Geotechnical investigations of the 28 May 2025 landslide in Blatten, Valais, Switzerland

Abstract ID: 3.21269
| Accepted as Talk
| Abstract is registered
| 2025-09-18 09:45 - 09:50
Vicari, H. (1,2,3)
Gaume, J. (1,2,3)
(1) WSL Institute for Snow and Avalanche Research SLF, Flüelastrasse 11, 7260, Davos Dorf, CH
(2) Climate Change, Extremes, and Natural Hazards in Alpine Regions Research Center CERC, Flüelastrasse 11, 7260, Davos Dorf, CH
(3) Institute for Geotechnical Engineering, ETH Zürich, Zürich, CH
How to cite: Vicari, H.; Gaume, J.: Geotechnical investigations of the 28 May 2025 landslide in Blatten, Valais, Switzerland, International Mountain Conference 2025, Innsbruck, Sep 14 - 18 2025, #IMC25-3.21269, 2025.
Categories: Cryo- & Hydrosphere, Fieldwork, Hazards, Monitoring, Multi-scale Modeling
Keywords: Blatten avalanche, Geotechnical testing, Permeability, Material Point Method, Liquefaction
Categories: Cryo- & Hydrosphere, Fieldwork, Hazards, Monitoring, Multi-scale Modeling
Keywords: Blatten avalanche, Geotechnical testing, Permeability, Material Point Method, Liquefaction
Abstract
The content was (partly) adapted by AI
Download
Download
Content (partly) adapted by AI

On 28 May 2025, approximately 10 million m3 of rock, sediment, and ice mobilized from the Birch Glacier (Valais, Switzerland), triggering a landslide that destroyed much of the village of Blatten. Numerical simulations using a one-phase MPM model indicated that reproducing the observed runout required a low material friction angle (~13°), suggesting enhanced mobility possibly due to either low ice friction or liquefaction of water-saturated debris. To investigate these mechanisms, we conducted geotechnical field studies of the deposits, most notably near Weissenried (WR), where the landslide ran up nearly 200 m, and in the main deposit area in the Lonza valley (BL), specifically its southwestern and northeastern margins. Investigations targeted the uppermost 1 m of the deposit. Soil samples revealed a fine fraction of ~14% (silt and clay) alongside ~30% coarse gravel and cobbles. Dynamic cone penetration (DPL) tests showed low shear strength in wet sediments, whereas drier sediments exhibited higher resistance. WR deposits appeared drier and boulder-rich, while repeated DPL tests in BL showed temporal variability linked to rainfall and wetting–drying cycles. Field saturated hydraulic conductivity in BL, measured with SATURO tests, averaged 1.5 x 10-5 m/s, consistent with the relatively fine matrix. The geotechnical data suggest that (i) WR deposits are less saturated than those in BL, and (ii) BL deposits are undergoing compaction and/or moisture cycling. Rainfall infiltration before the event may have wetted the release mass enough for excess pore pressure generation. Hydro-geomechanical conditions indicate basal liquefaction was possible, though ice segregation and associated friction reduction may also have contributed to the large flow mobility. Determining the role of ice melting in generating pore water and weakening the basal layer remains an open and important question.

Daniel Farinotti (ETH Zürich): field visits organization and help with DPL testing. Friedrich Knuth (ETH Zürich): help with DPL testing on 12 July. Nicolas Oestreicher (SLF): DPL testing on 18 July. Ralf Herzog (ETH Zürich): GSD tests.