Do donkeys grazing in woody-encroached Alpine pastures behave as mixed-feeders? A case study from Gran Paradiso National Park

Abstract ID: 3.14055 | Accepted as Talk | Talk | TBA | TBA

Jacopo Volpe (1)
Marco Pittarello (1), Ginevra Nota (1), Michele Lonati (1), Giampiero Lombardi (1)
(1) University of Turin, Largo Paolo Braccini 2, 10095, Grugliasco, Italy

Categories: Agriculture
Keywords: Agroforestry, Feeding preferences, Fodder trees, Silvopastoral systems, Alps

Categories: Agriculture
Keywords: Agroforestry, Feeding preferences, Fodder trees, Silvopastoral systems, Alps

Since the 1950s, land abandonment has led to extensive encroachment of woody species – mainly shrubs and trees – on alpine grasslands, resulting in a marked decline in both forage quality and quantity. In response, silvopastoral systems involving livestock browsing woody vegetation, such as donkeys, have emerged as a promising tool for grassland restoration. The research was guided by three key questions: (1) do donkeys maintain a mixed diet that includes both herbaceous and woody plant species? (2) Are certain plant taxa selectively preferred or avoided? (3) Does the relative consumption of woody species reflect their environmental abundance? Aiming to answer these questions, the study investigated the foraging behaviour of a herd of 18 donkeys grazing an 11-ha pasture in Gran Paradiso National Park (NW Italy) during summer 2023. A total of 6,472 direct observations were conducted at a 15-second recording interval followed by a 20-second pause, with feeding stations defined as the spatial volume extending 2 meters above ground level and a 0.5-meter radius around the animal mouth. Both available and consumed plant species were recorded at species level, unless for the broad category ‘herbaceous species’. Relationships between availability and consumption were modelled using Generalised Additive Models (GAMs) and further explored using cluster analysis, which delineated three groups of plants: preferred, indifferently consumed, and rejected. The results showed that donkeys consumed predominantly herbaceous forage – which accounted for 66 to 96% of their diet – although they were also able to browse woody species and ferns (0-22%). Particularly, they showed a marked preference for Sorbus aria and Rubus idaeus, while largely avoiding other species, e.g. Betula pendula. Furthermore, the consumption of several species – especially Alnus viridis and Athyrium filix-femina – was directly related to their availability in the environment and increased proportionally as these species became more abundant. These results suggest that integrating donkeys into grazing management strategies may help mitigate woody encroachment, support biodiversity, and improve forage quality.

N/A
NAME:
TBA
BUILDING:
TBA
FLOOR:
TBA
TYPE:
TBA
CAPACITY:
TBA
ACCESS:
TBA
ADDITIONAL:
TBA
FIND ME:
>> Google Maps

Choose the session you want to submit an abstract. Please be assured that similar sessions will either be scheduled consecutively or merged once the abstract submission phase is completed.

Select your preferred presentation mode
Please visit the session format page to get a detailed view on the presentation timings
The final decision on oral/poster is made by the (Co-)Conveners and will be communicated via your My#IMC dashboard

Please add here your abstract meeting the following requirements:
NO REFERNCES/KEYWORDS/ACKNOWEDGEMENTS IN AN ABSTRACT!
Limits: min 100 words, max 350 words or 2500 characters incl. tabs
Criteria: use only UTF-8 HTML character set, no equations/special characters/coding
Copy/Paste from an external editor is possible but check/reformat your text before submitting (e.g. bullet points, returns, aso)

Add here affiliations (max. 30) for you and your co-author(s). Use the row number to assign the affiliation to you and your co-author(s).
When you hover over the row number you are able to change the order of the affiliation list.

1
1

Add here co-author(s) (max. 30) to your abstract. Please assign the affiliation(s) of each co-author in the "Assigned Aff. No" by using the corresponding numbers from the "Affiliation List" (e.g.: 1,2,...)
When you hover over the row number you are able to change the order of the co-author list.

1
2
3
4
1
1
2
3
4
5
1
Close