Impact of spectral resolution on automated surface classification at Mendenhall glacier, Alaska

Abstract ID: 3.11317 | Accepted as Poster | Poster | TBA | TBA

Lea Hartl (0)
Schmitt, Carl (2), Stuefer, Martin (2), Rajabi, Roozbeh (2), Di Mauro, Biagio (3), Winiwarter, Lukas (4)
Lea Hartl (1)
Schmitt, Carl (2), Stuefer, Martin (2), Rajabi, Roozbeh (2), Di Mauro, Biagio (3), Winiwarter, Lukas (4)

1
(1) Institute for Interdisciplinary Mountain Research, Austria Academy of Sciences
(2) HyLab, Geophysical Institute, Universty of Alaska Fairbanks, USA
(3) Istituto di Scienze Polari, Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche , Milano, Italy
(4) Unit of Geometry and Surveying, Faculty of Engineering Sciences, Universität Innsbruck, Austria

(1) Institute for Interdisciplinary Mountain Research, Austria Academy of Sciences
(2) HyLab, Geophysical Institute, Universty of Alaska Fairbanks, USA
(3) Istituto di Scienze Polari, Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche , Milano, Italy
(4) Unit of Geometry and Surveying, Faculty of Engineering Sciences, Universität Innsbruck, Austria

Categories: Cryo- & Hydrosphere, Remote Sensing
Keywords: Remote sensing, glacier surface classification, machine learning

Categories: Cryo- & Hydrosphere, Remote Sensing
Keywords: Remote sensing, glacier surface classification, machine learning

Remote sensing based classification of glacier surfaces has long been used to map glacier facies, debris cover, surface hydrology and different kinds of light absorbing impurities. Since the optical properties of the glacier surface affect the energy and mass balance, accurate characterizations of surface types are important for melt estimates that can take into account the impacts of impurities (e.g. mineral dust) on surface albedo. Surface classification in multispectral optical imagery is often based on empirical relationships between reflectance at particular wavelength bands or band combinations. In recent years, hyperspectral imagery has increasingly become available for environmental monitoring applications (e.g. PRISMA, EnMAP, EMIT satellite missions), although applications on ice and snow remain relatively rare. The higher spectral resolution and narrow bandwidths of hyperspectral data allow for classification and anomaly detection approaches that leverage the distinct spectral signatures of different surface types and impurities at much greater detail than in multispectral data. We use airborne hyperspectral imagery (VSWIR) of Mendenhall glacier, obtained during the 2020 melt season, and a Sentinel-2 acquisition from the same day to explore how spectral resolution affects surface classification results, focusing particularly on unsupervised classification. By varying the amount of spectral information supplied to the classifiers, we assess the sensitivity of the classification to spectral resolution and benchmark the output of several unsupervised methods against supervised classification. We present initial results from the Mendenhall Glacier case study and aim to discuss application-dependent strengths and limitations of different classification approaches.

N/A
NAME:
TBA
BUILDING:
TBA
FLOOR:
TBA
TYPE:
TBA
CAPACITY:
TBA
ACCESS:
TBA
ADDITIONAL:
TBA
FIND ME:
>> Google Maps

Limits: min. 3 words, max. 30 words or 200 characters

Choose the session you want to submit an abstract. Please be assured that similar sessions will either be scheduled consecutively or merged once the abstract submission phase is completed.

Select your preferred presentation mode
Please visit the session format page to get a detailed view on the presentation timings
The final decision on oral/poster is made by the (Co-)Conveners and will be communicated via your My#IMC dashboard

Please add here your abstract meeting the following requirements:
NO REFERNCES/KEYWORDS/ACKNOWEDGEMENTS IN AN ABSTRACT!
Limits: min 100 words, max 350 words or 2500 characters incl. tabs
Criteria: use only UTF-8 HTML character set, no equations/special characters/coding
Copy/Paste from an external editor is possible but check/reformat your text before submitting (e.g. bullet points, returns, aso)

Add here affiliations (max. 30) for you and your co-author(s). Use the row number to assign the affiliation to you and your co-author(s).
When you hover over the row number you are able to change the order of the affiliation list.

1
2
3
4
1

Add here co-author(s) (max. 30) to your abstract. Please assign the affiliation(s) of each co-author in the "Assigned Aff. No" by using the corresponding numbers from the "Affiliation List" (e.g.: 1,2,...)
When you hover over the row number you are able to change the order of the co-author list.

1
2
3
4
5
1
1
2
3
1
Close