On the importance of mapping empty glacier beds – and how to…

Abstract ID: 3.10259 | Accepted as Talk | Talk/Oral | TBA | TBA

Andrea Fischer (0)
Andrea Fischer ((0) Austrian Academy of Sciences, Schneeburggasse 24/11, 6020, Innsbruck, Tirol, AT)

(0) Austrian Academy of Sciences, Schneeburggasse 24/11, 6020, Innsbruck, Tirol, AT

Categories: Cryo- & Hydrosphere, Remote Sensing
Keywords: glacier, monitoring, climate change, remote sensing, Alps

Categories: Cryo- & Hydrosphere, Remote Sensing
Keywords: glacier, monitoring, climate change, remote sensing, Alps

During the last two summers, a new challenge on the schedule of Eastern Alpine glaciologists appeared: mapping glacier casualties. With traditional glacier inventories having been compiled in decadal intervals, the envisaged loss of one third of glaciers in the main glacier covered regions of Austria within the next five years sets a hard limit for monitoring changes. With the aim that a glacier inventory should be able to represent glacier area changes of about 5%, the temporal resolution needs to be annual – but what about related uncertainties? The increasing debris cover and number of and size of nunataks increase mapping complexity, and demands on spatial resolution of remote sensing data. In case of late season fresh snow cover, the area of patchy glaciers could be overestimated. Time lapse cam images point out that the disintegration of glacier parts can take place within a couple of days and weeks, so that the simultaneous data recording and similar period length is increasingly important for comparing glacier area change rates. Summarizing all those demands and limitations, a high resolution, easy to use tool suited for annual data recording is needed. Visual satellite remote sensing data can fulfil the criterion in case the spatial resolution is sufficient to resolve the glacier area topology and texture. Airborne low cost sensors can be an alternative for quick time lapse orthophotogrammetry data. Airborne surveys allow to cover large areas (> 100 km²) in one flight. Drone data have higher spatial resolution, but are restricted to smaller areas (a few km²) within one survey. The need to be on-site for the survey can be time consuming and generate costs for personnel. Drone imaging is so far the simplest method to produce high resolution 3D data of small-scale processes as the evolution of collapse features. Ground based time lapse images are well suited for longer monitoring of sites, for example glacier collapse over several years. Using multiple perspectives can allow a photogrammetric post processing. Generally, the smaller the scale of records, the more accurately the predictions should be of what should be monitored and when the event is going to take place.

N/A
NAME:
TBA
BUILDING:
TBA
FLOOR:
TBA
TYPE:
TBA
CAPACITY:
TBA
ACCESS:
TBA
ADDITIONAL:
TBA
FIND ME:
>> Google Maps

Limits: min. 3 words, max. 30 words or 200 characters

Choose the session you want to submit an abstract. Please be assured that similar sessions will either be scheduled consecutively or merged once the abstract submission phase is completed.

Select your preferred presentation mode
Please visit the session format page to get a detailed view on the presentation timings
The final decision on oral/poster is made by the (Co-)Conveners and will be communicated via your My#IMC dashboard

Please add here your abstract meeting the following requirements:
NO REFERNCES/KEYWORDS/ACKNOWEDGEMENTS IN AN ABSTRACT!
Limits: min 100 words, max 350 words or 2500 characters incl. tabs
Criteria: use only UTF-8 HTML character set, no equations/special characters/coding
Copy/Paste from an external editor is possible but check/reformat your text before submitting (e.g. bullet points, returns, aso)

Add here affiliations (max. 30) for you and your co-author(s). Use the row number to assign the affiliation to you and your co-author(s).
When you hover over the row number you are able to change the order of the affiliation list.

1
1

Add here co-author(s) (max. 30) to your abstract. Please assign the affiliation(s) of each co-author in the "Assigned Aff. No" by using the corresponding numbers from the "Affiliation List" (e.g.: 1,2,...)
When you hover over the row number you are able to change the order of the co-author list.

1
1
2
3
4
5
1
Close