Does native diversity prevent plant invasions in mountains?

Abstract ID: 3.12250 | Not reviewed | Requested as: Talk | TBA | TBA

Noemi Katalin Kreuz (1)
Meike, Buhaly (1,2); Sophia Carmel, Turner (1); Benedikt, Veltmann (1); Sylvia, Haider (1)

(1) Leuphana University of Lüneburg, Universitätsallee 1, 21335 Lüneburg, Germany
(2) Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Universitätsplatz 10, 06108 Halle (Saale), Germany

Categories: Biodiversity, Ecosystems
Keywords: biotic resistance hypothesis, diversity-invasibility hypothesis, MIREN, roadsides, mountain plant diversity

Categories: Biodiversity, Ecosystems
Keywords: biotic resistance hypothesis, diversity-invasibility hypothesis, MIREN, roadsides, mountain plant diversity

Abstract

Mountain ecosystems are increasingly affected by plant invasions, with non-native species spreading to high elevations. The biotic resistance hypothesis suggests that diverse native communities may limit invasions, yet numerous studies have reported conflicting results. While previous studies attempted to explain these contradictory results using spatial scale, in this study we focused on how environmental gradients and human disturbance associated with mountain roads influence the relationship between native and non-native diversity. To accomplish this, we used a global dataset of standardized vegetation surveys from 15 mountain regions along elevation gradients to analyze at the community level the effects of native species richness and native functional diversity on the number of non-native species.

Our findings revealed a moderation of the biotic resistance hypothesis: at high elevations, we found no evidence of biotic resistance, as non-native species richness was positively associated with native diversity in both natural and roadside habitats. However, at low elevations, communities with high native functional diversity exhibited stronger resistance to invasions, but only in natural habitats. We also found that the ratio of non-native species in natural habitats compared to roadside habitats was high at both low and high elevations, with a drop at mid elevations. This indicates that areas with high non-native richness and introduction rates, like those at low elevations, are more likely to see percolation of non-natives into natural habitats. Additionally, at high elevations, species capable of reaching these more remote environments could have traits associated with spread, and could therefore more readily shift from roadside to natural habitats.

These findings suggest that as climate change weakens environmental barriers and increasing traffic transports more propagules to high elevations, plant invasions into mountain ecosystems will likely accelerate. We conclude that once non-native species reach high elevations, which typically takes place along dispersal pathways such as roads, native plant diversity might not be able to resist their spread into natural plant communities. Therefore, monitoring and management strategies should focus on reducing propagule pressure and minimizing disturbance in vulnerable high-elevation ecosystems to mitigate future invasions.

Choose the session you want to submit an abstract. Please be assured that similar sessions will either be scheduled consecutively or merged once the abstract submission phase is completed.

Select your preferred presentation mode
Please visit the session format page to get a detailed view on the presentation timings
The final decision on oral/poster is made by the (Co-)Conveners and will be communicated via your My#IMC dashboard

Please add here your abstract meeting the following requirements:
NO REFERNCES/KEYWORDS/ACKNOWEDGEMENTS IN AN ABSTRACT!
Limits: min 100 words, max 350 words or 2500 characters incl. tabs
Criteria: use only UTF-8 HTML character set, no equations/special characters/coding
Copy/Paste from an external editor is possible but check/reformat your text before submitting (e.g. bullet points, returns, aso)

Add here affiliations (max. 30) for you and your co-author(s). Use the row number to assign the affiliation to you and your co-author(s).
When you hover over the row number you are able to change the order of the affiliation list.

1
2
1

Add here co-author(s) (max. 30) to your abstract. Please assign the affiliation(s) of each co-author in the "Assigned Aff. No" by using the corresponding numbers from the "Affiliation List" (e.g.: 1,2,...)
When you hover over the row number you are able to change the order of the co-author list.

1
2
3
4
1
1
2
3
4
5
1
Close