Mitigating torrential risks in mountanous regions through forest management: A case study from Slovenia

Abstract ID: 3.12445 | Not reviewed | Requested as: Talk | TBA | TBA

Matjaž Guček (1,2)
Živa, Bončina (1,2); Tina, Simončič (1,2); Irena, Mrak (1,3); Aleš, Poljanec (1,2)

(1) Slovenia Forest Service, Večna pot 2, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia
(2) University of Ljubljana, Biotechnical Faculty, Department of Forestry and Renewable Forest Resources, Večna pot 83, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia
(3) Faculty of Environmental Protection, Trg mladosti 7, 3320 Velenje

Categories: Adaptation, ES-Forests, Hazards
Keywords: torrential risk, adaptive forest management, natural hazard mitigation, monitoring system, flood prevention

Categories: Adaptation, ES-Forests, Hazards
Keywords: torrential risk, adaptive forest management, natural hazard mitigation, monitoring system, flood prevention

Abstract

Slovenia, as part of the Alpine region, is characterized by a complex hydrological network of torrential streams influenced by lithological and geomorphological characteristics, and precipitation patterns. The majority of torrential streams are located in forests. Forest ecosystems play a crucial role in mitigating the impacts of torrential hazard. Despite Slovenia’s long-established close-to-nature, sustainable and multifunctional forest management system, measures to mitigate torrential hazards along mountain streams have often been neglected. This is partially a consequence of manifold competences of different actors, and an absence of comprehensive torrent management system. The increased frequency and intensity of extreme weather events over the past decade have caused severe forest damages and substantial financial losses due to torrential floods, which has triggered many debates and activities dealing with torrent management in forests. In the presentation, we will introduce an approach developed within Forest EcoValue project aimed at establishing a comprehensive management system for torrential risk mitigation in forests. The study area used represents a diverse mountainous region (proportion of forests 74%). Our methodology follows a systematic framework, beginning with the identification of high-risk torrents based on hazard maps, field assessments, and historical damage records. There are 72 torrents with a total length of 102 km within the study area. 33% of these torrents are considered problematic, while 5% are classified as highly problematic. We developed a monitoring system incorporating the documentation of silent witnesses, the identification of critical areas for woody debris removal, and the delineation of torrent sections requiring targeted biotechnical interventions. Additionally, we recorded the time spent on monitoring the assessment of efficiency and estimate the needed capacities. At the end, we proposed a governance model (i.e., responsibilities of different actors). To elaborate the system, several activities were caried out on staff training, capacity building, networking between stakeholders using a set of participatory workshops. Our results will highlight the role of sound forest management in the comprehensive system of torrential risk mitigation, particularly in the context of climate change and enhanced flood protection. The study was funded by the Forest EcoValue project (Interreg Alpine Space Programme).

Choose the session you want to submit an abstract. Please be assured that similar sessions will either be scheduled consecutively or merged once the abstract submission phase is completed.

Select your preferred presentation mode
Please visit the session format page to get a detailed view on the presentation timings
The final decision on oral/poster is made by the (Co-)Conveners and will be communicated via your My#IMC dashboard

Please add here your abstract meeting the following requirements:
NO REFERNCES/KEYWORDS/ACKNOWEDGEMENTS IN AN ABSTRACT!
Limits: min 100 words, max 350 words or 2500 characters incl. tabs
Criteria: use only UTF-8 HTML character set, no equations/special characters/coding
Copy/Paste from an external editor is possible but check/reformat your text before submitting (e.g. bullet points, returns, aso)

Add here affiliations (max. 30) for you and your co-author(s). Use the row number to assign the affiliation to you and your co-author(s).
When you hover over the row number you are able to change the order of the affiliation list.

1
2
3
1

Add here co-author(s) (max. 30) to your abstract. Please assign the affiliation(s) of each co-author in the "Assigned Aff. No" by using the corresponding numbers from the "Affiliation List" (e.g.: 1,2,...)
When you hover over the row number you are able to change the order of the co-author list.

1
2
3
4
1
1
2
3
4
5
1
Close