Private

PS 3.103

Resilient Infrastructure Planning – from Research to Practice

Details

  • Full Title

    PS 3.103: Resilient Infrastructure Planning for Mountain Regions – Bridging the gap from Research to Practice
  • Scheduled

    TBA
  • Location

    TBA
  • Assigned to Synthesis Workshop

    ---
  • Thematic Focus

    Adaptation, Hazards, Sustainable Development
  • Keywords

    Resilient infrastructure, lives and livelihoods, climate change adaptation, resilience, infrastructure

Description

Mountain regions face increasing vulnerability due to natural hazards and climate change. Infrastructure development in mountains is challenged by environmental, economic, and technical constraints, compounded by inadequate risk assessments and outdated practices. Significant barriers remain, including a lack of reliable data, limited focus on risk-informed policymaking and the research to practice gap. Comprehensive multi-hazard risk assessment, supported by emerging technologies like AI and machine learning, are essential to ensure resilient and adaptive infrastructure systems. It is important to link emerging research with the mainstream practice and translate knowledge to action. Therefore, collaboration between researchers, policymakers, and practitioners is critical to building resilient and inclusive infrastructure which addresses the needs of mountain communities. This 75-minute session will include a keynote address, a panel discussion, and the launch of a publication that highlights the urgency of disaster-resilient infrastructure (DRI) in mountain regions, showcases good practices, and amplifies the voices of mountain communities and stakeholders. The session aims to achieve the following objectives: To promote research and innovation on DRI in mountain regions. To identify avenues for bridging the gap between research and practice in implementing DRI. To identify opportunities to integrate research and practice to promote DRI in policies, guidelines, regulations, tools and technologies, and capacity development. To highlight state-of-the-art research, innovations, and good practices for integrating resilience in mountain infrastructure systems

Submitted Abstracts

ID: 3.11211

Elevating Mountain Voices: The Case for Disaster Resilient Infrastructure in Mountains

Lina Rodriguez
Schneiderbauer, Stefan; Mitra, Arighna; Kumar, Navneet; Dasgupta, Sakshi; Mukhopadhyay, Suchismita

Abstract/Description

Mountain regions are at the crossroads of accelerated climate change and the livelihoods of large and varied populations that rely on them, either directly or indirectly. Mountain settlements and people are widely distributed across the globe and constitute a significant portion of the world’s population vulnerable to the impacts of climate change. Climate- and weather-related disasters, such as landslides, glacial lake outburst floods (GLOFs), floods, and wildfires have become more frequent over the past three decades. Seismic events such as earthquakes compound the risks to people, infrastructure, and economies in both mountain and further downstream areas. Physical structures and networks that provide basic and indispensable services, such as health and educational facilities, are of paramount importance for managing disaster risk. However, in mountainous terrain, the resilience of critical infrastructure is further challenged by remoteness, difficult terrain, inadequate adherence to reconstruction standards, and limited capacity for building, operating, and maintaining resilient infrastructure. At UNFCCC COP 29, CDRI (Coalition for Disaster Resilient Infrastructure) announced the Mountain Resilience Programme (MRP) to support resilient and people-centric infrastructure systems as a critical enabler in delivering essential services and livelihood opportunities in mountain regions, while also building capacities for risk-informed decision-making and fostering collaborative action on climate and disaster resilience. In line with this, the programme’s publication on disaster resilient infrastructure (DRI) in mountain regions captures voices from mountain communities and actors worldwide, advocates for resilient infrastructure that safeguards lives, livelihoods and nature, and provides an international platform for knowledge sharing, capacity building and innovation in DRI for mountain regions. The publication takes a practice-oriented, participatory approach, highlighting good practices, needs, and challenges, while aiming to elevate the importance of DRI in mountain regions within global frameworks. Additionally, it strengthens the MRP by enabling multi-hazard risk-informed decision-making, building capacity for risk-informed policies, and integrating Indigenous and ecosystem-based approaches for infrastructure development. Furthermore, it reinforces advocacy efforts for DRI in global intergovernmental processes, discussions, and collaborative actions.

ID: 3.11770

Innovations and Insights for Resilient Infrastructure in Mountains

Arighna Mitra
Dasgupta, Sakshi; Mukhopadhyay, Suchismita

Abstract/Description

Addressing the complex risks facing mountain infrastructure requires translating cutting-edge research into practical solutions that enhance resilience and safeguard communities. This panel discussion brings together researchers from CDRI’s Fellowship Programme who have developed innovative approaches for promoting resilient and sustainable infrastructure solutions in mountain regions. The panellists will present key insights from their work, including debris flow risk mapping and early warning, enhancing resilience to glacial lake outburst flood (GLOF) risks, and modelling the cascading impacts of road network disruptions in mountain regions.

Helping to bridge the gap between research and practice, this discussion will explore how these innovations can inform policy, infrastructure design, and disaster risk reduction strategies. The session will highlight the role of interdisciplinary collaboration and community engagement in ensuring that scientific advancements translate into actionable, locally relevant solutions.

ID: 3.12654

Wood wool in civil engineering constructions

Imad Lifa
Braun, Seraina

Abstract/Description

Vegetation is one of the main systems for natural protection against erosion. Their roots are stabilizing slopes and banks and adjust the water content in the soil. Once the roots are grown, the soil erosion is stopped. This process can be accelerated by using wood wool as erosion control mats or fascines as alternative to nets and rolls made of cocos or jute. Those competing products often originate from Far East and contain pesticides, plastics or seeds of neozoa. Long transports, unwanted entry of pesticides or plastics and spreading of invasive species are not an issue when using wood wool products made in Switzerland. The evaluation of the conditions für re-introducing wood wool products as slope stability controller was funded by BAFU and Innosuisse in four projects (one BAFU and three Innosuisse projects). The mentioned projects focused on the use of wood wool for erosion control to avoid shallow landslides and for embankment stabilization. The wood wool products enable revegetation of slopes and banks. Important aspects of success are the choice of appropriate plants and the right method of propagating cuttings and seeds. Both aspects vary, depending on the location and the product selected, wood wool mats or Q-fascines. In common is that both products protect the seeds and young plants from physical agents while keeping the substratum humid. Furthermore, their degradation provides fertile-organic matter for the vegetation to grow. Wood wool is comprised of a natural and local material. Therefore, it is an ecological and 100%biodegradable product. The use of wood wool represents a close production cycle. Another use of wood wool mats was found in conservating snow over the summer period, known as snowfarming. Most snowfarming places use wood chips to preserve the snow over the warm period. During last winter the new composite of wood wool mats and glacier protection fleece could be tested. By comparing the traditional method with the new composite, we observed that 6 cm of wood chips were equal to 1 cm of the composite. Therefore, the new composite saves about 95% of wood that is needed to produce the wood chips.