Patterns of glacier elevation change and appropriate models to assess observed and future ice loss

Abstract ID: 3.13028 | Accepted as Talk | Talk | TBA | TBA

Whyjay Zheng (1,2)
Mike Willis (3)
(1) Center for Space and Remote Sensing Research, National Central University, Taoyuan City, Taiwan
(2) Taiwan Polar Institute, National Central University, Taoyuan City, Taiwan
(3) Department of Geosciences, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, Virginia, United States

Categories: Cryo- & Hydrosphere, Monitoring, Remote Sensing, Water Resources
Keywords: Glacier elevation change, Digital Elevation Model, Non-linear modeling, Dynamic ice flow

Categories: Cryo- & Hydrosphere, Monitoring, Remote Sensing, Water Resources
Keywords: Glacier elevation change, Digital Elevation Model, Non-linear modeling, Dynamic ice flow

Digital Elevation Model (DEM) differencing involving more than two DEMs is used to estimate glacier elevation change. A good regression model fit to the time series of glacier elevations is crucial for both prediction and error assessment. Weighted or unweighted linear models are traditionally used for this purpose and typically have a good fit over area of a glacier where surface mass balance is the major factor affecting glacier elevation. These models are less credibile in regions experiencing dynamic changes in ice flow. A non-linear model may be a good alternative, and recent advances have shown how powerful models, such as the Gaussian progress regression, can be. However, a non-linear model suffers from over-fitting and poor extrapolation, and the model itself does not consider the underlying physical mechanism. Motivated by this background, we focus on the ArctiDEM strip data set over glacier areas with dynamic signals of elevation change, including calving, surging, subglacial draining, and ice collapse. We qualitatively classify them into several patterns. Each pattern can be modeled by a distinct linear or non-linear model for better performance. For example, an elevation time series classified as calving can be modeled with a step function for a more accurate future extrapolation. We envision these classifications as a good foundation for creating a training data set for an automatic elevation change analysis using AI.

Choose the session you want to submit an abstract. Please be assured that similar sessions will either be scheduled consecutively or merged once the abstract submission phase is completed.

Select your preferred presentation mode
Please visit the session format page to get a detailed view on the presentation timings
The final decision on oral/poster is made by the (Co-)Conveners and will be communicated via your My#IMC dashboard

Please add here your abstract meeting the following requirements:
NO REFERNCES/KEYWORDS/ACKNOWEDGEMENTS IN AN ABSTRACT!
Limits: min 100 words, max 350 words or 2500 characters incl. tabs
Criteria: use only UTF-8 HTML character set, no equations/special characters/coding
Copy/Paste from an external editor is possible but check/reformat your text before submitting (e.g. bullet points, returns, aso)

Add here affiliations (max. 30) for you and your co-author(s). Use the row number to assign the affiliation to you and your co-author(s).
When you hover over the row number you are able to change the order of the affiliation list.

1
2
3
1

Add here co-author(s) (max. 30) to your abstract. Please assign the affiliation(s) of each co-author in the "Assigned Aff. No" by using the corresponding numbers from the "Affiliation List" (e.g.: 1,2,...)
When you hover over the row number you are able to change the order of the co-author list.

1
1
1
2
3
4
1
Close