Socio-political risk assessment as a basis for decision-making processes in spatial planning in alpine regions

Abstract ID: 3.13694 | Not reviewed | Requested as: Talk | TBA | TBA

Bernhard Obholzer (1)

(1) Architecture, Spatial Planning, Framsweg 32d, 6020 Innsbruck, AT

Categories: Architecture, Socio-Ecology, Spatial Planning, Sustainable Development
Keywords: Socialpolitical development, Spatial planning, Resilience, Buy-to-let tourism, Safety objectives

Categories: Architecture, Socio-Ecology, Spatial Planning, Sustainable Development
Keywords: Socialpolitical development, Spatial planning, Resilience, Buy-to-let tourism, Safety objectives

Abstract

In alpine regions, permanent settlement areas are only available for a small part of the total area due to the topography. Permanent settlement areas are areas that can be supplied with infrastructure and inhabited all year round. Due to the perception that natural hazards are occurring more frequently, risk-oriented spatial planning is becoming increasingly important, especially in these alpine regions. However, in addition to the natural hazards that threaten the permanent settlement area, socio-political problems arise, which are expressed in social processes. This is particularly evident in tourism development. Tourist investor models, such as buy-to-let models, can influence social relations in tourist communities. This influence has been insufficiently represented so far in the assessment of spatial planning measures. Therefore, this paper proposes to integrate a socio-political risk approach into the decision- making process of spatial planning. For this purpose, a socio-political risk assessment model is developed based on the theory of distributive justice. This theory forms the basis for a political dimension of spatial justice. To integrate the concept of socio-political risk assessment from a social science perspective into the spatial planning process, a theoretical framework is established:
1. Space as an arena of action: In social sciences, space is not viewed as a Euclidean model but as an interaction defined by social action. In this discursive context, spatial sociology and action theory, particularly with regard to the distinction between strategic and tactical action, provide a theoretical approach.
2. Social and distributive justice: Just Culture as a foundation for a “safety” culture within an organization provides a theoretical basis for social science topics of procedural and distributive justice within “Just Spaces”.
3. Socio-scientific risk approach: From a sociological and cultural studies perspective, it is essential to consider the socio-political thought patterns of individuals and institutions. It is necessary to adopt strategies and organizational principles of a socio-scientific risk approach for sustainable spatial planning and to develop assessment criteria such as hazard and social protection goals.

Choose the session you want to submit an abstract. Please be assured that similar sessions will either be scheduled consecutively or merged once the abstract submission phase is completed.

Select your preferred presentation mode
Please visit the session format page to get a detailed view on the presentation timings
The final decision on oral/poster is made by the (Co-)Conveners and will be communicated via your My#IMC dashboard

Please add here your abstract meeting the following requirements:
NO REFERNCES/KEYWORDS/ACKNOWEDGEMENTS IN AN ABSTRACT!
Limits: min 100 words, max 350 words or 2500 characters incl. tabs
Criteria: use only UTF-8 HTML character set, no equations/special characters/coding
Copy/Paste from an external editor is possible but check/reformat your text before submitting (e.g. bullet points, returns, aso)

Add here affiliations (max. 30) for you and your co-author(s). Use the row number to assign the affiliation to you and your co-author(s).
When you hover over the row number you are able to change the order of the affiliation list.

1
1

Add here co-author(s) (max. 30) to your abstract. Please assign the affiliation(s) of each co-author in the "Assigned Aff. No" by using the corresponding numbers from the "Affiliation List" (e.g.: 1,2,...)
When you hover over the row number you are able to change the order of the co-author list.

1
1
2
3
4
5
1
Close