How are scientific knowledge and risk management of glacial and periglacial processes influenced by Alpine catastrophic events ?

Abstract ID: 3.8743 | Accepted as Talk | Requested as: Talk | TBA | TBA

Juliette Bazin (1)
Ludovic, Ravanel (1); Sandrine, Caroly (2)

(1) Université Savoie Mont Blanc, Boulevard de la Mer Caspienne, 73370 Le Bourget du Lac, FR
(2) Université Grenoble Alpes, Avenue Félix Viallet, 38000 Grenoble, Isère, FR

Categories: Cryo- & Hydrosphere, Hazards, History
Keywords: Glacial Periglacial hazards, Risk management, Risk perception, European Alps, Geochronology

Categories: Cryo- & Hydrosphere, Hazards, History
Keywords: Glacial Periglacial hazards, Risk management, Risk perception, European Alps, Geochronology

Abstract

Mass movements of glacial and periglacial origin intensify with the climate crisis. Consequently, attempts are being made to inventory these events by hazard type or region. The scientific literature increasingly focuses on understanding causes, failure mechanisms, and propagation of recent and past events. Less attention is given to understanding and analysing risk management, which is the protection/prevention link between hazards and society.

We have therefore created an Alpine database of ice avalanches, GLOFs, debris flows, rock falls and rock avalanches that have threatened valleys in the last centuries. The selected events are those that required advanced scientific research and/or risk management in order to better understand glacial and periglacial processes. Our research aims to contextualize the events temporally, as they occur at given time and climate, and spatially, the high Alpine regions being distributed over different countries. We have also adopted a social approach since the events exist as elements perceived and interpreted by societies. Since a phenomenon becomes an event if society considers it to be a risk, we can ask ourselves how it is considered by society.

Through a geochronology derived from the database (c. 200 events selected in more than 120 watersheds), we try to understand how glacial and periglacial hazards are perceived and considered from the risk management perspective. Over the past 20 years, this management at national and international levels has intensified, moving from a local approach to a wider, organized, and multi-disciplinary approach.

Choose the session you want to submit an abstract. Please be assured that similar sessions will either be scheduled consecutively or merged once the abstract submission phase is completed.

Select your preferred presentation mode
Please visit the session format page to get a detailed view on the presentation timings
The final decision on oral/poster is made by the (Co-)Conveners and will be communicated via your My#IMC dashboard

Please add here your abstract meeting the following requirements:
NO REFERNCES/KEYWORDS/ACKNOWEDGEMENTS IN AN ABSTRACT!
Limits: min 100 words, max 350 words or 2500 characters incl. tabs
Criteria: use only UTF-8 HTML character set, no equations/special characters/coding
Copy/Paste from an external editor is possible but check/reformat your text before submitting (e.g. bullet points, returns, aso)

Add here affiliations (max. 30) for you and your co-author(s). Use the row number to assign the affiliation to you and your co-author(s).
When you hover over the row number you are able to change the order of the affiliation list.

1
2
1

Add here co-author(s) (max. 30) to your abstract. Please assign the affiliation(s) of each co-author in the "Assigned Aff. No" by using the corresponding numbers from the "Affiliation List" (e.g.: 1,2,...)
When you hover over the row number you are able to change the order of the co-author list.

1
2
1
1
2
3
4
5
1
Close