Optimizing design of MSE wall ensuring safety and sustainable approach

Abstract ID: 3.12563 | Accepted as Poster | Talk/Oral | TBA | TBA

Devagya Raman (0)
Pain, Dr Anindya (1,2)
Devagya Raman ((0) Academy of Scientific and Innovative Research at Central Building Research Institute, CENTRAL BUILDING RESEARCH INSTITUTE, 247667, ROORKEE, Uttarakhand, IN)
Pain, Dr Anindya (1,2)

(0) Academy of Scientific and Innovative Research at Central Building Research Institute, CENTRAL BUILDING RESEARCH INSTITUTE, 247667, ROORKEE, Uttarakhand, IN
(1) CSIR - CBRI ROORKEE, CENTRAL BUILDING RESEARCH INSTITUTE ROORKEE 249407 UTTARAKHAND

(1) CSIR - CBRI ROORKEE, CENTRAL BUILDING RESEARCH INSTITUTE ROORKEE 249407 UTTARAKHAND

Categories: Socio-Ecology, Sustainable Development
Keywords: Hilly Terrain Infrastructure, LCA, SLOPE STABILITY, GEOSYNTHETICS, MSE WALL

Categories: Socio-Ecology, Sustainable Development
Keywords: Hilly Terrain Infrastructure, LCA, SLOPE STABILITY, GEOSYNTHETICS, MSE WALL

The content was (partly) adapted by AI
Content (partly) adapted by AI

Mechanically stabilized earth (MSE) walls are gaining popularity in different parts of the world. These walls have demonstrated tremendous potential in supporting the rapid infrastructure development occurring in our country. This technology is highly versatile and is used for constructing highway approach roads, railway bridges, and airport runways in challenging terrains. MSE walls are generally designed using a 2D plane strain approach. However, recent observations indicate that these structures are extensively used in undulating terrains, where the 2D plane strain assumption is invalid—such as at turning corners of roads in hilly regions. Few studies have attempted to quantify the additional reinforcement requirements for these corners. Recent failures of reinforced earth structures, such as those at Yeager Airport (USA) and Sikkim Airport (India), highlight the need for improved design considerations. The geosynthetic-reinforced structure at Sikkim Airport exhibited extensive distress, primarily due to improper drainage design. Another contributing factor was the presence of a highly fractured phyllite rock mass at the base of this extremely high retaining wall. Similarly, the catastrophic failure of a 73 m high reinforced soil slope at Yeager Airport in Charleston, West Virginia, USA, was analyzed by VandenBerge et al. (2021), who concluded that improper engineering judgment and local stress concentrations were the primary causes of failure. For infrastructure expansion in tough hilly terrains, integrating airways and highways while minimizing environmental impact is crucial. Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) studies highlight the importance of using locally available materials, as MSE wall design parameters generally allow for draining backfill material. However, contractors often opt for locally available soil, which may be highly cohesive. To ensure safety, researchers tend to adopt high factors of safety (FOS). In the present research, numerical modeling using Plaxis 3D will be employed to study corner stress development in MSE walls—an aspect that remains hidden in 2D limit equilibrium method (LEM) software such as Rocscience Slide. A numerical analysis of 26 cross-sections of MSE walls was conducted for a RESA project in the hilly terrains of Northeast India (Pakyong Sikkim).

N/A
NAME:
TBA
BUILDING:
TBA
FLOOR:
TBA
TYPE:
TBA
CAPACITY:
TBA
ACCESS:
TBA
ADDITIONAL:
TBA
FIND ME:
>> Google Maps

Limits: min. 3 words, max. 30 words or 200 characters

Choose the session you want to submit an abstract. Please be assured that similar sessions will either be scheduled consecutively or merged once the abstract submission phase is completed.

Select your preferred presentation mode
Please visit the session format page to get a detailed view on the presentation timings
The final decision on oral/poster is made by the (Co-)Conveners and will be communicated via your My#IMC dashboard

Please add here your abstract meeting the following requirements:
NO REFERNCES/KEYWORDS/ACKNOWEDGEMENTS IN AN ABSTRACT!
Limits: min 100 words, max 350 words or 2500 characters incl. tabs
Criteria: use only UTF-8 HTML character set, no equations/special characters/coding
Copy/Paste from an external editor is possible but check/reformat your text before submitting (e.g. bullet points, returns, aso)

Add here affiliations (max. 30) for you and your co-author(s). Use the row number to assign the affiliation to you and your co-author(s).
When you hover over the row number you are able to change the order of the affiliation list.

1
1

Add here co-author(s) (max. 30) to your abstract. Please assign the affiliation(s) of each co-author in the "Assigned Aff. No" by using the corresponding numbers from the "Affiliation List" (e.g.: 1,2,...)
When you hover over the row number you are able to change the order of the co-author list.

1
1
1
2
3
4
5
1
Close