities, to growing climate crisis at origins as well as destinations. The outcomes of migration for left behind and migrant populations vary widely, significantly differentiated by gender and other contextual social markers. It is crucial to understand who decides to migrate or stay behind and under what conditions migration can be an adaptation or improve adaptive capacity. Therefore, this open session invites researchers, and practitioners from diverse disciplines to bridge knowledge gaps and inform current policies and practices that better support people who choose to remain or leave in the mountains. The selected presentations will be primary research adopting different types of qualitative and quantitative methods, with an emphasis on the co-creation techniques diverse stakeholders.

Registered Abstracts

ID: 3.9117
Talk/Oral
|Maharjan, Amina
Maharjan, Amina
Sustaining indigenous institution through climate and social uncertainties: Tale of two high mountain communities from Western Nepal
Maharjan, Amina
Pasakhala, Binaya; Joshi, Srijana; Basnet, Sunayana; Lama, Paljor; Bhattarai, Ishwari; Gurung, Janita
Abstract/Description

Many settlements in the high mountain areas of the Hindu Kush Himalayan (HKH) region are often remote and marginalised but are inhabited by Indigenous communities who have developed unique practices to manage their natural resources based on local ecology and societal needs. In the Limi Valley and Kagbeni of western Nepal, Indigenous institutions that governs natural resources is deeply rooted in local history, culture and religion. Over the last two of decades, the local community has experienced a range of environmental and socio-economic changes, particularly climate change and migration, which have implications on Indigenous institutions. This study explores the social, economic, and cultural factors affecting the sustainability of the Indigenous institution, while identifying opportunities with policy implications. It draws on interviews and group discussions with community members of the Limi and Kagbeni and other stakeholders about climate change, migration, and their implications on functioning of the institution. Additionally, observations by the author team through repeated visits to the two communities also informed the study findings. The study findings highlight that increasing disaster risks such as floods, and rockfalls threaten cultural heritage and local livelihoods. Furthermore, youth outmigration for education or economic opportunities, and an increasingly ageing population poses serious challenges to maintaining the functioning of the traditional institution. However, the multi-local livelihood opportunities within and nearby areas have evolved as an adaptation strategy that have encouraged youth to return and engage in and sustaining the Indigenous institution. Place attachment, social bonding and cultural identity were major influencing factors among elderly population and youth to stay behind. The Indigenous institution is central to the identity of the both communities and their governance system, therefore, policy interventions need to recognize and support such Indigenous institutions to effectively address local livelihoods and climate challenges.

ID: 3.11429
Talk/Oral
|Abbing, Robin
Abbing, Robin
Staying despite multi-hazard risk: Photovoice stories from upland Nepal
Abbing, Robin
Maharjan, Amina
Abstract/Description

Why do people stay in areas of increasing natural hazard risk? This study focuses on risk perceptions and migration decision-making in a multi-hazard context of upland Nepal. Since the catastrophic earthquake of 2015, the landscape of many valleys in northern Nepal have become increasingly unstable, resulting in recurring landslides, floods and rockfall events. Additionally, climate change is accelerating glacier retreat in the whole of the Hindu Kush Himalayas, heightening the risk of glacial-lake outburst floods (GLOFs).

In this high-risk setting, the study used qualitative and participatory methods to study the lived experiences and perceptions of natural hazards among the residents of a village in the Bhote Koshi valley. Using Photovoice, in-depth interviews and focus group discussions, complex mobility dilemmas were revealed: while most residents are highly aware of the increasing risks, many also feel deeply attached to their land, often resulting in a state of immobility. Notably, those who remain are predominantly the most financially vulnerable, or are constrained by age, gender or class and caste in their mobility potential (motility).

Yet, to categorise this as ‘involuntary immobility’ or ‘acquiescent immobility’ proved inadequate and overly simplistic, as it does not fully capture the residents’ experiences. Rather, their immobility is the outcome of a combination of both positive and negative factors and exists on a continuum between choice and inevitability– or ‘voluntary’ and ‘forced’ as often used in (im)mobility literature.

The findings of this study question the practical applicability of (im)mobility categorisations as conceptualised through the aspirations-capabilities framework. They emphasise the need for a more nuanced understanding of immobility that is rooted in human experience. Such insights are vital to informing inclusive policymaking that enhances the mobility potential and adaptive capacity of people who remain in places exposed to high environmental risk.