Evaluating RS-GIS Models Against Field-Measured Taxus Distribution in the Western Himalaya

Abstract ID: 3.12967 | Accepted as Talk | Requested as: Talk | TBA | TBA

Shriya Adhikari (1)
Indra Dutt, Bhatt (2)

(1) G.B. Pant Institute of Himalayan Environment and Development, GB Pant National Institute of Himalayan Environment, 263643, Almora, Uttarakhand, IN
(2) G.B Pant National Institute of Himalayan Environment, Kosi-Katarmal, 263643

Categories: Forest
Keywords: Species Distribution Modelling, Spatial Heterogeneity, Field-Based Validation, Sub-Grid Ecological Processes

Categories: Forest
Keywords: Species Distribution Modelling, Spatial Heterogeneity, Field-Based Validation, Sub-Grid Ecological Processes

Abstract
The content was (partly) adapted by AI
Content (partly) adapted by AI

Remote Sensing (RS) and Geographic Information Systems (GIS) have become essential tools for modelling species distributions, but their accuracy is often limited by the spatial resolution of available environmental datasets and the ecological complexity of mountainous landscapes. In the Western Himalaya, Taxus species valued for their medicinal properties are predominantly modelled using climatic and topographic variables. However, discrepancies often arise between predicted and actual distributions due to unresolved sub-grid ecological processes, spatial heterogeneity, and the exclusion of critical microhabitat factors from large-scale datasets. Sub-grid ecological processes refer to fine-scale environmental interactions, such as soil moisture variations, understory competition, and localized human disturbances, which are often averaged out in coarse-resolution RS-GIS models. Spatial heterogeneity, particularly in complex mountain systems, results from the high variability in temperature, precipitation, and soil conditions across short distances. For instance, in Uttarakhand’s Kumaon region, Taxus populations are often found in mixed oak-rhododendron forests with deep, moist soils, whereas in Garhwal, they are more restricted to isolated patches within conifer-dominated forests, affected by aspect-driven microclimatic differences. Similarly, in Himachal Pradesh, Taxus distribution varies significantly between the moist, shaded valleys of Kullu and the drier slopes of Chamba, challenging uniform model predictions. This study examines whether RS-GIS models adequately capture these variations by comparing model predictions with field-measured Taxus distribution. The study assesses the role of microhabitat conditions—such as canopy cover, soil depth, and disturbance levels—often absent from spatial models. Preliminary observations suggest that while RS-GIS models provide broad-scale predictions, their reliability diminishes when applied to fine-scale habitat assessments. Addressing these limitations requires integrating high-resolution ecological data and fostering collaboration between modelers and field researchers to improve the accuracy of species distribution models. This research underscores the need for interdisciplinary approaches to enhance habitat modelling and conservation planning in the Western Himalaya.

Choose the session you want to submit an abstract. Please be assured that similar sessions will either be scheduled consecutively or merged once the abstract submission phase is completed.

Select your preferred presentation mode
Please visit the session format page to get a detailed view on the presentation timings
The final decision on oral/poster is made by the (Co-)Conveners and will be communicated via your My#IMC dashboard

Please add here your abstract meeting the following requirements:
NO REFERNCES/KEYWORDS/ACKNOWEDGEMENTS IN AN ABSTRACT!
Limits: min 100 words, max 350 words or 2500 characters incl. tabs
Criteria: use only UTF-8 HTML character set, no equations/special characters/coding
Copy/Paste from an external editor is possible but check/reformat your text before submitting (e.g. bullet points, returns, aso)

Add here affiliations (max. 30) for you and your co-author(s). Use the row number to assign the affiliation to you and your co-author(s).
When you hover over the row number you are able to change the order of the affiliation list.

1
2
1

Add here co-author(s) (max. 30) to your abstract. Please assign the affiliation(s) of each co-author in the "Assigned Aff. No" by using the corresponding numbers from the "Affiliation List" (e.g.: 1,2,...)
When you hover over the row number you are able to change the order of the co-author list.

1
1
1
2
3
4
1
Close