Pesticide degradation potential expressed by cryoconite hole microbial communities from an alpine glacier and the Greenland Ice Sheet: a comparative study

Abstract ID: 3.12721 | Accepted as Talk | Talk | TBA | TBA

Alessandro Cuzzeri (1,3)
Lars Van Dijk (2), Carsten Suhr Jacobsen (2), Birgit Sattler (1,3)
(1) University of Innsbruck, Technikerstrasse 25, 6020, Innsbruck, Austria
(2) Aarhus University, Frederiksborgvej 399, 4000, Roskilde, Denmark
(3) Austrian Polar Research Institute, Djerassiplatz 1, 1030 Vienna, Austria

Categories: Biodiversity, Cryo- & Hydrosphere, Ecosystems
Keywords: glacier, pesticides, microbiology, cryoconite hole

Categories: Biodiversity, Cryo- & Hydrosphere, Ecosystems
Keywords: glacier, pesticides, microbiology, cryoconite hole

Since their mass introduction for agricultural use during the last century, pesticides attracted an increasing amount of attention from the scientific community due to their unique nature of being released in the environment not by mistake, but by design. While some of these compounds are generally sprayed directly onto crops to reduce yield losses caused by pests, their environmental repercussions can hardly be circumscribed to the area of application. Driven by their differential chemical affinity towards environmental matrices, some classes of pesticides that are more prone to resuspension go through medium/long-range atmospheric transport and end up accumulating elsewhere. Glacial habitats are sometimes referred to as “cold condensers” precisely due to their tendency of acting as such accumulating compartments, exposing off-target (micro)biological communities to enhanced levels of toxicants. In this study, we determine the degradative adaptations and pesticide mineralization rates by spiking and incubating microbial communities sampled from cryoconite holes on the Forni Glacier (Central Alps, Italy) and the Greenland Ice Sheet. Cryoconite holes are unique glacial habitats: when wind-blown dark-colored sediment is deposited on the bare ice, in virtue of its lower albedo it melts through the surface while gradually filling up with melt water, resulting in a sheltered environment for microorganisms to thrive in. To simulate the native environment, we employ a custom-built incubation unit running on a 12-h light and 12-h dark regime and controlled temperature. The compounds of choice are 14C-labelled 2,4D, MCPA, Chlorpyrifos and glucose, respectively being two widely used herbicides, an insecticide and a positive control, inoculated at zero, 1 and 100ppm concentrations. A scintillation counter is used to quantify the mineralization along the 6 months microcosm experiment, while small aliquots of sediment are sampled from the bottles for the subsequent metagenomics and transcriptomics analyses. Preliminary results highlight significant differences in mineralization across all compounds between Alpine and Greenlandic communities, with the former consistently outperforming the latter in mineralized percentage. Further genomic insights will be crucial to characterize the microbial taxa responsible for the degradation processes and their adaptations, to better understand the underlying processes they are responsible for.

Choose the session you want to submit an abstract. Please be assured that similar sessions will either be scheduled consecutively or merged once the abstract submission phase is completed.

Select your preferred presentation mode
Please visit the session format page to get a detailed view on the presentation timings
The final decision on oral/poster is made by the (Co-)Conveners and will be communicated via your My#IMC dashboard

Please add here your abstract meeting the following requirements:
NO REFERNCES/KEYWORDS/ACKNOWEDGEMENTS IN AN ABSTRACT!
Limits: min 100 words, max 350 words or 2500 characters incl. tabs
Criteria: use only UTF-8 HTML character set, no equations/special characters/coding
Copy/Paste from an external editor is possible but check/reformat your text before submitting (e.g. bullet points, returns, aso)

Add here affiliations (max. 30) for you and your co-author(s). Use the row number to assign the affiliation to you and your co-author(s).
When you hover over the row number you are able to change the order of the affiliation list.

1
2
3
1

Add here co-author(s) (max. 30) to your abstract. Please assign the affiliation(s) of each co-author in the "Assigned Aff. No" by using the corresponding numbers from the "Affiliation List" (e.g.: 1,2,...)
When you hover over the row number you are able to change the order of the co-author list.

1
2
3
1
1
2
3
4
1
Close