The Mountain’s Machine. Contemporary design actions for the regeneration of hydroelectric plants in mountain areas

Abstract ID: 3.10476 | Accepted as Talk | Talk | TBA | TBA

Giulia Azzini (1)
(1) Politecnico di Milano, Via Edoardo Bonardi 3, 20133 Milano, IT

Categories: Architecture
Keywords: Hydropower plants, Regeneration, Mountain areas, Design actions, Roveto Valley

Categories: Architecture
Keywords: Hydropower plants, Regeneration, Mountain areas, Design actions, Roveto Valley

This contribution explores the design of hydroelectric power plants as an opportunity to enhance the contemporary mountain landscape. These infrastructures are part of a complex system of architectures and relationships—sometimes intangible—that have progressively transformed mountains into a “great machine” (Jakob, 2021).
The intensive hydroelectric exploitation of the early 20th century, combined with the effects of climate change, has led—especially in Mediterranean Europe—to the obsolescence of many hydroelectric infrastructures and the rise of new renewable sources. In particular, many scholars assert that, despite hydroelectric energy will remain a supporting element in European energy production, it will not expand further (Quaranta et al., 2023). This calls for reconsidering existing hydroelectric plants and their role in the mountain landscape, both from an architectural and spatial perspective.
Despite their obsolescence and weakened ties with local communities, hydroelectric infrastructures still form a significant territorial network (Jakob, 2021). Power plants, in particular, link mountain and valley, both physically—being located between settlements and mountain foothills—and functionally—transforming water into energy distributed over long distances. Furthermore, they have historically been a site for architectural experimentation, contributing to local landscape enhancement (Pavia, 1998).
From these premises, the contribution proposes a design-driven methodology that relies on the analysis of contemporary case studies, applied to the power station typology, and structured around three “design attitudes” (Shannon and Smets, 2010): adaptation, hybridization, and reuse. These are based on the idea of the mountains not merely as productive landscapes, but as dynamic systems where water bodies, topography, built fabric, and social dynamics actively interact, generating mutual benefits. Then, the attitudes will be tested in Roveto Valley (Abruzzo, Italy), an inner area affected by depopulation and socio-economic decline, which presents several hydroelectric power plants currently in use. This context highlights the need to rethink hydroelectric landscapes within a broader territorial regeneration framework.
The outcome is to define design actions for the regeneration of hydroelectric power plants in mountain areas, fostering a dialogue between theory and architectural practice to strengthen their role within the contemporary landscape.

N/A
NAME:
TBA
BUILDING:
TBA
FLOOR:
TBA
TYPE:
TBA
CAPACITY:
TBA
ACCESS:
TBA
ADDITIONAL:
TBA
FIND ME:
>> Google Maps

Choose the session you want to submit an abstract. Please be assured that similar sessions will either be scheduled consecutively or merged once the abstract submission phase is completed.

Select your preferred presentation mode
Please visit the session format page to get a detailed view on the presentation timings
The final decision on oral/poster is made by the (Co-)Conveners and will be communicated via your My#IMC dashboard

Please add here your abstract meeting the following requirements:
NO REFERNCES/KEYWORDS/ACKNOWEDGEMENTS IN AN ABSTRACT!
Limits: min 100 words, max 350 words or 2500 characters incl. tabs
Criteria: use only UTF-8 HTML character set, no equations/special characters/coding
Copy/Paste from an external editor is possible but check/reformat your text before submitting (e.g. bullet points, returns, aso)

Add here affiliations (max. 30) for you and your co-author(s). Use the row number to assign the affiliation to you and your co-author(s).
When you hover over the row number you are able to change the order of the affiliation list.

1
1

Add here co-author(s) (max. 30) to your abstract. Please assign the affiliation(s) of each co-author in the "Assigned Aff. No" by using the corresponding numbers from the "Affiliation List" (e.g.: 1,2,...)
When you hover over the row number you are able to change the order of the co-author list.

1
1
2
3
4
5
1
Close