Do tree ring data reflect contrasting climate sensitivity in a Himalayan treeline ecotone? A comparison of Abies spectabilis (D. Don) Mirb. and Rhododendron campanulatum (D. Don)

Abstract ID: 3.13010 | Accepted as Talk | Talk/Oral | TBA | TBA

Amrit Maharjan (0)
Schwab, Niels (1), Böhner, Jürgen (1), Scholten, Thomas (2), Chaudhary, Ram Prasad (3), Adhikari, Rabindra (1,4), Subedi, Chandra Kanta (3), Schickhoff, Udo (1)
Amrit Maharjan (1)
Schwab, Niels (1), Böhner, Jürgen (1), Scholten, Thomas (2), Chaudhary, Ram Prasad (3), Adhikari, Rabindra (1,4), Subedi, Chandra Kanta (3), Schickhoff, Udo (1)

1
(1) University of Hamburg, Bundesstr.55, 20146, Hamburg, Germany
(2) University of Tuebingen, Ruemelinstr. 19-23, Tuebingen, Germany
(3) Tribhuvan University, Kirtipur, Nepal
(4) Tribhuvan University, Pokhara, Nepal

(1) University of Hamburg, Bundesstr.55, 20146, Hamburg, Germany
(2) University of Tuebingen, Ruemelinstr. 19-23, Tuebingen, Germany
(3) Tribhuvan University, Kirtipur, Nepal
(4) Tribhuvan University, Pokhara, Nepal

Categories: Biodiversity, Ecosystems, Paleoclimatology
Keywords: Subalpine Forest, Dendroclimatology, Treeline

Categories: Biodiversity, Ecosystems, Paleoclimatology
Keywords: Subalpine Forest, Dendroclimatology, Treeline

High elevation ecosystems are among the most vulnerable to climate change. Climatic treelines are expected to shift to higher elevations due to the tight coupling between treeline position and temperature. However, tree species within treeline ecotones may show diverging sensitivities to changes in temperature and precipitation, resulting in altered competitive relationships and ultimately affecting treeline dynamics. Using a dendroclimatology approach, we compared tree growth-climate relationships of Abies spectabilis and Rhododendron campanulatum, two dominant species of Central Himalayan treeline ecotones. We correlated tree ring widths with monthly and seasonal climate data including the Standardized Precipitation-Evapotranspiration Index (SPEI). The moving correlation and response function analysis revealed inconsistent tree growth-climate relationships across time. We found contrasting patterns of climate sensitivity: Abies spectabilis exhibited a strong negative response to pre-monsoon season (March-May) temperature, especially in recent decades, potentially linked to increased drought stress as indicated by responses to precipitation and SPEI. In contrast, Rhododendron campanulatum showed growth responses to temperature of all seasons, especially winter (December-February) and late summer (June-August). Signs of drought stress are less pronounced in comparison to Abies spectabilis. Tree growth–climate correlations are more stable over time indicating greater resilience to climatic variability compared to Abies spectabilis. This difference in climate sensitivity suggests that Abies spectabilis may be more vulnerable to currently changing climate conditions, while Rhododendron campanulatum may be more resilient to climate variability. These findings have important implications for understanding and forecasting the effects of climate change on Himalayan treeline dynamics. A potential expansion of Rhododendron campanulatum expansion relative to Abies spectabilis under predicted warming scenarios could significantly alter the structure and function of Himalayan treeline ecotones.

N/A
NAME:
TBA
BUILDING:
TBA
FLOOR:
TBA
TYPE:
TBA
CAPACITY:
TBA
ACCESS:
TBA
ADDITIONAL:
TBA
FIND ME:
>> Google Maps

Limits: min. 3 words, max. 30 words or 200 characters

Choose the session you want to submit an abstract. Please be assured that similar sessions will either be scheduled consecutively or merged once the abstract submission phase is completed.

Select your preferred presentation mode
Please visit the session format page to get a detailed view on the presentation timings
The final decision on oral/poster is made by the (Co-)Conveners and will be communicated via your My#IMC dashboard

Please add here your abstract meeting the following requirements:
NO REFERNCES/KEYWORDS/ACKNOWEDGEMENTS IN AN ABSTRACT!
Limits: min 100 words, max 350 words or 2500 characters incl. tabs
Criteria: use only UTF-8 HTML character set, no equations/special characters/coding
Copy/Paste from an external editor is possible but check/reformat your text before submitting (e.g. bullet points, returns, aso)

Add here affiliations (max. 30) for you and your co-author(s). Use the row number to assign the affiliation to you and your co-author(s).
When you hover over the row number you are able to change the order of the affiliation list.

1
2
3
4
1

Add here co-author(s) (max. 30) to your abstract. Please assign the affiliation(s) of each co-author in the "Assigned Aff. No" by using the corresponding numbers from the "Affiliation List" (e.g.: 1,2,...)
When you hover over the row number you are able to change the order of the co-author list.

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
1
1
2
3
1
Close