Biotic-interactions of ericaceous shrubs: A global review and the mountain perspective

Abstract ID: 3.12371 | Accepted as Poster | Poster | TBA | TBA

Sonya Geange (0)
Bartholomée, Océane (1), Vandvik, Vigdis (2), Consortium, Shrubs (2)
Sonya Geange ((0) University of Bergen, Thormøhlens gate 53 A, 5006, Bergen, Vestland, NO)
Bartholomée, Océane (1), Vandvik, Vigdis (2), Consortium, Shrubs (2)

(0) University of Bergen, Thormøhlens gate 53 A, 5006, Bergen, Vestland, NO
(1) Lund University, Ekologihuset, Sölvegatan 37, Lund, Sweden
(2) University of Bergen, Thormøhlensgate 53A, Bergen, Norway

(1) Lund University, Ekologihuset, Sölvegatan 37, Lund, Sweden
(2) University of Bergen, Thormøhlensgate 53A, Bergen, Norway

Categories: Biodiversity, Ecosystems
Keywords: biodiversity, systematic review, shrub expansion, resilience

Categories: Biodiversity, Ecosystems
Keywords: biodiversity, systematic review, shrub expansion, resilience

Under climate change, shrub species are expanding their ranges further into mountain and arctic regions. Ericaceous shrubs in particular play a key role in maintaining ecosystem functions and services across diverse habitats, in part due to their biotic interactions. These same roles, ranging from contributing to competition and facilitation between plants, through to consumption of their leaves, seeds, pollen and nectar, and their unique associations with mycorrhizal fungi, may also make these shrub species vulnerable under global change, as trophic interactions may be reshaped. Here, we have conducted a literature synthesis investigating the diverse biotic interactions associated with ericaceous shrub communities around the globe. Focusing on mountain regions in particular, our research quantifies the regional and habitat-specific variations in how these shrubs provide ecosystem functions and services. We also document to what extent we understand how these roles may vary with the impacts of global change drivers, such as climate change, land use change, invasive species, and pollution. Together these insights will highlight both the potential new roles of these shrubs in mountain ecosystems as they expand their range, but also any potential vulnerabilities to varying global change drivers, enabling better research and management priorities to be identified. As our study is systematic and global in nature, we use bibliometrics analysis to identify the extent to which knowledge on biotic interactions is siloed, with certain biotic interactions only investigated in given regions, or habitats, limiting our capacity to draw more holistic conclusions about the true community and ecosystem impacts of ericaceous shrubs within their respective ecosystems. Through citation analyses we also assess how, and if, insights are being utilized in conservation efforts, or being included in larger-scale trophic modelling of global change responses. Lastly we will highlight publication research themes through time, identifying key knowledge gaps for future research efforts.

N/A
NAME:
TBA
BUILDING:
TBA
FLOOR:
TBA
TYPE:
TBA
CAPACITY:
TBA
ACCESS:
TBA
ADDITIONAL:
TBA
FIND ME:
>> Google Maps

Limits: min. 3 words, max. 30 words or 200 characters

Choose the session you want to submit an abstract. Please be assured that similar sessions will either be scheduled consecutively or merged once the abstract submission phase is completed.

Select your preferred presentation mode
Please visit the session format page to get a detailed view on the presentation timings
The final decision on oral/poster is made by the (Co-)Conveners and will be communicated via your My#IMC dashboard

Please add here your abstract meeting the following requirements:
NO REFERNCES/KEYWORDS/ACKNOWEDGEMENTS IN AN ABSTRACT!
Limits: min 100 words, max 350 words or 2500 characters incl. tabs
Criteria: use only UTF-8 HTML character set, no equations/special characters/coding
Copy/Paste from an external editor is possible but check/reformat your text before submitting (e.g. bullet points, returns, aso)

Add here affiliations (max. 30) for you and your co-author(s). Use the row number to assign the affiliation to you and your co-author(s).
When you hover over the row number you are able to change the order of the affiliation list.

1
2
1

Add here co-author(s) (max. 30) to your abstract. Please assign the affiliation(s) of each co-author in the "Assigned Aff. No" by using the corresponding numbers from the "Affiliation List" (e.g.: 1,2,...)
When you hover over the row number you are able to change the order of the co-author list.

1
2
3
1
1
2
3
4
1
Close