Back to the communities: sustainable approach to forest fire management in High-Altitude Regions of Nepal

Abstract ID: 3.10254 | Not reviewed | Requested as: Talk | TBA | TBA

Meena Bohara (1,2)
Rahul, Karki (1); Manish, Shrestha (1)

(1) ForestAction Nepal, Ashram Road, Bagdol, 44700, Lalitpur, Bagmati, NP
(2) Nepal Open University, Manbhawan, Dakshinkali Road, 44700, Bagmati, NP

Categories: Biodiversity, Conservation, Ecosystems, ES-Forests, Hazards
Keywords: Forest Fire, Community-led fire man, High-Altitude Ecosystems, Local Knowledge

Categories: Biodiversity, Conservation, Ecosystems, ES-Forests, Hazards
Keywords: Forest Fire, Community-led fire man, High-Altitude Ecosystems, Local Knowledge

Abstract

Forest fires pose a significant threat to ecosystems and livelihoods in Nepal’s high-altitude regions, driven by climate change and human activities. This study examines community perceptions, preparedness, and management strategies for forest fires in the Himalayan districts of Nepal. Taking the case of Sindhupalchowk and Dolakha districts, this paper aims to identify gaps and opportunities for strengthening community-led fire management.
This research draws on a mixed-method approach, integrating structured questionnaire surveys (n=87), key informant interviews, and focus group discussions. Stratified random sampling ensured inclusivity across gender, Indigenous status, and socio-economic vulnerability. The survey assessed local knowledge, perceptions, and responses to forest fire occurrences, causes, and management in four community forests in Sindhupalchowk and Dolakha participated in the study.
Findings reveal diverse socio-economic and ethnic backgrounds among participants, with indigenous and economically vulnerable households most affected by fires. While 98% of respondents acknowledged rising fire frequency and moderate to high fire severity, their knowledge of prevention and management strategies remained limited. The absence of formal coordination mechanisms resulted in fragmented responses and weak institutional support, leaving CFUGs as the primary actors in fire management. Major fire drivers included slash-and-burn agriculture, uncontrolled grazing, negligence, and limited awareness.
Despite these challenges, majority of the of community members (92%) expressed strong willingness to engage in fire mitigation efforts, provided they received adequate training, resources, and an organized coordination framework. This study underscores the urgent need for an integrated, community-led fire management approach that prioritizes local capacity building, fosters collaboration among community groups, and blends traditional knowledge with modern fire management practices. Strengthening legal frameworks and institutional support mechanisms is essential for enhancing fire management effectiveness.
The findings provide critical insights for policymakers, forest managers, and community leaders to design and implement more effective forest fire mitigation strategies.

Choose the session you want to submit an abstract. Please be assured that similar sessions will either be scheduled consecutively or merged once the abstract submission phase is completed.

Select your preferred presentation mode
Please visit the session format page to get a detailed view on the presentation timings
The final decision on oral/poster is made by the (Co-)Conveners and will be communicated via your My#IMC dashboard

Please add here your abstract meeting the following requirements:
NO REFERNCES/KEYWORDS/ACKNOWEDGEMENTS IN AN ABSTRACT!
Limits: min 100 words, max 350 words or 2500 characters incl. tabs
Criteria: use only UTF-8 HTML character set, no equations/special characters/coding
Copy/Paste from an external editor is possible but check/reformat your text before submitting (e.g. bullet points, returns, aso)

Add here affiliations (max. 30) for you and your co-author(s). Use the row number to assign the affiliation to you and your co-author(s).
When you hover over the row number you are able to change the order of the affiliation list.

1
2
1

Add here co-author(s) (max. 30) to your abstract. Please assign the affiliation(s) of each co-author in the "Assigned Aff. No" by using the corresponding numbers from the "Affiliation List" (e.g.: 1,2,...)
When you hover over the row number you are able to change the order of the co-author list.

1
2
1
1
2
3
4
1
Close