Land management paths for increasing the resilience of alpine farming in the Eisenwurzen region

Abstract ID: 3.10213 | Accepted as Talk | Requested as: Talk | TBA | TBA

Stefan Kirchweger (1)
Andreas, Niedermayr (2); Hannah, Politor (1); Kathi, Klinglmayr (1); Fritz, Wittmann (3); Jochen, Kantelhardt (2)

(1) STUDIA, Panoramaweg 1, 4553 Schlierbach, AT
(2) BOKU University
(3) Bundesministerium für Land- und Forstwirtschaft, Regionen und Wasserwirtschaft

Categories: Agriculture
Keywords: alpine farming, socio-ecological resilience, societal preferences, discrete choice experiment, participatory research

Categories: Agriculture
Keywords: alpine farming, socio-ecological resilience, societal preferences, discrete choice experiment, participatory research

Abstract
The content was (partly) adapted by AI
Content (partly) adapted by AI

Due to their traditional management by farmers and their unique flora and fauna, alpine pastures and mountain meadows can be considered as highly valuable cultural and natural assets for the region and the people who live there and visit it. The aim of this analysis is to gain a better understanding of societal preferences in order to identify strategies for the future management of alpine pastures and mountain meadows in the Eisenwurzen region that increase the socio-ecological resilience of alpine farming. We combine different methods of participatory research to identify critical attributes and elicit societal preferences with a discrete choice experiment (DCE). A Latent Class Choice Model (LCCM) allows us to capture the heterogeneity of respondents’ preferences. Six critical attributes were identified, namely tourist amenities and scenery, local food production, knowledge transfer of traditional management practices, and biodiversity in terms of plant and insect species richness. The DCE was conducted through an online survey, which was completed by 360 respondents from Eisenwurzen and surrounding areas. The LCCM identified three classes of respondents with different preferences. One class, representing about 40% of the respondents, has very high preferences for all attributes. These respondents tend to be older, more male and from the Eisenwurzen region. However, there is also a class (~50% of respondents) that shows more differentiated preferences for individual attributes and consists more of younger female respondents. The remaining class shows almost no significant preferences for any attribute and consists of respondents with lower incomes, larger households and a very low proportion of people who are members of an association. These results, in combination with further interactions with stakeholders, can support policy makers in the development of management paths for alpine pastures and mountain meadows in the Eisenwurzen region. For example, the high preferences for biodiversity and regional food suggest a potential for the conservation of these landscapes through traditional management with a focus on biodiversity. These management could be financed by further agri-environmental payments or price premiums for differentiated regional products.

Choose the session you want to submit an abstract. Please be assured that similar sessions will either be scheduled consecutively or merged once the abstract submission phase is completed.

Select your preferred presentation mode
Please visit the session format page to get a detailed view on the presentation timings
The final decision on oral/poster is made by the (Co-)Conveners and will be communicated via your My#IMC dashboard

Please add here your abstract meeting the following requirements:
NO REFERNCES/KEYWORDS/ACKNOWEDGEMENTS IN AN ABSTRACT!
Limits: min 100 words, max 350 words or 2500 characters incl. tabs
Criteria: use only UTF-8 HTML character set, no equations/special characters/coding
Copy/Paste from an external editor is possible but check/reformat your text before submitting (e.g. bullet points, returns, aso)

Add here affiliations (max. 50) for you and your co-author(s). Use the row number to assign the affiliation to you and your co-author(s).
When you hover over the row number you are able to change the order of the affiliation list.

1
2
3
1

Add here co-author(s) (max. 50) to your abstract. Please assign the affiliation(s) of each co-author in the "Assigned Aff. No" by using the corresponding numbers from the "Affiliation List" (e.g.: 1,2,...)
When you hover over the row number you are able to change the order of the co-author list.

1
2
3
4
5
1

Each tag/name can exist of max. 3 single words

1
2
3
4
5
1
Close