Livelihood Resilience Measurement and Group Differences of Ecological Migrants at Extremely High Altitude: A Case Study at Senburi Resettlement in Xizang, China

Abstract ID: 3.13548 | Accepted as Talk | Talk | TBA | TBA

Jifei Zhang (1)
Jinyi Ouyang (1)
(1) Institute of Mountain Hazards and Environment, Chinese Academy of Sciences, No.189, QunXianNan Street,TianFu New Area, 610213 Chengdu, CN

Categories: Adaptation, Conservation, Culture, Fieldwork, Migration, Policy, Sustainable Development
Keywords: Extremely high-altitude, Ecological relocation, Livelihood resilience, livelihood resilience, Xizang

Categories: Adaptation, Conservation, Culture, Fieldwork, Migration, Policy, Sustainable Development
Keywords: Extremely high-altitude, Ecological relocation, Livelihood resilience, livelihood resilience, Xizang

Organized ecological relocations significantly improve the living conditions of herders at extremely high altitudes in Xizang, yet environmental changes pose challenges to sustaining their livelihoods. This study examines Senburi Resettlement, the largest high-altitude ecological relocation site in Xizang, to assess differences in livelihood resilience among migrant groups. Data were collected through questionnaire surveys and in-depth interviews, and a game theory combination weighting method was employed to quantitatively evaluate post-relocation livelihood resilience. A two-step clustering analysis then identified distinct migrant groups and explored their resilience patterns. (1) The average livelihood resilience score at Senburi Resettlement was 2.93, comprising buffering capacity (1.29), self-organization capacity (0.77), and learning capacity (0.86). Overall resilience remains relatively low. (2) Resilience scores varied by township: Gacuo scored the highest (2.99), followed by Cuozheqiangma (2.97) and Qiangma (2.96), while Ejiu scored the lowest (2.75). (3) The sampled households were grouped into three categories: young knowledgeable female-headed households, resource-constrained male-headed households, and affluent male-led households. The affluent male-led households displayed the highest average resilience (3.50), followed by the young knowledgeable female-headed households (3.30), while resource-constrained male-headed households had the lowest (2.43). (4) These disparities primarily arose from variations in buffering capacity. Future efforts should focus on enhancing the economic capital and skills of resource-constrained male-headed households, tapping the governance potential of young knowledgeable female-headed households, and leveraging the demonstration effect of affluent male-led households to improve overall resilience. These findings elucidate the differential livelihood resilience of high-altitude ecological migrants in Xizang and offer targeted policy recommendations for advancing sustainable livelihood development and effective resettlement management in other ecologically fragile regions.

Choose the session you want to submit an abstract. Please be assured that similar sessions will either be scheduled consecutively or merged once the abstract submission phase is completed.

Select your preferred presentation mode
Please visit the session format page to get a detailed view on the presentation timings
The final decision on oral/poster is made by the (Co-)Conveners and will be communicated via your My#IMC dashboard

Please add here your abstract meeting the following requirements:
NO REFERNCES/KEYWORDS/ACKNOWEDGEMENTS IN AN ABSTRACT!
Limits: min 100 words, max 350 words or 2500 characters incl. tabs
Criteria: use only UTF-8 HTML character set, no equations/special characters/coding
Copy/Paste from an external editor is possible but check/reformat your text before submitting (e.g. bullet points, returns, aso)

Add here affiliations (max. 30) for you and your co-author(s). Use the row number to assign the affiliation to you and your co-author(s).
When you hover over the row number you are able to change the order of the affiliation list.

1
1

Add here co-author(s) (max. 30) to your abstract. Please assign the affiliation(s) of each co-author in the "Assigned Aff. No" by using the corresponding numbers from the "Affiliation List" (e.g.: 1,2,...)
When you hover over the row number you are able to change the order of the co-author list.

1
1
1
2
3
4
5
1
Close