SNP, Hans Lozza

FS 3.123

Challenges and Solutions in Alpine Protected Areas

Details

  • Full Title

    FS 3.123: Addressing Challenges and Exploring Solutions in Alpine Protected Areas
  • Scheduled

    Talks:
    2025-09-15, 16:00 - 17:30 (LT), SOWI – SR 1
  • Co-Conveners

  • Assigned to Synthesis Workshop

    ---
  • Thematic Focus

    Conservation, Ecosystems, Policy, Sustainable Development
  • Keywords

    Alpine Protected Areas, Climate Change, Ecosystems

Description

The content was (partly) adapted by AI

Alpine protected areas face unique environmental pressures, including the impacts of climate change, land use pressure, increasing human activities, which collectively threaten biodiversity, ecosystems and conservation objectives. Renewable energy development adds to these pressures. This session will explore innovative research, adaptive management strategies, and collaborative approaches to enhance the resilience and long-term sustainability of vital mountain ecosystems. Bringing together researchers and conservation practitioners, the session will address pressing issues like climate-driven species range shifts, habitat fragmentation, renewable energy infrastructure, or pollution impacts. Case studies from the Alps and other mountain regions will illustrate adaptive management, restoration projects, and monitoring practices used to assess ecosystem health. Collaboration and stakeholder engagement will be highlighted as critical to effective alpine conservation, involving partnerships with local communities, stakeholders, and policymakers, and using tools such as remote sensing and data-driven decision-making. Through real-life examples and discussing common challenges, this session aims to foster dialogue on practical solutions that balance ecological conservation with sustainable use, ensuring that Alpine protected areas continue to thrive in the face of ongoing environmental pressures. Furthermore, the session will address the needs and way forward for future research in protected areas, identifying critical knowledge gaps, emerging methodologies, and interdisciplinary approaches that inform more effective conservation policies and practices.

Registered Abstracts

ID: 3.8293

Making sense of ecological restoration experiments in alpine protected areas: The Case of Man-Made Slopes

Taina Lemoine
Arpin, Isabelle; Lavorel, Sandra; Evette, André; Guerrin, Joana; Morel, Camille

Abstract/Description

Ecological restoration remains relatively under-utilised in the French Alpine national parks compared to other conservation measures. However, many areas within both the core and buffer zones of these parks have been significantly transformed by human activities. The construction of buildings, ski runs, roads, and trails for tourism, pastoralism, and forestry has resulted in the proliferation of man-made slopes at ever higher altitudes and on steeper terrain. These slopes are often unstable and devoid of vegetation, posing serious challenges in terms of safety, biodiversity loss, and landscape degradation.

For over a century, civil engineering solutions have dominated efforts to stabilise these slopes and control erosion. More recently, however, ecological restoration approaches—particularly those using soil bioengineering techniques informed by plant ecology and ecosystem science—have begun to emerge as alternatives. Our research seeks to understand how these initiatives are perceived and implemented by key stakeholders through the lens of sensemaking.

This study is conducted within a living lab dedicated to the development of nature-based solutions in Les Trois Vallées, within the Vanoise National Park (French Alps). Using semi-structured interviews and participant observation, we are engaging with a wide range of stakeholders, including protected area managers, ski resort operators, researchers, conservationists, farming and forestry professionals, and local authorities. We expect to uncover a variety of ways of making sense of ecological restoration in protected areas, leading to both synergies and tensions—within park staff and between different stakeholders. These insights will contribute to a broader understanding of how ecological restoration is framed, negotiated, and integrated into alpine conservation strategies.

ID: 3.8329

Co-producing future scenarios for nature restoration and socio-ecological connectivity in mountain landscapes

Alberto González-García
Neyret, Margot; López-Tejedor, Adrian; Prima, Marie-Caroline; Si-Moussi, Sara; Bruley, Enora; Lavorel, Sandra

Abstract/Description

The new European Nature Restoration Law presents a key opportunity to enhance ecological and socio-ecological connectivity. In the Grenoble region, a complex mountain landscape, we explored how different restoration, conservation, and ecosystem management actions could influence connectivity dynamics around protected areas. Building on prior analyses of spatial bundles of ecosystem services, derived from 12 quantified services using spatial models and grouped by social values, we identified areas with low ecosystem service supply and engaged 15 key territorial stakeholders in a participatory process to co-develop future landscape reconnection scenarios with special focus on protected areas. In the first workshop, stakeholders proposed landscape changes to improve ecological connectivity and ecosystem service provision. Based on these inputs, we developed new land-use scenarios, which were then presented and validated in a second workshop. Finally, these scenarios were evaluated to assess their impact on socio-ecological connectivity and the transmission of ecosystem services from protected areas to surrounding landscapes through their borders.

ID: 3.8886

Enhancing ecological networks between protected areas in the Alps: Investigations for connectivity conservation by spatial planning

Peter Laner
Pilati, Alessia; Omizzolo, Andrea; Favilli, Filippo

Abstract/Description

Functioning ecological corridors between protected areas are fundamental for biodiversity. However, the integration of conservation measures in landscapes outside protected areas in the Alpine spatial planning systems is lacking and pressures of human activities are increasing, such as the recent acceleration in the renewable energy development. Therefore, the Interreg Alpine Space “PlanToConnect” project recently has developed a model for a coherent ecological network of protected areas in the Alps and demonstrated how it can be broken down to regional and local scales.
Based on the existing approach of the Continuum Suitability Index and Strategic Alpine Connectivity Areas, a structural ecological network model to connect protected areas and highly natural areas in the Alps was elaborated by a least-cost-path analysis. The model was used in the study region South Tyrol study, and it was cross-checked with a regional GIS model for red deer. First verifications of the linkages were conducted by site visits and tracking snow trails on local level.
Results on macro-level show that 8,1% of highly permeable areas in the EUSALP territory, which are suitable for connectivity conservation, are not protected. 640 out of 953 ecological linkages fulfil criteria for creating a coherent network. The expected upcoming pressure of solar panels fields is affecting 194 linkages, while ten have already been seriously impaired.
For a provincial connectivity concept in South Tyrol, five high priority linkages were derived from the alpine model. One key connection is the area between the nature parks of Fanes – Sennes – Braies and Vedrette di Ries – Aurina. The snow tracking verification shows first signs that the areas is used as passage for wildlife species. To improve and secure the permeability for them, over – or underpass construction would be needed in this area. The designation as wildlife corridor in municipal landscape plans is lacking and would be required for its conservation.
The analysis presented offer tools for planning administrations to facilitate transboundary efforts and enhance ecological networks at both regional and local levels.

ID: 3.9616

Co-constructing Nature-Based Solutions Deployment Scenarios with Local Stakeholders: A Living Lab Approach in the French Alps

Nicolas Elleaume
Morel, Camille; Busseti, Fanny; Lavorel, Sandra

Abstract/Description

Nature-based Solutions (NbS) are increasingly recognized as key levers for climate change adaptation, offering benefits for both biodiversity and society—economic, cultural, and beyond—while enhancing socio-ecosystem resilience. However, their widespread adoption is often hindered by a lack of collaborative frameworks, which have been shown to play a crucial role in increasing NbS acceptance and preventing conflicts over their deployment within socio-ecosystems. Addressing this challenge requires approaches that foster co-construction with local stakeholders, ensuring that proposed solutions align with territorial specificities and community expectations. Living Labs, with their transdisciplinary and participatory research methodologies, provide valuable support in overcoming these barriers by creating structured spaces for dialogue, experimentation, and shared learning. In the Pays de la Meije (French Alps), the VivAlp Living Lab served as a framework for organizing a series of workshops where we aimed to: (1) co-identify candidate NbS and (2) co-construct evaluation criteria to guide their deployment, in collaboration with local stakeholders and residents. Our objective is to develop NbS deployment scenarios that account for both local constraints and adaptation goals, as defined through the co-construction process. Among the NbS considered, two were particularly targeted: the planting of hedgerows and trees, and the maintenance of mown meadows in future landscape management. Our participatory modeling approach relies on three key components: (1) mapping ecosystem services to inform local current and future needs, (2) identifying spatial and socio-economic constraints within the landscape (e.g., linked to agricultural practices), and (3) eliciting stakeholder preferences regarding NbS benefits and trade-offs. By integrating this information, we developed a set of scenarios that directly address local needs, constraints, and preferences. These outcomes provide concrete guidance on optimal NbS deployment locations, helping to bridge the gap between conceptual discussions and actionable implementation. They also serve as a valuable basis for structuring future discussions on funding mechanisms, governance, and long-term monitoring, ensuring that NbS integration into the landscape is both effective and well-supported.

ID: 3.12213

Land-use change in the European Alps: a century of post-abandonment forest dynamics

Matteo Garbarino
Anselmetto, Nicolò; Bayle, Arthur; Bürgi, Matthias; Choler, Philippe; Ciolli, Marco; Delpouve, Noémie; Eckert, Nicolas; Giacona, Florie; Hohensinner, Severin; Jemec, Luka; Kobal, Milan; Lieskovsky, Juraj; Nguyen, Thien-Anh; Rathgeber, Cyrille B. K.; Schirpke, Uta; Tappeiner, Ulrike; Tasser, Erich; Tattoni, Clara; Tuia, Devis

Abstract/Description

Natural reforestation through secondary succession is one of the dominant ecological processes in mountain areas of developed countries. Given its complexity and variability, a harmonized approach for data collection and landscape-scale analysis is needed. Within the GeoLUCA project, we collected 114 case studies from the European Alps (50,000 km2) across six countries (Austria, France, Germany, Italy, Slovenia, Switzerland) spanning from the first half of the 19th century to 2022. We selected the European Alps as representative of the heterogeneous global change effects on forests due to the availability of LULCC data since the 19th century. We harmonized the LULCC data derived from historical cadasters (1800s), aerial photos (1950s-1980s-2020s), and satellite imagery (2000s-2020s) to obtain binary forest/non-forest gridded maps at a 10-m spatial resolution. Our aim was to identify the most important socio-ecological drivers of reforestation and discuss implications for planners and managers. We adopted change detection analyses, landscape metrics, and multivariate statistical models to understand landscape dynamics and quantify the role of drivers. Natural reforestation after abandonment in the European Alps was observed in all case studies, but with high local-scale heterogeneity. Climate and land-use abandonment were the dominant drivers of reforestation patterns. Reforestation rate was greatest on south-facing slopes of dry landscapes within remote and sparsely populated municipalities. The GeoLUCA geodatabase proved to be fundamental to capture the nonlinearity of past land-use/cover change over an area dominated by strong topographic gradients and extreme heterogeneity in socio-economic spatial patterns. We plan to adopt such a collection as a starting point for several ecological studies in the mountain range, such as treeline dynamics, species distribution, and ecosystem service characterization.

ID: 3.13439

Subnational reporting on mountain biodiversity protection

Mark Alexander Snethlage
Urbach, Davnah; Geschke, Jonas; Fischer, Markus

Abstract/Description

The importance of mountain biodiversity protection and sustainable management is undisputed. With SDG indicator 15.4.1 on the coverage by protected areas of important sites for mountain biodiversity and with new targets agreed upon in the Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework, needs and opportunities exist for meaningful reporting on mountain biodiversity protection. In providing SDG indicator 15.4.1 on mountain biodiversity protection for individual mountain ranges, we show that national-level indicators of mountain biodiversity protection provide little information at conservation-relevant scales and that reporting at subnational level is critical for the sustainable management of mountain ecosystems and for a meaningful interpretation of national values. Our work on SDG indicator 15.4.1 further highlights the need for transparency and caution with regard to the methods and assumptions underlying metrics for informing on ecosystem and biodiversity protection. Based on national and global datasets of mountain biodiversity monitoring efforts, which we map onto the ranges of the most recent GMBA mountain inventory, we also show that major gaps exist in the data available for reliable reporting on mountain biodiversity. We specifically show that even in mountain countries generally rich in environmental data, such as Switzerland, gaps in the monitoring of mountain ecosystems are numerous and large and undermine our ability to detect rapid changes in biodiversity. We argue that reliable reporting on global biodiversity-related targets at scale is not realistic unless we achieve improved spatiotemporal monitoring of mountain biodiversity and ecosystems. We further share examples of online resources to support science-based decision-making for complex mountain environments and the correct interpretation of the metrics on which decisions and management are based.

ID: 3.10006

Mountain Protected Areas as a Tool for Sustainable Development in Southern Dinaric Alps

Taulant Doli

Abstract/Description

Mountain protected areas (MPAs) in the Dinaric Alps represent some of Europe’s untouched wilderness areas, characterized by rich biodiversity, cultural heterogeneity, and low levels of anthropogenic disturbance. These protected areas possess significant socio-economic potential, particularly for revitalizing rural communities facing economic stagnation, migration, and limited job opportunities. This study is focused on the southern part of the Dinaric Alps, along the borders of Albania, Kosovo, and Montenegro and aims to examine the management practices employed within national parks. Central to this analysis are landscape transformations and the various factors driving these changes, as well as the influence of local cultural traditions and identities on conservation efforts and land-use planning. These national parks are relatively recently recognised and face several challenges, including legal ambiguities, sustainable management, and conflicts among diverse stakeholder groups, especially between tourism development and conservation priorities. As national policies and regional development strategies evolve, the functional role of protected areas is being reinterpreted, impacting local economies and community livelihoods. Addressing these complex issues requires a holistic, transboundary approach that bridges cultural, political, and economic boundaries within the region. Integrating top-down approaches with participatory, bottom-up approaches may offer a pathway to more sustainable and inclusive management, fostering socio-economic development while maintaining ecological integrity. The initial phase of this research focuses on discussing these thematic areas, laying the foundation for further empirical investigations into landscape change, stakeholder engagement, and policy integration. This study aims to contribute to a deeper understanding of how these protected areas can serve as effective tools for balancing ecological conservation with sustainable regional development, promoting resilience and prosperity in mountain communities.