Designing recurrent participatory research processes in Long-Term Socio-Ecological Research (LTSER) platforms using the example of the LTSER platform Eisenwurzen

Abstract ID: 3.12093 | Accepted as Talk | Talk/Oral | TBA | TBA

Hannah Politor (0)
Kirchweger, Stefan, Gaube, Veronika (1)
Hannah Politor ((0) Studienzentrum für Internationale Analysen (STUDIA Schlierbach), Panoramaweg 1, 4553, Schlierbach, , AT)
Kirchweger, Stefan, Gaube, Veronika (1)

(0) Studienzentrum für Internationale Analysen (STUDIA Schlierbach), Panoramaweg 1, 4553, Schlierbach, , AT
(1) BOKU University, Gregor-Mendel-Straße 33, 1180 Wien, Austria

(1) BOKU University, Gregor-Mendel-Straße 33, 1180 Wien, Austria

Categories: Socio-Ecology
Keywords: participatory research design, LTSER platforms, Eisenwurzen

Categories: Socio-Ecology
Keywords: participatory research design, LTSER platforms, Eisenwurzen

The content was (partly) adapted by AI
Content (partly) adapted by AI

In the context of long-term socio-ecological research (LTSER), a systematic observation and analysis of changes in socio-ecological systems is conducted over extended periods. The diverse research projects undertaken in LTSER platforms depend on repeated engagement of various actors. The involvement of non-academic actors in scientific research processes harbours many challenges, one of which is ‘stakeholder fatigue’. To tackle this and other challenges, it is necessary to explore the factors that facilitate or hinder engagement in research processes and formulate proposals for designing research processes so that stakeholders from both academic and practical backgrounds are willing and able to maintain their commitment. This work addreses the following research questions: What are the prerequisites for a successful long-term relationship between actors from science and practice in participatory research like LTSER platforms? How does prior involvement in participatory research affect the willingness of actors in a region to participate in further research projects? Which criteria for the future design of participatory research methods and processes can be derived to ensure they remain beneficial and appealing to the relevant actors? These research questions are analysed in the Eisenwurzen LTSER platform, where stakeholders have been actively involved in the development of the platform for over two decades, and have since participated in many individual projects. Semi-structured interviews are conducted with actors from selected projects as well as with key players from the platform. The interviews will be analysed using qualitative content analysis. Criteria and principles from extant literature will be considered to examine their suitability for the repeated involvement of stakeholders in the transdisciplinary research process. The success factors and inhibitors of participatory research processes will be explored, and the impact of projects will be analysed in terms of their contribution to solving the lifeworld problems of the actors involved. Preliminary findings suggest that participants value the opportunities for exchange, networking, and external input offered by engagement in participatory research. This work aims to contribute to the understanding of how to sustain long-term engagement in LTSER platforms and improve the design of participatory research processes to make them more effective and appealing to all stakeholders involved.

N/A
NAME:
TBA
BUILDING:
TBA
FLOOR:
TBA
TYPE:
TBA
CAPACITY:
TBA
ACCESS:
TBA
ADDITIONAL:
TBA
FIND ME:
>> Google Maps

Limits: min. 3 words, max. 30 words or 200 characters

Choose the session you want to submit an abstract. Please be assured that similar sessions will either be scheduled consecutively or merged once the abstract submission phase is completed.

Select your preferred presentation mode
Please visit the session format page to get a detailed view on the presentation timings
The final decision on oral/poster is made by the (Co-)Conveners and will be communicated via your My#IMC dashboard

Please add here your abstract meeting the following requirements:
NO REFERNCES/KEYWORDS/ACKNOWEDGEMENTS IN AN ABSTRACT!
Limits: min 100 words, max 350 words or 2500 characters incl. tabs
Criteria: use only UTF-8 HTML character set, no equations/special characters/coding
Copy/Paste from an external editor is possible but check/reformat your text before submitting (e.g. bullet points, returns, aso)

Add here affiliations (max. 30) for you and your co-author(s). Use the row number to assign the affiliation to you and your co-author(s).
When you hover over the row number you are able to change the order of the affiliation list.

1
1

Add here co-author(s) (max. 30) to your abstract. Please assign the affiliation(s) of each co-author in the "Assigned Aff. No" by using the corresponding numbers from the "Affiliation List" (e.g.: 1,2,...)
When you hover over the row number you are able to change the order of the co-author list.

1
2
1
1
2
3
1
Close