Searching for, searching with: transformative anthropology for imagining more inclusive models of wildlife governance in the Trentino Alps

Abstract ID: 3.10673 | Accepted as Talk | Talk | TBA | TBA

Gabriele Orlandi (1)
Nicola Martellozzo (1), Roberta Raffaetà (1)
(1) Ca' Foscari University of Venice, Dorsoduro 3911, 30123 Venice, IT

Categories: Adaptation, Anthropology, Conservation, Fieldwork, Socio-Ecology
Keywords: collaboration, Trentino Alps, bear, transformative research, anthropology

Categories: Adaptation, Anthropology, Conservation, Fieldwork, Socio-Ecology
Keywords: collaboration, Trentino Alps, bear, transformative research, anthropology

The content was (partly) adapted by AI
Content (partly) adapted by AI

The Alpine region is a major hotspot for biodiversity in Europe, shaped by various ecological regulation and conservation efforts. However, the institutionalized nature of these projects can overshadow or marginalize less formal practices and ways of living, especially when there is a lack of space to integrate diverse socio-ecological knowledge. In the Trentino Alps, the reintroduction of brown bears has led to systemic challenges for local communities. In the last decade, their attempts to have their concerns recognized have often been met with resistance from wildlife scientists and conservation authorities, leaving them feeling powerless and abandoned.

In this context, anthropology-driven transdisciplinary research offers a promising approach. It not only uncovers the complex social, political, and economic processes that stem from conservation policies but also fosters dialogue and collaboration between local actors and stakeholders. Drawing on an ongoing participatory research project on human-wildlife coexistence in the Adamello Brenta Nature Park (Trentino Alps), this paper presents a method that uses ethnographic knowledge to imagine new, unconventional practices of knowledge integration and challenge existing social and professional boundaries.

The research has demonstrated that through focus groups, regular meetings, and data sharing, researchers and stakeholders can form a shared epistemic community, working together to create a more just and inclusive approach to wildlife conservation governance. Guided by anthropological insights, experimental, multi-actor collaborations and partnerships offer a promising space to bridge conservation science and policies with local, informal knowledge and practices.

Choose the session you want to submit an abstract. Please be assured that similar sessions will either be scheduled consecutively or merged once the abstract submission phase is completed.

Select your preferred presentation mode
Please visit the session format page to get a detailed view on the presentation timings
The final decision on oral/poster is made by the (Co-)Conveners and will be communicated via your My#IMC dashboard

Please add here your abstract meeting the following requirements:
NO REFERNCES/KEYWORDS/ACKNOWEDGEMENTS IN AN ABSTRACT!
Limits: min 100 words, max 350 words or 2500 characters incl. tabs
Criteria: use only UTF-8 HTML character set, no equations/special characters/coding
Copy/Paste from an external editor is possible but check/reformat your text before submitting (e.g. bullet points, returns, aso)

Add here affiliations (max. 30) for you and your co-author(s). Use the row number to assign the affiliation to you and your co-author(s).
When you hover over the row number you are able to change the order of the affiliation list.

1
1

Add here co-author(s) (max. 30) to your abstract. Please assign the affiliation(s) of each co-author in the "Assigned Aff. No" by using the corresponding numbers from the "Affiliation List" (e.g.: 1,2,...)
When you hover over the row number you are able to change the order of the co-author list.

1
2
1
1
2
3
4
5
1
Close