Application of Climate-Smart Forestry in long-term experimental plots to analyze the management effects for forest resilience and climate adaptation

Abstract ID: 3.12398 | Accepted as Talk | Poster | TBA | TBA

Diana Alfieri (2)
Astor Toraño Caicoya (1), Giovanni Santopuoli (2), Roberto Tognetti (3)
(1) Technical University of Munich
(2) University of Molise
(3) University of Bolzano

Categories: Adaptation, Biodiversity, Monitoring
Keywords: indicators, long-term experiments, climate-smart forestry, monitoring, decision support tool

Categories: Adaptation, Biodiversity, Monitoring
Keywords: indicators, long-term experiments, climate-smart forestry, monitoring, decision support tool

In recent years, Climate-Smart Forestry (CSF) has emerged as an innovative approach for sustainable forest management, aiming to enhance forest resilience, mitigate greenhouse gas emissions, and balance the provision of ecosystem services in the face of climate change threats. This study employs a composite Climate-Smart Index (ICSF) to assess CSF in long-term experimental plots in Bavaria, characterized by Norway spruce and European beech with different silvicultural treatments (e.g., low thinning, strong thinning, no thinning) and species mixing. Using historical data, the ICSF index allows us to compare these management options in terms of mitigation and adaptation over time. The study aims to answer the following questions: (i) which forest types have higher levels of smartness) (ii) how do different management options affect the ICSF over time? (iii) which indicators have the greatest influence on ICSF trends? The approach includes the (i) selection, (ii) normalization, (iii) weighting, and (iv) aggregation of CSF indicators. Eight indicators were selected and assessed for each plot (i.e., carbon stock, growing stock, diameter distribution, tree species composition, slenderness coefficient, forest damage, increment and felling, and regeneration). The Analytic Hierarchy Process was employed to weigh the indicators according to the preferences of CSF-expert stakeholders at both indicators and criteria levels. Results indicate that mixed forests show higher smartness than monospecific forests, particularly due to greater adaptation capacity. Among management treatments, low thinning enhances smartness in beech forests, however differences in thinning intensity within the same species do not significantly impact the index. This suggests that tree species composition plays a more decisive role in determining forest smartness than silvicultural practices. Additionally, carbon stock, growing stock, and roundwood production emerge as the most influential indicators shaping smartness trends over time. This study will provide valuable insights for forest managers and policymakers, helping them to implement more effective strategies for the sustainable management of forests in the context of climate change.

Choose the session you want to submit an abstract. Please be assured that similar sessions will either be scheduled consecutively or merged once the abstract submission phase is completed.

Select your preferred presentation mode
Please visit the session format page to get a detailed view on the presentation timings
The final decision on oral/poster is made by the (Co-)Conveners and will be communicated via your My#IMC dashboard

Please add here your abstract meeting the following requirements:
NO REFERNCES/KEYWORDS/ACKNOWEDGEMENTS IN AN ABSTRACT!
Limits: min 100 words, max 350 words or 2500 characters incl. tabs
Criteria: use only UTF-8 HTML character set, no equations/special characters/coding
Copy/Paste from an external editor is possible but check/reformat your text before submitting (e.g. bullet points, returns, aso)

Add here affiliations (max. 30) for you and your co-author(s). Use the row number to assign the affiliation to you and your co-author(s).
When you hover over the row number you are able to change the order of the affiliation list.

1
2
3
1

Add here co-author(s) (max. 30) to your abstract. Please assign the affiliation(s) of each co-author in the "Assigned Aff. No" by using the corresponding numbers from the "Affiliation List" (e.g.: 1,2,...)
When you hover over the row number you are able to change the order of the co-author list.

1
2
3
1
1
2
3
4
5
1
Close