Investigating transitional rock glaciers through ERT and IP measurements

Abstract ID: 3.12066 | Accepted as Poster | Poster | TBA | TBA

Julia Agziou (0)
Casotti, Clément (2), Bock, Josue (2), Cusiocanqui, Diego (3), Revil, Andre (2), Schoeneich, Philippe (1)
Julia Agziou (1, 2)
Casotti, Clément (2), Bock, Josue (2), Cusiocanqui, Diego (3), Revil, Andre (2), Schoeneich, Philippe (1)

1, 2
(1) Pacte, University Grenoble Alpes, 14 av. Marie Reynoard, 38000 Grenoble
(2) Edytem, University Savoie Mont Blanc, 5, bd de la mer Caspienne 73376 Le Bourget du Lac cedex
(3) Institut des Sciences de la Terre, 1381 rue de la Piscine, 38610 Gières

(1) Pacte, University Grenoble Alpes, 14 av. Marie Reynoard, 38000 Grenoble
(2) Edytem, University Savoie Mont Blanc, 5, bd de la mer Caspienne 73376 Le Bourget du Lac cedex
(3) Institut des Sciences de la Terre, 1381 rue de la Piscine, 38610 Gières

Categories: Cryo- & Hydrosphere
Keywords: permafrost, rock glacier, internal sutructure, ERT, IP

Categories: Cryo- & Hydrosphere
Keywords: permafrost, rock glacier, internal sutructure, ERT, IP

Rock glaciers are well-known as visible landforms of creeping mountain permafrost. Studies over the last decades revealed a global and recent acceleration that correlates with the rise in air temperatures. However, its impact on degraded permafrost conditions has been studied in a lesser extent than those of active rock glaciers. Even fewer studies have explored the possibility of deactivated rock glaciers ‘reaching an active state’ (RGIK, 2023). However, 20% of transitional rock glaciers in the French Alps were found to exhibit speeds higher than expected.
In this poster, we aim to bring insights on the internal characteristics of three rock glaciers through a joint inversion of Electrical Resistivity Tomography (ERT) and Induced Polarization (IP) data in a comparative approach. Four longitudinal pseudo-sections will be presented for Lanserlia, Chanrouge (Vanoise massif) and Vieux Marinet (Ubaye massif) rock glaciers considering their differences in activity and dynamical characteristics.
First, the range of resistivity values varies significantly from one site to another. The interpretation of thick resistive layers could indicate the presence of a frozen core at all three sites, although the location, thickness, and homogeneity of these horizons differ. Chanrouge rock glacier has the thickest frozen core and this thickness decreases with elevation. Lanserlia exhibits distinct resistive horizons between the lower and higher areas, either between the two profiles where a thinner and smaller frozen layer is visible on one of them. Last, the Vieux Marinet rock glacier exhibits a thick and large discontinuous permafrost body. Neither high nor continuous resistive values are observed on the upper and active unit, where the presence of multiple conductive horizons are moreover present
This study contributes to a better understanding of the role of internal structure, particularly the presence of ice and water, in the motion of these landforms. The joint use of ERT and IP allows for better identification of different transitional trajectories ERT signatures. The IP data particularly provides additional insights into subsurface properties by helping to differentiate ice, water, and fine-grained sediments, thereby refining the hydrogeological interpretation.

N/A
NAME:
TBA
BUILDING:
TBA
FLOOR:
TBA
TYPE:
TBA
CAPACITY:
TBA
ACCESS:
TBA
ADDITIONAL:
TBA
FIND ME:
>> Google Maps

Limits: min. 3 words, max. 30 words or 200 characters

Choose the session you want to submit an abstract. Please be assured that similar sessions will either be scheduled consecutively or merged once the abstract submission phase is completed.

Select your preferred presentation mode
Please visit the session format page to get a detailed view on the presentation timings
The final decision on oral/poster is made by the (Co-)Conveners and will be communicated via your My#IMC dashboard

Please add here your abstract meeting the following requirements:
NO REFERNCES/KEYWORDS/ACKNOWEDGEMENTS IN AN ABSTRACT!
Limits: min 100 words, max 350 words or 2500 characters incl. tabs
Criteria: use only UTF-8 HTML character set, no equations/special characters/coding
Copy/Paste from an external editor is possible but check/reformat your text before submitting (e.g. bullet points, returns, aso)

Add here affiliations (max. 30) for you and your co-author(s). Use the row number to assign the affiliation to you and your co-author(s).
When you hover over the row number you are able to change the order of the affiliation list.

1
2
3
1

Add here co-author(s) (max. 30) to your abstract. Please assign the affiliation(s) of each co-author in the "Assigned Aff. No" by using the corresponding numbers from the "Affiliation List" (e.g.: 1,2,...)
When you hover over the row number you are able to change the order of the co-author list.

1
2
3
4
5
1
1
2
3
4
5
1
Close