Perceptions of nature’s contributions to people across an elevational gradient in Eastern Nepal

Abstract ID: 3.11976 | Accepted as Talk | Requested as: Talk | TBA | TBA

Biraj Adhikari (1,2,3)
Noëlle, Valérie Schenk (3,4); Nakul, Chettri (5); Markus, Fisher (3); Graham, W. Prescott (3,6); Davnah, Urbach (3,7,8)

(1) University College London, Gower St, WC1E 6BT, London, United Kingdom
(2) Practical Action Nepal, Lazimpat Rd., 44600, Kathmandu, Nepal
(3) University of Bern, Altenbergrain, 3013, Bern, Switzerland
(4) Bern University of Applied Sciences, Brückenstrasse , 3005, Bern, Switzerland
(5) International Centre for Integrated Mountain Development, Lalitpur, 44500, Kathmandu, Nepal
(6) The Biodiversity Consultancy, 3E King’s Parade, CB2 1SJ, Cambridge, UK
(7) Global Mountain Biodiversity Assessment, Altenbergrain, 3013, Bern, Switzerland
(8) University of Lausanne, Ch. de l’Institut, Bramois,1967, Sion, Switzerland

Categories: Conservation, Fieldwork, Socio-Ecology, Sustainable Development
Keywords: Nepal, conservation, ecosystem services, human perceptions, sustainable development

Categories: Conservation, Fieldwork, Socio-Ecology, Sustainable Development
Keywords: Nepal, conservation, ecosystem services, human perceptions, sustainable development

Abstract
The content was (partly) adapted by AI
Content (partly) adapted by AI

Nepal, nested within the Hindu Kush Himalayas, faces mounting challenges from land-use change, overexploitation of natural resources, and climate change. These pressures are driving a decline in biodiversity and its related contributions to people. International frameworks such as the Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework are established to address these issues. But they also risk generalized, top-down approaches to conservation that overlook local priorities, leading to misunderstandings, conflicts, and resistance to ecological transitions. To understand the importance of community perspectives in developing context-driven conservation strategies that effectively bridge global goals and local realities, we examined how local communities perceive nature’s contributions to their wellbeing along an elevational gradient in eastern Nepal. We conducted 320 semi-structured household surveys to explore the material, non-material, and regulating contributions of nature (NCP) to human wellbeing and examine how geographic, socioeconomic, and cultural factors shape people’s perceptions of NCP. Our results revealed that while respondents broadly acknowledged nature as integral to their wellbeing, the strength and character of this connection were highly context-specific. Higher-elevation mountain communities, whose lives and livelihoods were more intricately linked with nature, reported more positive perceptions, reflecting their greater reliance on NCP. Conversely, inhabitants residing in the lower elevation plains where human-elephant conflicts are frequent, exhibited comparatively more negative attitudes. Furthermore, formal levels of education, socioeconomic status, and gender also shaped perceptions of nature’s contributions to wellbeing, influencing how people value and interact with the environment. These insights point to the need for holistic conservation strategies that move beyond dominant forms of conservation focused solely on habitat preservation to a more comprehensive approach that supports various NCP simultaneously. Taken together with previous evidence from the same region for the importance of a people-focused and contextualized approach to sustainable development and for tight links between NCPs and sustainability, our work emphasizes the need for context-sensitive, integrated approaches to socio-ecological transitions that not only safeguard biodiversity but also enhance human wellbeing.

Choose the session you want to submit an abstract. Please be assured that similar sessions will either be scheduled consecutively or merged once the abstract submission phase is completed.

Select your preferred presentation mode
Please visit the session format page to get a detailed view on the presentation timings
The final decision on oral/poster is made by the (Co-)Conveners and will be communicated via your My#IMC dashboard

Please add here your abstract meeting the following requirements:
NO REFERNCES/KEYWORDS/ACKNOWEDGEMENTS IN AN ABSTRACT!
Limits: min 100 words, max 350 words or 2500 characters incl. tabs
Criteria: use only UTF-8 HTML character set, no equations/special characters/coding
Copy/Paste from an external editor is possible but check/reformat your text before submitting (e.g. bullet points, returns, aso)

Add here affiliations (max. 30) for you and your co-author(s). Use the row number to assign the affiliation to you and your co-author(s).
When you hover over the row number you are able to change the order of the affiliation list.

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
1

Add here co-author(s) (max. 30) to your abstract. Please assign the affiliation(s) of each co-author in the "Assigned Aff. No" by using the corresponding numbers from the "Affiliation List" (e.g.: 1,2,...)
When you hover over the row number you are able to change the order of the co-author list.

1
2
3
4
5
1
1
2
3
4
5
1
Close