Assessing the economic value of mountain forests as nature-based solutions for risk reduction against snow avalanches and rockfall

Abstract ID: 3.13176 | Accepted as Poster | Talk | TBA | TBA

Leon Bührle (1,2,3,4)
Kevin Helzel (2,3), Adrian Ringenbach (2,3,4), Alessandra Bottero (2,3), Tobias Kalt (5), Martina L. Hobi (5), Thomas Marke (6), Michaela Teich (1), Peter Bebi (2,3)
(1) Austrian Research Centre for Forests (BFW), Department of Natural Hazards, Innsbruck, Austria
(2) WSL Institute for Snow and Avalanche Research SLF, Davos, Switzerland
(3) Climate Change, Extremes and Natural Hazards in Alpine Regions Research Centre CERC, Davos, Switzerland
(4) ETH Zurich, Forest Resources Management, Institute of Terrestrial Ecosystems, Department of Environmental Systems Science, Zurich, Switzerland
(5) Swiss Federal Institute for Forest, Snow and Landscape Research WSL, Birmensdorf, Switzerland
(6) University of Insbruck, Department of Geography, Innsbruck, Austria

Categories: ES-Forests
Keywords: Protective forest, Risk reduction, Snow avalanches, Rockfall

Categories: ES-Forests
Keywords: Protective forest, Risk reduction, Snow avalanches, Rockfall

Mountain forests play a crucial role as nature-based solutions (NbS) in mitigating natural hazard risks in Alpine regions. Despite their importance, the economic value of these forests in risk reduction is rarely quantified in detailed analyses. Large-scale risk assessments have been conducted for snow avalanche and rockfall hazards regarding damage on buildings and infrastructure, yet a detailed, spatially explicit and large-scale direct economic valuation of the protective function of forests considering rockfall and avalanches remains lacking. To address this gap, we developed a framework to spatially quantify the economic value of forests in mitigating snow avalanche and rockfall risks within a 1,700km² region in Switzerland, where 32% of the area is forested and 60% of these forests serve a protective function. This framework includes: 1.) Deriving relevant forest parameters from high-resolution LiDAR data and stand maps. 2.) Computing avalanche and rockfall intensities using the corresponding physical models within the RAMMS suite, both with and without the effect of the forest cover. 3.) Assessing related risks under both scenarios using the EconoMe framework. Risk is the product of hazard, exposure and vulnerability, whereby hazard intensities are derived from RAMMS simulations, exposure considers the monetary value of buildings, roads, and human life, and vulnerability is assessed using damage functions. 4.) Calculating the risk difference between the two scenarios (with and without forest cover) which correspond to the benefit of the forest as risk reduction. We then assign the benefit value to the specific stand contributing considerably to the risk reduction. Our results highlight the crucial role of mountain forests as NbS for disaster risk reduction, revealing substantial variations in protective effects even within small areas. Our framework represents an important step toward an objective decision-support system (DSS) for identifying protective forests and assessing their economic value. The results are integrated into an interactive, cartographic web application (www.wsl.ch/de/projekte/mountex/), which facilitates knowledge transfer and supports practical decision-making. The framework provides a valuable basis for prioritizing management interventions, developing post as well as pre-management strategies for large-scale disturbances, and for planning additional technical measures to protect human life and infrastructure.

Choose the session you want to submit an abstract. Please be assured that similar sessions will either be scheduled consecutively or merged once the abstract submission phase is completed.

Select your preferred presentation mode
Please visit the session format page to get a detailed view on the presentation timings
The final decision on oral/poster is made by the (Co-)Conveners and will be communicated via your My#IMC dashboard

Please add here your abstract meeting the following requirements:
NO REFERNCES/KEYWORDS/ACKNOWEDGEMENTS IN AN ABSTRACT!
Limits: min 100 words, max 350 words or 2500 characters incl. tabs
Criteria: use only UTF-8 HTML character set, no equations/special characters/coding
Copy/Paste from an external editor is possible but check/reformat your text before submitting (e.g. bullet points, returns, aso)

Add here affiliations (max. 30) for you and your co-author(s). Use the row number to assign the affiliation to you and your co-author(s).
When you hover over the row number you are able to change the order of the affiliation list.

1
2
3
4
5
6
1

Add here co-author(s) (max. 30) to your abstract. Please assign the affiliation(s) of each co-author in the "Assigned Aff. No" by using the corresponding numbers from the "Affiliation List" (e.g.: 1,2,...)
When you hover over the row number you are able to change the order of the co-author list.

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
1
1
2
3
4
1
Close