Private

FS 3.184

Compound and Cascading Risks in Mountain Regions

Please log in to add items to your favorites.

Details

Description

The content was (partly) adapted by AI

Mountain regions are highly prone to multiple risks intensified by climate change, and socio-demographic, and economic drivers. Therefore, particularly in these regions, it is pivotal to investigate the interplay of different hazardous processes and the drivers that exacerbate multi-risk realities. Multi-hazard and multi-risk approaches unravel complex interrelations among risk drivers and components such as: hazards, exposure, and vulnerabilities while addressing the cascading and systemic challenges posed by a chain of interconnected events. This session seeks contributions to analyzing risks related to compound and cascading hazard dynamics in mountain regions, focusing on the interactions between physical and social factors. We welcome submissions that could include but are not limited to:

  • Concepts and tools for multi-hazard and multi-risk analysis;
  • Systemic and scenario-based approaches to future multi-hazard scenarios;
  • Cross-sectoral or systemic analysis of vulnerabilities and resilience;
  • Narrative methods (e.g. forensic analysis, storylines) to reconstruct and analyze cascading events and decision-making processes;

Best practices and case studies in multi-hazard analysis and adaptation strategies; Inter, intra, and transdisciplinary methods to conceptualize interconnected multi-hazards and risks. We encourage innovative, interdisciplinary submissions that combine quantitative and qualitative methods to advance our understanding of multi-hazards and risks, as well as vulnerability and resilience, in mountain regions.

Submitted Abstracts

ID: 3.11178

Computing the impact from cascading multi-hazards for preparedness in Nepal

Alexandre Dunant

Abstract/Description

Nepal, a mountainous country with complex topography, is highly vulnerable to cascading multi-hazards such as earthquakes triggering landslides. These interconnected hazards often amplify disaster impacts, posing significant challenges for risk assessment and preparedness planning. This study focuses on developing a computational framework to assess the cascading effects of multi-hazards in Nepal. Using geospatial data, hazard modelling, and ensemble scenario simulations, we analyze the interactions between primary and secondary hazards triggered by seismic activities. The framework integrates hazard propagation pathways to quantify their combined impact on infrastructure and communities. This research provides actionable insights for policymakers and disaster management agencies to enhance resilience in high-risk mountainous regions like Nepal.

ID: 3.11203

Wood in Motion: understanding wood dynamics in disturbed catchments

Lorenzo Martini
Pellegrini, Giacomo; Iroumé, Andrés; Picco, Lorenzo

Abstract/Description

Large, infrequent disturbances (LIDs), such as storms, wildfires, and volcanic eruptions, can disrupt entire mountain catchments, yet their secondary or cascading effects are often overlooked. A deeper understanding of these processes could provide valuable guidance for river management. One crucial but frequently neglected secondary effect of LIDs is wood recruitment. Wood plays a fundamental role in forested river systems by enhancing both biotic and abiotic diversity. However, when large amounts of wood suddenly move, it can pose significant risks to infrastructures and communities. Therefore, monitoring and quantifying wood recruitment and its dynamics during and after such extreme events is essential. This contribution reports an overview of three case studies (one from Italy and two from Chile) regarding the assessment and quantification of wood recruitment and dynamics, intended as a cascading effect of LIDs in mountain catchments. In the Italian Alps, the Tegnas catchment (52 km2) was deeply affected by the Vaia Storm in 2018, which caused extensive debris flows, landslides, and tree windthrows along the slopes and floodplain, and it generated an exceptional flood in the main channel (RI > 50 yrs). Wood recruited from the banks was estimated using a GIS-based multi-disciplinary approach, first involving remote sensing and field data to quantify the tree biomass available, and then geomorphic change detection to estimate and quantify the role of erosion areas. In Chile, wood recruitment and mobility were analyzed in two catchments affected by volcanic eruptions, Chaitén in 2008 and Calbuco in 2015. The sources for wood recruitment were identified using satellite images complemented with previous research, while in-channel dynamics were analyzed using UAV and field surveys. In both basins (39 and 77 km2), cascading effects led to the massive transport of pyroclastic sediments toward downstream infrastructure, channel avulsions, and a significant increase in the availability of wood material for recruitment. Therefore, wood recruitment cannot be neglected when planning accurate and efficient hazard mitigation strategies in mountain catchments, and tools to monitor and measure wood dynamics with more accuracy are needed more than ever.

ID: 3.11282

Enhancing multi-hazard risk communication in transportation and mobility sectors

Till Wenzel
Matera, Sonia; Hoeffler, Flora; Cichomska, Katarzyna; Golfetti, Alessia

Abstract/Description

The increasing complexity of multi-hazard risk assessments, driven by data overload and uncertainties, poses challenges in effectively communicating risks to affected communities and stakeholders. The transportation and mobility sectors include daily commuters, transit traffic, emergency responders and tourists who may be particularly vulnerable to diverse hazards. This vulnerability arises from various cultural and social backgrounds that may lead to different interpretations of warnings and other risk communications. Hazards in mountainous areas include natural, as well as human-induced threats. Bridging the gap between hazard assessment and communication is crucial for resilience and requires transdisciplinary approaches. Traditionally, hazard assessments have focused on geophysical and engineering sciences, emphasizing risk quantification. But what happens after a hazard has been detected and the risk to infrastructure has been assessed? How can such events be effectively communicated during the various stages of natural hazard management – prevention, response and recovery? Cultural factors can influence how people perceive and respond to risks, either mitigating or exacerbating their consequences. To address these challenges, the integration of psycho-social and cross-cultural factors into multi-hazard risk assessment and communication is essential. Such an approach ensures the provision of clear and concise instructions that can overcome automatic human tendencies to respond in a familiar way, which may not always be appropriate in a given situation, and promotes safer behaviour. Other projects have already explored the need for such risk assessments (e.g., IMPACT project) and drafted communication guidelines for multicultural crowds (e.g., LETSCROWD project). Nevertheless, a gap persists in converting risk assessments into practical and actionable communication strategies. Within the EU Horizon project PARATUS, innovative approaches are discussed for multi-hazard assessment and adaptation strategies, particularly within the transportation and mobility sectors. By integrating findings from past studies and ongoing projects, this research highlights best practice examples and actionable recommendations for improving risk communication within transportation and mobility sectors. The ultimate goal is to ensure that risk assessments lead to effective preparedness measures, strengthening resilience against multi-hazard threats.

ID: 3.11312

The Mocoa debris flow in the Andes-Amazon transition of Colombia: chronicle of a death foretold?

Paola A. Arias
Martinez, J. Alejandro; Martinez, Juan P.

Abstract/Description

The tropical Andes of Colombia, particularly the Andes-Amazon transition region, is well known for being prone to compound mountain hazards like flash floods, debris flows, mountain torrents, and landslides. This is the result of the combination of geomorphology features associated with the steep slopes of the eastern flank of the eastern Andes cordillera in Colombia, hydrometeorological processes that produce large amounts of rainfall, and land use practices over the region. One of the most devastating debris flows in Colombia occurred during the early morning of April 1st, 2017. The 24-hour accumulated precipitation during this event corresponds to the fourth largest on record during the period 1984-2022, which, in conjunction with the precipitation accumulated during the previous 4 days, produced the overflow of the Mocoa, Mulato and Sangoyaco rivers. As a consequence, more than 600 shallow landslides were triggered, causing a huge debris flow with significant impacts, including more than 300 human casualties, more than 300 people injured, more than 3000 families affected, and about 12.500 toddlers and youths that lost access to education. However, this type of event was not considered in the pre-event local hazard map. This talk provides a general perspective of this compound event, characterized by a mesoscale convective system displacing from the Amazon, which strengthened due to the orographic lifting over the Andes slopes and a rapid intensification of the Orinoco low-level jet, triggering heavy precipitation and subsequent landslides. Here, we develop a diagnostics of the event based on multiple observational data and provide a storyline of how this type of events could change under global warming, following a Pseudo Global Warming approach. Moreover, this talk expands on the challenges of detecting and attributing compound events of this nature in a region with scarce information, highly vulnerable populations and ecosystems, and complex land use changes.

ID: 3.11897

Social vulnerability and resilience in the French Alps: The disrupting force of climate change on the opportunity to work

Philippa Shepherd

Abstract/Description

Climate change threatens work opportunities in mountain regions worldwide due to the inextricable link between work, natural capital, and environmental conditions. This socio-ecological interconnection is particularly pronounced in mountain regions, making work opportunities highly vulnerable to climate change. As a result, the ability to live well—particularly through work—will be significantly disrupted. The extent to which a person’s work is vulnerable or resilient to climate change depends on multiple factors. Deficiencies in decent work, such as job precariousness, contribute to chronic (un)employment vulnerability. Conversely, those in secure and stable jobs are more likely to remain resilient during disruptions. Working conditions also play a crucial role: individuals already working in harsh, hot environments will be disproportionately sensitive to heat stress exacerbated by climate change. However, work-related social vulnerability and resilience is also shaped by the labour market’s ability to generate work opportunities. A worker’s susceptibility to climate change impacts is determined not only by their individual work conditions and experiences but also by the system’s capacity to generate jobs. To assess worker susceptibility to climate change in the French Alps, we identified indicators representing decent work, labour market resilience, work and worker climate sensitivity, potential climate change impacts, and environmental pressures. A multi-scale cross-sectional spatial analysis reveals notable spatial differences between municipalities where workers are generally more secure and less exposed to climate hazards and those with more precarious employment and greater exposure. These patterns broadly reflect urban-rural divides, valley-high mountain distinctions, and regional variations. Although policymakers often respond to this threat with techno-centric, business-as-usual solutions, we propose a sustainable human development pathway. This approach is essential for safeguarding workers’ well-being while fostering contextually appropriate work opportunities within ecological limits.

ID: 3.12393

Bottom-up and decision-centric approaches to assess compound risks and associated impact cascades

Raphael Neukom
Vaghefi, Saeid A.; Muñoz, Randy; Salzmann, Nadine; Huggel, Christian; Muccione, Veruska

Abstract/Description

As human-induced global warming continues, the probability of climate-related extreme events is rising. The simultaneous occurrence of various extreme events and resulting impact cascades can present substantial risks to mountain communities and ecosystems.
Analyses of climate-related extreme events traditionally follow a ‘top-down’ method, where event magnitudes and return periods from climate model simulations are used in impact models to characterize potential effects on the affected systems. However, such approaches face limitations due to significant uncertainties in climate models when simulating compound and unprecedented extremes, and these uncertainties then propagate through the further impact analysis. Additionally, many systems lack impact models that can integrate climate model outputs and account for various process cascades and interconnections. These constraints hinder the effectiveness of top-down approaches for decision-making and adaptation planning.
Here we present results from bottom-up and decision-centric case studies that approach the problem starting from the impact and the effect of policy leavers on such impacts (i.e. adaptation). We do this by defining thresholds and operational ranges for system robustness and explore the landscape of decision making within such boundaries. Exploratory modelling, dynamic programming and semi-quantitative expert elicitation were used to characterize potential impacts and their cascading effects as a function of climate and socio-economic scenarios, climate models, extreme events and adaptation options. The case studies analysed the impact of compound heat and drought in protective forests, debris-flow and flood risk for an alpine community, warming thresholds for Swiss ski resorts and water management in a data scarce mountain region. Results provide a novel perspective contributing to the design and implemention of robust adaptation measures.
We compare and discuss the strengths and limitations of the different approaches and discuss future directions and priorities for working towards integrative analysis of cascading impacts and to allow successful adaptation planning.

ID: 3.12534

Analysing multi-hazard risk in the Alps by integrating Forensic Analysis and Impact Chains

Silvia Cocuccioni
Romagnoli, Federica; Olaya Calderon, Liz Jessica; Wenzel, Till; Atun, Funda; Schneiderbauer, Stefan; Pittore, Massimiliano

Abstract/Description

Enhancing our knowledge of how multiple hazards interact, trigger cascading impacts, and are influenced by societal processes is key to understanding risk in mountain regions. Analysing multiple hazards and their consequences in time over different sectors requires systemic approaches. To address this challenge, the Horizon Europe PARATUS project developed a framework integrating two approaches: (i) a structured methodology for forensic disaster analysis and (ii) impact chains. This integration provides deeper insights into disaster risk and cascading effects, learning from past events while offering a structured understanding of risk, combining the physical and social dimensions. Forensic disaster analysis systematically examines past events, focusing on socio-ecological dynamics, root causes, and human agency that contribute to risk materialization. This approach does not only document damages and losses but investigates different vulnerability dimensions and how these emerged pinpointing DRR measures undertaken to face the historical events as well as gaps which still need to be addressed to face current and future risks. By analysing policies, decisions, and systemic failures that influenced disaster outcomes, forensic analysis helps to identify weaknesses in risk management practices. Impact chains (ICs), provide a structured conceptual model to visualize the relationships between key risk components (hazard, exposure, and vulnerability) while capturing indirect and cascading consequences. ICs provide a general representation of different risk components interactions under current and future conditions, not focussing on a single past event but being informed by it. By making these interconnections explicit, ICs facilitate the identification of critical intervention points for disaster risk reduction. This integrated framework has been applied across diverse geographic and socio-economic contexts. With this contribution we present its application in the South-Eastern Alps. A general impact chain to describe current risks related to heavy rains and windstorms was developed, learning from past events such as the storm Vaia (2018) and other minor events which led to infrastructure failure and forest damage. The framework has proven effective in identifying systemic vulnerabilities and key lessons from past disaster events, enhancing disaster risk management of future extreme events.

ID: 3.13202

Evaluating compound and cascading flood risks in a montane setting of the Northeastern U.S.A.

Beverley Wemple
Balerna, Jessica

Abstract/Description

Extreme precipitation events in recent years in the Northeastern U.S. have resulted in catastrophic flooding and damages to personal property, commerce, public infrastructure and communities. In the northern Appalachian mountains of this region, flood damage vulnerability is exacerbated by steep terrain, narrow river valleys through which flood waters flow, and historic human settlement patterns. Here, we present preliminary analysis of compound and cascading flood damages resulting from flood events in 2023 and 2024 impacting the region, including damages from floodwater inundation and fluvial erosion. We evaluate key drivers of damages, including landscape setting, antecedent and storm conditions, and the presence or absence of intact natural infrastructure (forests, wetlands, floodplains) thought to mitigate flood damages. Damages in steep headwater settings, particularly along rural road networks, was associated with cascading down-network flood damages across the watersheds experiencing extreme precipitation. The presence of hydraulicly connected floodplains and compliance with newly-mandated stormwater management practices on rural roads were associated with reduced damage impacts compared to settings without these natural and managed interventions. Our results are relevant to planning, regulation and conservation efforts to build flood resiliency in mountain settings.