Could LiDAR data enhance the identification of alpine-treeline ecotones? A case study in the Mont Blanc massif

Abstract ID: 3.12226 | Accepted as Poster | Poster | TBA | TBA

Chiara D'angeli (0)
Chassagneux, Agathe (3), Delestrade, Anne (3), Stanisci, Angela (2), Froidevaux, Jérémy S.P. (4)
Chiara D'angeli (1,2)
Chassagneux, Agathe (3), Delestrade, Anne (3), Stanisci, Angela (2), Froidevaux, Jérémy S.P. (4)

1,2
(1) ISPRA - Italian Institute for Environmental Protection and Research, Via V. Brancati, 48, 00144 Rome, Italy
(2) University of Molise - Department of Biosciences and Territory, Contrada Fonte 7 Lappone, I-86090 Pesche, IS, Italy
(3) CREA Mont-Blanc Centre de Recherches sur les Écosystèmes d’Altitude, Observatoire du Mont-Blanc 67, lacets du Belvédère 74400 Chamonix Mont-Blanc France
(4) Université de Franche-Comté, CNRS, Chrono-environnement, 16 route de Gray 25030 Besançon Cedex France

(1) ISPRA - Italian Institute for Environmental Protection and Research, Via V. Brancati, 48, 00144 Rome, Italy
(2) University of Molise - Department of Biosciences and Territory, Contrada Fonte 7 Lappone, I-86090 Pesche, IS, Italy
(3) CREA Mont-Blanc Centre de Recherches sur les Écosystèmes d’Altitude, Observatoire du Mont-Blanc 67, lacets du Belvédère 74400 Chamonix Mont-Blanc France
(4) Université de Franche-Comté, CNRS, Chrono-environnement, 16 route de Gray 25030 Besançon Cedex France

Categories: Biodiversity, Conservation, Ecosystems, Fieldwork, Remote Sensing
Keywords: treeline ecotones, LiDAR data, habitat mapping, Mont Blanc massif

Categories: Biodiversity, Conservation, Ecosystems, Fieldwork, Remote Sensing
Keywords: treeline ecotones, LiDAR data, habitat mapping, Mont Blanc massif

Ecotones, defined as transition areas between two biomes, are often considered as biodiversity hotspots due to the overlap of species from adjacent ecosystems. This is particularly evident in alpine-treeline ecotones, which form the transition between closed forests at lower elevations and open alpine areas at higher altitudes. Their high species richness is further amplified by the complex topography of mountain regions, creating a mosaic of microhabitats with varying climatic and environmental conditions. Treeline ecotones are also highly sensitive to climate change, as rising temperatures drive an upward shift of the forest boundary. Given their ecological significance and vulnerability, accurately mapping and monitoring these areas is crucial for understanding their spatiotemporal dynamics. However, identifying treeline ecotones remains a challenge: since ecotones are dynamic habitats in both space and time, it is not easy to delimit them. To address this, we propose a novel methodology that combines LiDAR data and field surveys to map and characterize treeline ecotones in mountain areas. Three study areas were selected within the French side of the Mont Blanc massif: Loriaz, Peclerey and Plan de l’Aiguille. A hierarchical sampling protocol was designed to capture key vegetation characteristics above and below the treeline. Sampling points were selected using a random stratified approach, based on the habitat map of the Chamonix valley and on the Canopy Height Model (CHM) derived from LiDAR data. Vegetation surveys were carried out within 10 x 10 m plots, where structural and compositional attributes of the vegetation were measured. During the 2024 summer season, 54 field vegetation surveys were conducted along 6 transects within the three study areas. Five EUNIS habitat types were identified: S22 Alpine and subalpine ericoid heath; S25 Subalpine and subarctic deciduous scrub; T311 Alpine and Carpathian subalpine Picea forests and T343 Western Larix, mountain pine and Pinus cembra forests. Preliminary analyses combining field and LiDAR data suggest that LiDAR-derived canopy height appears to be a good predictor of forests and shrubs. These findings highlight the potential of LiDAR data for refining the mapping of treeline ecotones and providing a more reliable framework for long-term monitoring of these sensitive ecosystems.

N/A
NAME:
TBA
BUILDING:
TBA
FLOOR:
TBA
TYPE:
TBA
CAPACITY:
TBA
ACCESS:
TBA
ADDITIONAL:
TBA
FIND ME:
>> Google Maps

Limits: min. 3 words, max. 30 words or 200 characters

Choose the session you want to submit an abstract. Please be assured that similar sessions will either be scheduled consecutively or merged once the abstract submission phase is completed.

Select your preferred presentation mode
Please visit the session format page to get a detailed view on the presentation timings
The final decision on oral/poster is made by the (Co-)Conveners and will be communicated via your My#IMC dashboard

Please add here your abstract meeting the following requirements:
NO REFERNCES/KEYWORDS/ACKNOWEDGEMENTS IN AN ABSTRACT!
Limits: min 100 words, max 350 words or 2500 characters incl. tabs
Criteria: use only UTF-8 HTML character set, no equations/special characters/coding
Copy/Paste from an external editor is possible but check/reformat your text before submitting (e.g. bullet points, returns, aso)

Add here affiliations (max. 30) for you and your co-author(s). Use the row number to assign the affiliation to you and your co-author(s).
When you hover over the row number you are able to change the order of the affiliation list.

1
2
3
4
1

Add here co-author(s) (max. 30) to your abstract. Please assign the affiliation(s) of each co-author in the "Assigned Aff. No" by using the corresponding numbers from the "Affiliation List" (e.g.: 1,2,...)
When you hover over the row number you are able to change the order of the co-author list.

1
2
3
4
1
1
2
3
4
1
Close