Redefining potentially dangerous glacial lakes by integrating hazard mapping and downstream exposure data in Bhutan

Abstract ID: 3.11453 | Accepted as Poster | Poster | TBA | TBA

Sonam Rinzin (0)
Dunning, Stuart, Carr, Rachel, Sattar, Ashim (1)
Sonam Rinzin ((0) Newcastle University, 2nd Floor Henrydysh Building, NE1 7RU, Newcaslte, Tyne and Wear, GB)
Dunning, Stuart, Carr, Rachel, Sattar, Ashim (1)

(0) Newcastle University, 2nd Floor Henrydysh Building, NE1 7RU, Newcaslte, Tyne and Wear, GB
(1) Indian Institute of Technology Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India

(1) Indian Institute of Technology Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India

Categories: Adaptation, Hazards, Multi-scale Modeling
Keywords: Hazard, GLOF danger, Downstream settlement

Categories: Adaptation, Hazards, Multi-scale Modeling
Keywords: Hazard, GLOF danger, Downstream settlement

Glacial lakes in the high mountain regions across the world are growing in both numbers and areas. Many of these glacial lakes have produced glacial lake outburst floods some of which were devastating, resulting in numerous deaths and destructions in the downstream communities. Amidst increasing hazards from glacial lakes, settlements in vulnerable downstream area continue to expand, thereby exacerbating GLOF risk. Traditionally, the potentially dangerous glacial lakes were primarily defined based on the likelihood of producing GLOF using attributes such as topographic features surrounding the lakes. However, this approach of defining potentially dangerous glacial lake is incomplete as it does not provide any information about how glacial lake impact downstream settlement. To this end, this study redefined potentially dangerous glacial lakes in Bhutan based on hydrodynamic hazard mapping and downstream exposure data. As a result, we have produced a hazard map for all glacial lakes in Bhutan with an area greater than 0.05 km2 and which are within 1 km of the glacier terminus. Our result shows that approximately 20882 people, 2620 buildings, 270 km of road, 402 bridges and 169 hectares of farmland are exposed to GLOF in Bhutan. Thorthormi Tsho in Lunana, Punatsangchu basin is the most dangerous glacial lake. We also identified five other lakes as highly dangerous which are distributed across the Wangchu (2), Chamkharchu (2), and Punatsangchu (1) basins. Among downstream settlements, Chhoekhor Gewog in Bumthang was found to have the highest level of GLOF danger, followed by Bumthang town, Punakha town, and Lunana. Furthermore, nine additional gewogs and towns were classified as having a high level of GLOF danger. These findings highlight the urgent need to strengthen and expand the coverage of the early warning network to include all high GLOF danger gewogs and towns, thereby enhancing disaster preparedness and risk mitigation efforts. This study underscores the importance of integrating hydrodynamic hazard mapping and downstream exposure data to improve the accuracy of GLOF risk assessments and inform targeted mitigation strategies in vulnerable regions.

N/A
NAME:
TBA
BUILDING:
TBA
FLOOR:
TBA
TYPE:
TBA
CAPACITY:
TBA
ACCESS:
TBA
ADDITIONAL:
TBA
FIND ME:
>> Google Maps

Limits: min. 3 words, max. 30 words or 200 characters

Choose the session you want to submit an abstract. Please be assured that similar sessions will either be scheduled consecutively or merged once the abstract submission phase is completed.

Select your preferred presentation mode
Please visit the session format page to get a detailed view on the presentation timings
The final decision on oral/poster is made by the (Co-)Conveners and will be communicated via your My#IMC dashboard

Please add here your abstract meeting the following requirements:
NO REFERNCES/KEYWORDS/ACKNOWEDGEMENTS IN AN ABSTRACT!
Limits: min 100 words, max 350 words or 2500 characters incl. tabs
Criteria: use only UTF-8 HTML character set, no equations/special characters/coding
Copy/Paste from an external editor is possible but check/reformat your text before submitting (e.g. bullet points, returns, aso)

Add here affiliations (max. 30) for you and your co-author(s). Use the row number to assign the affiliation to you and your co-author(s).
When you hover over the row number you are able to change the order of the affiliation list.

1
1

Add here co-author(s) (max. 30) to your abstract. Please assign the affiliation(s) of each co-author in the "Assigned Aff. No" by using the corresponding numbers from the "Affiliation List" (e.g.: 1,2,...)
When you hover over the row number you are able to change the order of the co-author list.

1
2
3
1
1
2
3
1
Close