Enhancing mountain precipitation insights via crowdsourcing and regional models

Abstract ID: 3.12514 | Accepted as Talk | Talk/Oral | TBA | TBA

Marie Pontoppidan (0)
Opach, Tomasz (1,2), Rød, Jan Ketil (1,3)
Marie Pontoppidan ((0) NORCE Norwegian Research Centre, Postboks 22 Nygårdstangen, 5838, Bergen, Norway, NO)
Opach, Tomasz (1,2), Rød, Jan Ketil (1,3)

(0) NORCE Norwegian Research Centre, Postboks 22 Nygårdstangen, 5838, Bergen, Norway, NO
(1) Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway
(2) University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland
(3) Norwegian Institute for Nature Research, Trondheim, Norway

(1) Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway
(2) University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland
(3) Norwegian Institute for Nature Research, Trondheim, Norway

Categories: Atmosphere, Cryo- & Hydrosphere, Fieldwork, Multi-scale Modeling
Keywords: Precipitation, Crowd-sourcing, Regional climate models, Citizen science, Observations

Categories: Atmosphere, Cryo- & Hydrosphere, Fieldwork, Multi-scale Modeling
Keywords: Precipitation, Crowd-sourcing, Regional climate models, Citizen science, Observations

Validating precipitation in high-resolution climate models is challenged by insufficient spatial and temporal observations, particularly for precipitation in complex and mountanious terrain. Traditional datasets, relying on sparse official weather stations and gridded observations, often lack the spatio-temporal resolution needed for accurate localized studies. This study is two-fold and investigates the potential of integrating Personal Weather Stations (PWSs) to enhance spatial precipitation distribution insights in complex terrain, and the potential to increased spatial datasets to validate regional climate models. 1) A case study of a convective burst also demonstrated the value of PWSs. The intense 45 minute event recorded precipitation of 55.8 mm at a PWS, compared to 28.1 mm at the nearest MET station, kilometers away. This highlighted PWSs ability to capture high localized variability and provided critical data during extreme events. 2) After a quality control, the precipitation from 87% of about 600 PWSs in Western Norway was meshed with 90 official meteorological stations. PWSs provided significantly improved spatial coverage, especially in populated areas, revealing spatial variability often missed by traditional gridded precipitation datasets. Simulations with the Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) regional climate model match observed spatial variability and thereby supports the reliability of PWS data. In conclusion, PWS networks significantly enhance observational coverage, aiding high-resolution model validation and local precipitation understanding. As PWS numbers grow, refined quality control measures will further solidify their role in meteorological research and emergency preparedness, particularly for localized extreme weather events in complex terrain.

N/A
NAME:
TBA
BUILDING:
TBA
FLOOR:
TBA
TYPE:
TBA
CAPACITY:
TBA
ACCESS:
TBA
ADDITIONAL:
TBA
FIND ME:
>> Google Maps

Limits: min. 3 words, max. 30 words or 200 characters

Choose the session you want to submit an abstract. Please be assured that similar sessions will either be scheduled consecutively or merged once the abstract submission phase is completed.

Select your preferred presentation mode
Please visit the session format page to get a detailed view on the presentation timings
The final decision on oral/poster is made by the (Co-)Conveners and will be communicated via your My#IMC dashboard

Please add here your abstract meeting the following requirements:
NO REFERNCES/KEYWORDS/ACKNOWEDGEMENTS IN AN ABSTRACT!
Limits: min 100 words, max 350 words or 2500 characters incl. tabs
Criteria: use only UTF-8 HTML character set, no equations/special characters/coding
Copy/Paste from an external editor is possible but check/reformat your text before submitting (e.g. bullet points, returns, aso)

Add here affiliations (max. 30) for you and your co-author(s). Use the row number to assign the affiliation to you and your co-author(s).
When you hover over the row number you are able to change the order of the affiliation list.

1
2
3
1

Add here co-author(s) (max. 30) to your abstract. Please assign the affiliation(s) of each co-author in the "Assigned Aff. No" by using the corresponding numbers from the "Affiliation List" (e.g.: 1,2,...)
When you hover over the row number you are able to change the order of the co-author list.

1
2
1
1
2
3
4
5
1
Close