Exploring land cover patterns near the affected infrastructure after the wildfires in the Bio Bio region in Chile in February 2023

Abstract ID: 3.12674 | Accepted as Talk | Talk | TBA | TBA

Benedikt Hora (1)
Constanza González-Mathiesen (2), Tomás Tapia (4), Natalia Aravena-Solís (3)
(1) Universidad Mayor, Av. Alemania 281, 4780000 Temuco, CL
(2) Universidad del Desarrollo, Concepción, Chile
(3) Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago de Chile, Chile
(4) Universidad Austral de Chile, Valdivia, Chile

Categories: Agriculture
Keywords: Wildfires, Buffer risk analysis, Low mountains area, Risk managment

Categories: Agriculture
Keywords: Wildfires, Buffer risk analysis, Low mountains area, Risk managment

The content was (partly) adapted by AI
Content (partly) adapted by AI

This study analyzes land cover patterns in the Biobío region, Chile, which was heaviy affected by wildfires events in February 2023. The affected area is in the low mountain region of the Cordillera de la Costa in the Biobío region, in the south-central part of Chile. Using a GIS and remote sensing-based approach, it evaluates the influence of land cover on the severity of infrastructure damage. Wildfires in Chile have increased in intensity and frequency due to climate change and landscape characteristics. The wildland-urban interface (WUI) is particularly vulnerable, as it combines human settlements with highly flammable vegetation, such as forestry plantations. In this context, this study focuses on three severely affected municipalities: Nacimiento, Santa Juana, and Tomé, where significant destruction of homes and land was recorded. Using remote sensing data and spatial analysis, pre-fire land cover in affected and unaffected areas was examined. A buffer analysis around destroyed and undamaged buildings was applied to determine spatial relationships between land cover types and fire propagation. The results indicate that proximity to forestry plantations (predominantly eucalyptus and pine) significantly increased the likelihood of home destruction. Within a 30-meter buffer, the average proportion of forestry plantations was 51% in Nacimiento, 53% in Santa Juana, and 73% in Tomé, compared to significantly lower values in unaffected homes. In contrast, areas with agricultural and pasture mosaics exhibited a protective effect, with lower destruction rates. Findings suggest the need to integrate land-use planning into wildfire risk management by promoting natural barriers and reducing flammable vegetation near settlements. Public policies should include regulations on minimum distances between structures and forestry plantations, as well as incentives for the use of agricultural land and pasture as buffer zones. This study contributes to the literature on wildfires and risk management by providing a replicable framework for assessing the vulnerability of settlements in the wildland-urban interface. The integration of spatial data and proximity analysis enables the development of evidence-based mitigation strategies with applications in other fire-prone regions.

Choose the session you want to submit an abstract. Please be assured that similar sessions will either be scheduled consecutively or merged once the abstract submission phase is completed.

Select your preferred presentation mode
Please visit the session format page to get a detailed view on the presentation timings
The final decision on oral/poster is made by the (Co-)Conveners and will be communicated via your My#IMC dashboard

Please add here your abstract meeting the following requirements:
NO REFERNCES/KEYWORDS/ACKNOWEDGEMENTS IN AN ABSTRACT!
Limits: min 100 words, max 350 words or 2500 characters incl. tabs
Criteria: use only UTF-8 HTML character set, no equations/special characters/coding
Copy/Paste from an external editor is possible but check/reformat your text before submitting (e.g. bullet points, returns, aso)

Add here affiliations (max. 30) for you and your co-author(s). Use the row number to assign the affiliation to you and your co-author(s).
When you hover over the row number you are able to change the order of the affiliation list.

1
2
3
4
1

Add here co-author(s) (max. 30) to your abstract. Please assign the affiliation(s) of each co-author in the "Assigned Aff. No" by using the corresponding numbers from the "Affiliation List" (e.g.: 1,2,...)
When you hover over the row number you are able to change the order of the co-author list.

1
2
3
1
1
2
3
4
1
Close