Proximity to gaps and species mixing as key predictors of European spruce bark beetle mortality in protective mountain forests of southeastern Switzerland

Abstract ID: 3.12677 | Accepted as Poster | Poster | TBA | TBA

Concetta Lisella (1)
Stefan Klesse (2), Joel Caduff-Fiddes (3), Patrick Fonti (2), Giovanni Santopuoli (1), Roberto Tognetti (4), Alessandra Bottero (3,5)
(1) University of Molise
(2) Swiss Federal Institute for Forest Snow and Landscape Research WSL
(3) WSL Institute for Snow and Avalanche Research SLF
(4) Free University of Bozen
(5) Climate Change, Extremes and Natural Hazards in Alpine Regions Research Centre CERC

Categories: ES-Forests, Monitoring, Others
Keywords: bark beetle, mortality, resilience, forest management, mountain forests

Categories: ES-Forests, Monitoring, Others
Keywords: bark beetle, mortality, resilience, forest management, mountain forests

With ongoing climate change, the European spruce bark beetle (Ips typographus) represents a growing threat for Norway spruce (Picea abies) forests, causing widespread mortality of trees that in turn causes losses of essential ecosystem services, such as protective function. Understanding the processes predisposing trees to bark beetle attacks is crucial to define correct management guidelines, for preserving forest services and functions. Having an early detection of infested or susceptible trees can allow to identify small- to mid-scale infestations before they escalate into larger outbreaks.
This contribution aims to explore the main predisposing factors to bark beetle infestation at the tree level. At this purpose, forest structural data and increment cores were collected in bark-beetle killed and living stands in mountain protective forests in south-eastern Switzerland, in the canton of Grisons. Particularly, statistical modelling, tree-ring analysis and the comparison of drought responses were combined to have a better overview of bark beetle attack dynamics.
We did not observe significant differences in drought responses between bark beetle-killed and living trees. Furthermore, the models outlined that forest structure variables were the most important predictors of bark beetle-induced mortality. Specifically, trees closer to forest gaps and with lower species mingling in neighbourhood were more prone to bark beetle attack. These findings provide valuable insights to support forest management in mountain protective forests. They suggest that strategies to reduce bark beetle infestations should focus on the spatial arrangement of forest gaps and increasing tree species diversity. This information can help forest managers to identify more accurately high-risk areas, allowing for better resource allocation to prevent larger outbreaks and maintain the protective effect of the forest.

Choose the session you want to submit an abstract. Please be assured that similar sessions will either be scheduled consecutively or merged once the abstract submission phase is completed.

Select your preferred presentation mode
Please visit the session format page to get a detailed view on the presentation timings
The final decision on oral/poster is made by the (Co-)Conveners and will be communicated via your My#IMC dashboard

Please add here your abstract meeting the following requirements:
NO REFERNCES/KEYWORDS/ACKNOWEDGEMENTS IN AN ABSTRACT!
Limits: min 100 words, max 350 words or 2500 characters incl. tabs
Criteria: use only UTF-8 HTML character set, no equations/special characters/coding
Copy/Paste from an external editor is possible but check/reformat your text before submitting (e.g. bullet points, returns, aso)

Add here affiliations (max. 30) for you and your co-author(s). Use the row number to assign the affiliation to you and your co-author(s).
When you hover over the row number you are able to change the order of the affiliation list.

1
2
3
4
5
1

Add here co-author(s) (max. 30) to your abstract. Please assign the affiliation(s) of each co-author in the "Assigned Aff. No" by using the corresponding numbers from the "Affiliation List" (e.g.: 1,2,...)
When you hover over the row number you are able to change the order of the co-author list.

1
2
3
4
5
6
1
1
2
3
4
5
1
Close