From communal lands to Ecosystem Services: A critical approach to silvopastoral governance through the case of Aterno Valley Model Forest

Abstract ID: 3.13106 | Not reviewed | Requested as: Talk | TBA | TBA

Annalisa Spalazzi (1)

(1) Gran Sasso Science Institute, viale Rendina 28, 67100 L'Aquila, IT

Categories: ES-Forests
Keywords: Ecosystem services, Depopulated areas, Forest, Wildfire, Communal lands

Categories: ES-Forests
Keywords: Ecosystem services, Depopulated areas, Forest, Wildfire, Communal lands

Abstract
The content was (partly) adapted by AI
Content (partly) adapted by AI

In the European South mountain areas, uncontrolled forest regrowth is heightening wildfire risks, exacerbated by rural depopulation and land abandonment. Italy’s in particular is a major wood importer, contributing to deforestation in the Global South, there is growing interest in valuing the non-use of forests through payment for ecosystem services (PES). This article critically examines the commodification of ecosystem services, such as carbon credits, which often prioritize global economic interests over local ecological and social needs. Italy’s mountain regions, where forest cover has expanded by 20% since 1990 due to agricultural abandonment, face a paradoxical socio-ecological crisis. This “green transition” masks challenges like biodiversity homogenization, increased wildfire vulnerability, and the collapse of traditional agrosilvopastoral systems. Institutional changes, including the dissolution of Collective Properties and reliance on Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) subsidies, have further worsened land mismanagement. This research, conducted through a one-year action-research project with the Aterno Valley Model Forest Association in Abruzzo, employs qualitative methods—participant observation, walking interviews, and focus groups—to explore how ecosystem services can aid in the recovery of abandoned lands and sustainable forest use. A global justice and decolonial framework ensures local perspectives are central. The study investigates collaborative governance models involving public, private, and communal actors, alongside agroecological practices that integrate sustainable forest management with extensive grazing to prevent scrub encroachment. Key findings highlight two barriers: (1) limited municipal capacity for investment and (2) challenges in creating sustainable grazing markets without heavy reliance on subsidies. Intermediary entities, such as the Model Forest, play a crucial role in fostering local experimentation and collaboration, though their impact often remains limited to advocacy. The study proposes structured supra-local Public-Commons Partnerships to support restoration in sparsely populated mountain areas, emphasizing the need for intermediary organizations and locally rooted partnerships. By advocating for governance models that prioritize local ecological knowledge and socio-economic equity, this research contributes to broader debates on global justice and decoloniality in mountain regions.

Choose the session you want to submit an abstract. Please be assured that similar sessions will either be scheduled consecutively or merged once the abstract submission phase is completed.

Select your preferred presentation mode
Please visit the session format page to get a detailed view on the presentation timings
The final decision on oral/poster is made by the (Co-)Conveners and will be communicated via your My#IMC dashboard

Please add here your abstract meeting the following requirements:
NO REFERNCES/KEYWORDS/ACKNOWEDGEMENTS IN AN ABSTRACT!
Limits: min 100 words, max 350 words or 2500 characters incl. tabs
Criteria: use only UTF-8 HTML character set, no equations/special characters/coding
Copy/Paste from an external editor is possible but check/reformat your text before submitting (e.g. bullet points, returns, aso)

Add here affiliations (max. 50) for you and your co-author(s). Use the row number to assign the affiliation to you and your co-author(s).
When you hover over the row number you are able to change the order of the affiliation list.

1
1

Add here co-author(s) (max. 50) to your abstract. Please assign the affiliation(s) of each co-author in the "Assigned Aff. No" by using the corresponding numbers from the "Affiliation List" (e.g.: 1,2,...)
When you hover over the row number you are able to change the order of the co-author list.

1

Each tag/name can exist of max. 3 single words

1
2
3
4
5
1
Close