How do upland communities appropriate digital technologies to monitor and adapt to glacier melting? A literature review on the convergences and tensions between expert systems and Indigenous knowledge.

Abstract ID: 3.13507 | Accepted as Talk | Talk/Oral | TBA | TBA

Gianluca Iazzolino (0)
Gianluca Iazzolino (1)

1
(1) University of Manchester

(1) University of Manchester

Categories: Adaptation, Cryo- & Hydrosphere, Monitoring, Remote Sensing, Sustainable Development
Keywords: Glaciers, Digital, Communities, Upland, Indigenous

Categories: Adaptation, Cryo- & Hydrosphere, Monitoring, Remote Sensing, Sustainable Development
Keywords: Glaciers, Digital, Communities, Upland, Indigenous

Glaciers are a bellwether of climate change. Their critical role in the ecosystems of mountain regions has been emphasised by the United Nations, which has designated 2025 as the International Year of Glacier Preservation. Against this background, recent years have seen a proliferation of studies advocating for and assessing the application of digital technologies—including remote sensing, the Internet of Things, and, more recently, digital twins and AI/ML—to monitor glacier conditions and the broader impact of their melting on the ecosystem. At the same time, digital technologies have been deployed to support the adaptation strategies of upland communities, whose livelihoods are deeply intertwined with and dependent on glaciers, now increasingly threatened by their melting. This paper provides an overview of current research on the design and implementation of digital technologies for both monitoring and adaptation, with a specific focus on the interaction between expert systems and Indigenous knowledge. It identifies critical challenges and best practices in research-action across the Global North/Global South divide, raising questions about the involvement of mountain communities in both the active surveillance of glacier melting and the development of adaptation strategies. In doing so, it proposes a research agenda that applies a perspective grounded in the Social Appropriation of Technology and Indigenous Knowledge theories to explore how upland communities use digital technologies to interpret and adapt to major disruptions to their livelihoods.

N/A
NAME:
TBA
BUILDING:
TBA
FLOOR:
TBA
TYPE:
TBA
CAPACITY:
TBA
ACCESS:
TBA
ADDITIONAL:
TBA
FIND ME:
>> Google Maps

Limits: min. 3 words, max. 30 words or 200 characters

Choose the session you want to submit an abstract. Please be assured that similar sessions will either be scheduled consecutively or merged once the abstract submission phase is completed.

Select your preferred presentation mode
Please visit the session format page to get a detailed view on the presentation timings
The final decision on oral/poster is made by the (Co-)Conveners and will be communicated via your My#IMC dashboard

Please add here your abstract meeting the following requirements:
NO REFERNCES/KEYWORDS/ACKNOWEDGEMENTS IN AN ABSTRACT!
Limits: min 100 words, max 350 words or 2500 characters incl. tabs
Criteria: use only UTF-8 HTML character set, no equations/special characters/coding
Copy/Paste from an external editor is possible but check/reformat your text before submitting (e.g. bullet points, returns, aso)

Add here affiliations (max. 30) for you and your co-author(s). Use the row number to assign the affiliation to you and your co-author(s).
When you hover over the row number you are able to change the order of the affiliation list.

1
1

Add here co-author(s) (max. 30) to your abstract. Please assign the affiliation(s) of each co-author in the "Assigned Aff. No" by using the corresponding numbers from the "Affiliation List" (e.g.: 1,2,...)
When you hover over the row number you are able to change the order of the co-author list.

1
1
2
3
4
5
1
Close