Diasporas and multispecific commons. How to stay rooted (comparative analysis Switzerland-Morocco)
Assigned Session: FS 3.213: New relations between humans and other than humans in mountain territories
Abstract ID: 3.11925 | Not reviewed | Requested as: Talk | TBA | TBA
David Goeury (1)
(1) HES-SO Genève, Rue Prévost-Martin 28, 1205 Genève, CH
Abstract
Mountain regions have preserved a large number of commons managed by collective organisations known as bourgeoisies in Switzerland and jemaa in Morocco. These commons (pastures, forests, irrigation networks, mills) were essential to the survival of the group and enabled communities to manage complex resources that were subject to seasonal and inter-annual hazards depending on climatic fluctuations. Today, they are being reinvented in a context of diaspora around emblematic animals and plants. Since the second half of the 20th century, in many mountain communities, farming has become financially secondary to other economic opportunities. The majority of those with rights to common land now have professional activities in major cities, sometimes several hundred or even thousands of kilometres away from their original territory. However, land commonholdings have not systematically disappeared, as they embody a deep-rooted link with the land. In the Val d’Anniviers in Switzerland, for example, the collective cowsheds set up in the 1960s enable entitled farmers to keep a few cows and take part in the alpine pasture and queen competitions. In this way, they support the last ‘real farmers’. In Morocco, in the Anti-Atlas, those with rights who have settled in the major Moroccan and European cities are involved in the collective planting of fruit trees (argan trees, olive trees, almond trees). They include new joint public projects run by ministries and development agencies for the benefit of local women’s cooperatives producing local produce. Comparative analysis allows us to rethink the human-non-human relationship that is at play in mountain areas around common goods. Thanks to these new multi-species commons, diaspora right-holders maintain a strong link with their homeland. The animals and plants allow them to remain rooted despite their distance, and also to remain a player in local territorial development according to principles linking solidarity, development and preservation of the environment.
N/A | ||||||||
|