Can grazing evidences be accurate proxies for stocking density? A case study from Gran Paradiso National Park validated with GPS collars

Abstract ID: 3.14065 | Accepted as Talk | Talk/Oral | TBA | TBA

Giorgio Gervasio (0)
Pittarello, Marco (1), Volpe, Jacopo (1), Lonati, Michele (1), Lombardi, Giampiero (1), Ravetto Enri, Simone (1)
Giorgio Gervasio ((0) University of Turin, Largo Paolo Braccini, 2, 10095, Grugliasco, TO, IT)
Pittarello, Marco (1), Volpe, Jacopo (1), Lonati, Michele (1), Lombardi, Giampiero (1), Ravetto Enri, Simone (1)

(0) University of Turin, Largo Paolo Braccini, 2, 10095, Grugliasco, TO, IT
(1) University of Turin, Largo Paolo Braccini, 2, 10095, Grugliasco, TO, IT

(1) University of Turin, Largo Paolo Braccini, 2, 10095, Grugliasco, TO, IT

Categories: Spatial Planning
Keywords: Alpine Grassland, Defoliation, Dung deposition, Pasture management, Trampling

Categories: Spatial Planning
Keywords: Alpine Grassland, Defoliation, Dung deposition, Pasture management, Trampling

Alpine pastures are fundamental resources for mountain farming systems, providing high-quality forage for livestock. Grazing activities – including defoliation, trampling, and dung deposition – significantly influence vegetation composition by depleting biomass and modifying nutrient availability. Such impacts on grassland ecosystems can considerably vary, depending on the diverse environmental conditions and stocking density. Understanding livestock distribution is therefore essential for developing effective management strategies to balance vegetation availability and livestock needs. However, obtaining precise data on livestock distribution remains challenging. Indeed, direct method, such as GPS collars, yield detailed insights into grazing patterns, even if their high cost and labor-intensive implementation prevent their widespread adoption. Indirect method, i.e. spatial modelling through distribution probability maps, may not account for all relevant variables. A study conducted in a summer pasture within Gran Paradiso National Park (NW Italy, 1800-2400 m a.s.l.) investigated an 83-hectare area exploited by 100 Pustertaler-Barà cattle (87 LU). To assess livestock distribution over a 75-day grazing period, GPS collars were deployed on 10 selected animals. At the conclusion of the season, field assessments recorded grazing evidences – defoliation, trampling, and dung deposition – on 715 regular ground control points, employing a five-grade scale (1 = absence, 5 = extreme). The study aimed to determine which of these indicators most accurately represented site-use intensity, based on GPS fixes recorded within 5-meter buffers around each control point. The findings demonstrated that the three grazing indicators effectively captured variations in pasture frequentation. Among them, defoliation proved to be the most reliable, pointing out clear distinctions in grazing intensity except at the highest level. Dung deposition also showed a suitable performance, while trampling proved to be less reliable in differentiating between moderate, high, or extreme intensities. These results highlight the value of easily observable grazing indicators as practical tools for assessing site-use intensity by grazing livestock in extensive alpine pastures. This approach presents an opportunity of supporting effective pasture management strategies, mitigating vegetation degradation and promoting the sustainable management of mountain farming systems.

N/A
NAME:
TBA
BUILDING:
TBA
FLOOR:
TBA
TYPE:
TBA
CAPACITY:
TBA
ACCESS:
TBA
ADDITIONAL:
TBA
FIND ME:
>> Google Maps

Limits: min. 3 words, max. 30 words or 200 characters

Choose the session you want to submit an abstract. Please be assured that similar sessions will either be scheduled consecutively or merged once the abstract submission phase is completed.

Select your preferred presentation mode
Please visit the session format page to get a detailed view on the presentation timings
The final decision on oral/poster is made by the (Co-)Conveners and will be communicated via your My#IMC dashboard

Please add here your abstract meeting the following requirements:
NO REFERNCES/KEYWORDS/ACKNOWEDGEMENTS IN AN ABSTRACT!
Limits: min 100 words, max 350 words or 2500 characters incl. tabs
Criteria: use only UTF-8 HTML character set, no equations/special characters/coding
Copy/Paste from an external editor is possible but check/reformat your text before submitting (e.g. bullet points, returns, aso)

Add here affiliations (max. 30) for you and your co-author(s). Use the row number to assign the affiliation to you and your co-author(s).
When you hover over the row number you are able to change the order of the affiliation list.

1
1

Add here co-author(s) (max. 30) to your abstract. Please assign the affiliation(s) of each co-author in the "Assigned Aff. No" by using the corresponding numbers from the "Affiliation List" (e.g.: 1,2,...)
When you hover over the row number you are able to change the order of the co-author list.

1
2
3
4
5
1
1
2
3
4
5
1
Close