Rural Development Implications of Divergent Agritourism Models: Comparing South Tyrol’s Accommodation Focus and Trentino’s Gastronomy Approach

Abstract ID: 3.12846 | Accepted as Talk | Talk/Oral | TBA | TBA

Nicola Miceli (0)
Fischer, Christian (1), Streifeneder, Thomas (2)
Nicola Miceli ((0) Free University of Bozen-Bolzano, Universitätsplatz 5 - piazza Università, 5, 39100, Bozen - Bolzano, BZ, IT)
Fischer, Christian (1), Streifeneder, Thomas (2)

(0) Free University of Bozen-Bolzano, Universitätsplatz 5 - piazza Università, 5, 39100, Bozen - Bolzano, BZ, IT
(1) Free University of Bozen-Bolzano, Universitätsplatz 5 - piazza Università, 5, 39100, Bozen - Bolzano, BZ, IT
(2) Eurac Research, Viale Druso 1, 39100 Bolzano (BZ), Italy

(1) Free University of Bozen-Bolzano, Universitätsplatz 5 - piazza Università, 5, 39100, Bozen - Bolzano, BZ, IT
(2) Eurac Research, Viale Druso 1, 39100 Bolzano (BZ), Italy

Categories: Agriculture, Culture, Economy, Sustainable Development, Tourism
Keywords: Agritourism, Culture, Rural Development, Sustainability, Tourism

Categories: Agriculture, Culture, Economy, Sustainable Development, Tourism
Keywords: Agritourism, Culture, Rural Development, Sustainability, Tourism

Agritourism is an increasingly important strategy for sustainable rural development in the Alpine region, but its models differ significantly across territories. In the neighbouring provinces of South Tyrol and Trentino, two distinct agritourism approaches have emerged: an accommodation-based model in South Tyrol and a gastronomy-focused model in Trentino. These differences reflect broader regional variations in cultural traditions, land use patterns, and policy frameworks. Understanding how these divergent agritourism models impact rural development is essential to designing effective, place-based policies for mountain areas.

This study aims to investigate the rural development implications of these two agritourism models, focusing on five dimensions: employment dynamics, local economic linkages, territorial identity and landscape preservation, resilience to shocks and seasonality, and institutional embeddedness. The research adopts a comparative case study approach, combining quantitative data from national and regional databases with qualitative insights from ten semi-structured expert interviews conducted in both regions.

Preliminary observations suggest that agritourism models in the two provinces may differ in their integration into local economies, labour structures, and capacity to preserve cultural landscapes. The interviews are expected to provide further insight into how institutional frameworks, branding strategies, and market profiles shape these outcomes.

The study will contribute to a more nuanced understanding of agritourism’s role in rural development, particularly in culturally and structurally diverse mountain contexts. Findings are expected to inform policy design and regional development strategies not only in the Alps but also in other mountain areas facing similar socio-economic and environmental challenges.

N/A
NAME:
TBA
BUILDING:
TBA
FLOOR:
TBA
TYPE:
TBA
CAPACITY:
TBA
ACCESS:
TBA
ADDITIONAL:
TBA
FIND ME:
>> Google Maps

Limits: min. 3 words, max. 30 words or 200 characters

Choose the session you want to submit an abstract. Please be assured that similar sessions will either be scheduled consecutively or merged once the abstract submission phase is completed.

Select your preferred presentation mode
Please visit the session format page to get a detailed view on the presentation timings
The final decision on oral/poster is made by the (Co-)Conveners and will be communicated via your My#IMC dashboard

Please add here your abstract meeting the following requirements:
NO REFERNCES/KEYWORDS/ACKNOWEDGEMENTS IN AN ABSTRACT!
Limits: min 100 words, max 350 words or 2500 characters incl. tabs
Criteria: use only UTF-8 HTML character set, no equations/special characters/coding
Copy/Paste from an external editor is possible but check/reformat your text before submitting (e.g. bullet points, returns, aso)

Add here affiliations (max. 30) for you and your co-author(s). Use the row number to assign the affiliation to you and your co-author(s).
When you hover over the row number you are able to change the order of the affiliation list.

1
2
1

Add here co-author(s) (max. 30) to your abstract. Please assign the affiliation(s) of each co-author in the "Assigned Aff. No" by using the corresponding numbers from the "Affiliation List" (e.g.: 1,2,...)
When you hover over the row number you are able to change the order of the co-author list.

1
2
1
1
2
3
4
5
1
Close