Co-producing future scenarios for nature restoration and socio-ecological connectivity in mountain landscapes

Abstract ID: 3.8329 | Accepted as Talk | Talk | TBA | TBA

Alberto González-García (1)
Margot Neyret (Laboratoire d'Ecologie Alpine, CNRS, Université Grenoble Alpes, Université Savoie Mont Blanc, Grenoble 38058, France), Adrian López-Tejedor (Independent consultant), Marie-Caroline Prima (Laboratoire d'Ecologie Alpine, CNRS, Université Grenoble Alpes, Université Savoie Mont Blanc, Grenoble 38058, France), Sara Si-Moussi (Laboratoire d'Ecologie Alpine, CNRS, Université Grenoble Alpes, Université Savoie Mont Blanc, Grenoble 38058, France), Enora Bruley (Environmental Sciences, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland), Sandra Lavorel (Laboratoire d'Ecologie Alpine, CNRS, Université Grenoble Alpes, Université Savoie Mont Blanc, Grenoble 38058, France)
(1) CNRS/LECA, Bâtiment D, 2233 Rue de la Piscine, 38610 Gières, Francia

Categories: Adaptation, Biodiversity, Conservation, Ecosystems, Socio-Ecology, Spatial Planning
Keywords: Protected areas, Ecosystem services, Scenarios, Co-production, Ecological restoration

Categories: Adaptation, Biodiversity, Conservation, Ecosystems, Socio-Ecology, Spatial Planning
Keywords: Protected areas, Ecosystem services, Scenarios, Co-production, Ecological restoration

The content was (partly) adapted by AI
Content (partly) adapted by AI

The new European Nature Restoration Law presents a key opportunity to enhance ecological and socio-ecological connectivity. In the Grenoble region, a complex mountain landscape, we explored how different restoration, conservation, and ecosystem management actions could influence connectivity dynamics around protected areas. Building on prior analyses of spatial bundles of ecosystem services, derived from 12 quantified services using spatial models and grouped by social values, we identified areas with low ecosystem service supply and engaged 15 key territorial stakeholders in a participatory process to co-develop future landscape reconnection scenarios with special focus on protected areas. In the first workshop, stakeholders proposed landscape changes to improve ecological connectivity and ecosystem service provision. Based on these inputs, we developed new land-use scenarios, which were then presented and validated in a second workshop. Finally, these scenarios were evaluated to assess their impact on socio-ecological connectivity and the transmission of ecosystem services from protected areas to surrounding landscapes through their borders.

N/A
NAME:
TBA
BUILDING:
TBA
FLOOR:
TBA
TYPE:
TBA
CAPACITY:
TBA
ACCESS:
TBA
ADDITIONAL:
TBA
FIND ME:
>> Google Maps

Choose the session you want to submit an abstract. Please be assured that similar sessions will either be scheduled consecutively or merged once the abstract submission phase is completed.

Select your preferred presentation mode
Please visit the session format page to get a detailed view on the presentation timings
The final decision on oral/poster is made by the (Co-)Conveners and will be communicated via your My#IMC dashboard

Please add here your abstract meeting the following requirements:
NO REFERNCES/KEYWORDS/ACKNOWEDGEMENTS IN AN ABSTRACT!
Limits: min 100 words, max 350 words or 2500 characters incl. tabs
Criteria: use only UTF-8 HTML character set, no equations/special characters/coding
Copy/Paste from an external editor is possible but check/reformat your text before submitting (e.g. bullet points, returns, aso)

Add here affiliations (max. 30) for you and your co-author(s). Use the row number to assign the affiliation to you and your co-author(s).
When you hover over the row number you are able to change the order of the affiliation list.

1
1

Add here co-author(s) (max. 30) to your abstract. Please assign the affiliation(s) of each co-author in the "Assigned Aff. No" by using the corresponding numbers from the "Affiliation List" (e.g.: 1,2,...)
When you hover over the row number you are able to change the order of the co-author list.

1
2
3
4
5
6
1
1
2
3
4
5
1
Close