Assessing Provenance Variation and Edaphic Influences on the Survival and Growth of Widdringtonia whytei (Mulanje cedar) in Malawi

Abstract ID: 3.8626 | Accepted as Poster | Talk | TBA | TBA

Innocent Julius Taulo (1)
Richard Jinks (2)
(1) Lilongwe University of Agriculture and Natural Resources, Bunda Campus, 0000 LILONGWE, MW
(2) Forestry Research UK, Surrey GU10, 4LH United Kingdom

Categories: Biodiversity, Conservation
Keywords: Mulanje cedar, Provenance trial, Soil nutrients, Growth assessment, Restoration

Categories: Biodiversity, Conservation
Keywords: Mulanje cedar, Provenance trial, Soil nutrients, Growth assessment, Restoration

Widdringtonia whytei (Mulanje cedar), a critically endangered conifer endemic to Malawi, is threatened by over-exploitation and habitat loss, necessitating effective reforestation strategies. The success of these efforts relies on selecting provenances that are well-suited to specific environmental conditions. This study assessed the survival and growth performance of three W. whytei provenances (Chikangawa, Tanzania, and Zomba) in a four-year-old provenance trial across five sites in Malawi (Mt Mulanje, Zomba and Dedza and Luwawa, & Chikangawa highlands). It also analyzed the relationship between key soil factors and provenance performance. A randomized complete block design was used with five blocks per site, each containing three treatments of 49 trees planted at a spacing of 2.75m x 2.75m. Measurements were taken from a core area of 25 trees within each plot to minimize edge effects. Tree height (m) and root collar diameter (RCD, cm) were accurately measured, and survival rates were determined by counting surviving trees per plot. Soil samples were collected randomly from each 5×5 plot at all five provenance trial plots at a depth of 0.15 meters, with six samples collected from each subplot. Soil pH, electrical conductivity (EC), organic carbon content, total nitrogen, exchangeable bases, cation exchange capacity (CEC), total organic carbon (TOC) and phosphorus levels were analyzed using standard operating procedure for soil analysis. Analysis of Variance ANOVA using Minitab 16.1 was used to analyze height and RCD data, with means separated by Fischer’s least significant difference (LSD) at the 0.05 level. Survival data was analyzed using percentages. Zomba provenance demonstrated the highest mean survival (66.2%), with highest survival (88.8%) at Luwawa and RCD growth (7.68 cm). Chikangawa showed the least RCD growth (1.57 cm) lower mean survival of 31.2%. Available phosphorus (P) varied significantly; Dedza recorded a mean of 32.5 mg/kg, while levels at Thuchira and Zomba were critically low, averaging 3.0 mg/kg. Total nitrogen (N) varied between 0.11% at Luwawa and 0.63% at Thuchira, indicating site-specific differences in nutrient availability. Provenance and soil conditions significantly affect W. whytei survival and growth, with Zomba generally superior. Soil pH and phosphorus are crucial; matching provenance to site is vital.

N/A
NAME:
TBA
BUILDING:
TBA
FLOOR:
TBA
TYPE:
TBA
CAPACITY:
TBA
ACCESS:
TBA
ADDITIONAL:
TBA
FIND ME:
>> Google Maps

Choose the session you want to submit an abstract. Please be assured that similar sessions will either be scheduled consecutively or merged once the abstract submission phase is completed.

Select your preferred presentation mode
Please visit the session format page to get a detailed view on the presentation timings
The final decision on oral/poster is made by the (Co-)Conveners and will be communicated via your My#IMC dashboard

Please add here your abstract meeting the following requirements:
NO REFERNCES/KEYWORDS/ACKNOWEDGEMENTS IN AN ABSTRACT!
Limits: min 100 words, max 350 words or 2500 characters incl. tabs
Criteria: use only UTF-8 HTML character set, no equations/special characters/coding
Copy/Paste from an external editor is possible but check/reformat your text before submitting (e.g. bullet points, returns, aso)

Add here affiliations (max. 30) for you and your co-author(s). Use the row number to assign the affiliation to you and your co-author(s).
When you hover over the row number you are able to change the order of the affiliation list.

1
2
1

Add here co-author(s) (max. 30) to your abstract. Please assign the affiliation(s) of each co-author in the "Assigned Aff. No" by using the corresponding numbers from the "Affiliation List" (e.g.: 1,2,...)
When you hover over the row number you are able to change the order of the co-author list.

1
1
1
2
3
4
5
1
Close