Analysing multi-hazard risk in the Alps by integrating Forensic Analysis and Impact Chains

Abstract ID: 3.12534 | Accepted as Talk | Talk/Oral | TBA | TBA

Silvia Cocuccioni (0)
Romagnoli, Federica (1), Olaya Calderon, Liz Jessica (1), Wenzel, Till (2), Atun, Funda (3), Schneiderbauer, Stefan (1,4,5), Pittore, Massimiliano (1)
Silvia Cocuccioni ((0) Eurac Research, Viale Druso 1, 39100, Bolzano, Italy, IT)
Romagnoli, Federica (1), Olaya Calderon, Liz Jessica (1), Wenzel, Till (2), Atun, Funda (3), Schneiderbauer, Stefan (1,4,5), Pittore, Massimiliano (1)

(0) Eurac Research, Viale Druso 1, 39100, Bolzano, Italy, IT
(1) Eurac Research, viale Druso 1, 39100, Bolzano, Italy
(2) University of Vienna, Universitätsstraße 7, 1010,Vienna, Austria
(3) University of Twente, 7522 Enschede, The Netherlands
(4) United Nations University- Institute for Environment and Human Security (UNU-EHS), Platz d. Vereinten Nationen 1, Bonn, Germany
(5) University of the Free State, Qwaqwa Campus, Bloemfontein, South Africa

(1) Eurac Research, viale Druso 1, 39100, Bolzano, Italy
(2) University of Vienna, Universitätsstraße 7, 1010,Vienna, Austria
(3) University of Twente, 7522 Enschede, The Netherlands
(4) United Nations University- Institute for Environment and Human Security (UNU-EHS), Platz d. Vereinten Nationen 1, Bonn, Germany
(5) University of the Free State, Qwaqwa Campus, Bloemfontein, South Africa

Categories: Adaptation, Hazards
Keywords: Multi-risk, DRR, Forensic analysis, Risk analysis, Alps

Categories: Adaptation, Hazards
Keywords: Multi-risk, DRR, Forensic analysis, Risk analysis, Alps

Enhancing our knowledge of how multiple hazards interact, trigger cascading impacts, and are influenced by societal processes is key to understanding risk in mountain regions. Analysing multiple hazards and their consequences in time over different sectors requires systemic approaches. To address this challenge, the Horizon Europe PARATUS project developed a framework integrating two approaches: (i) a structured methodology for forensic disaster analysis and (ii) impact chains. This integration provides deeper insights into disaster risk and cascading effects, learning from past events while offering a structured understanding of risk, combining the physical and social dimensions. Forensic disaster analysis systematically examines past events, focusing on socio-ecological dynamics, root causes, and human agency that contribute to risk materialization. This approach does not only document damages and losses but investigates different vulnerability dimensions and how these emerged pinpointing DRR measures undertaken to face the historical events as well as gaps which still need to be addressed to face current and future risks. By analysing policies, decisions, and systemic failures that influenced disaster outcomes, forensic analysis helps to identify weaknesses in risk management practices. Impact chains (ICs), provide a structured conceptual model to visualize the relationships between key risk components (hazard, exposure, and vulnerability) while capturing indirect and cascading consequences. ICs provide a general representation of different risk components interactions under current and future conditions, not focussing on a single past event but being informed by it. By making these interconnections explicit, ICs facilitate the identification of critical intervention points for disaster risk reduction. This integrated framework has been applied across diverse geographic and socio-economic contexts. With this contribution we present its application in the South-Eastern Alps. A general impact chain to describe current risks related to heavy rains and windstorms was developed, learning from past events such as the storm Vaia (2018) and other minor events which led to infrastructure failure and forest damage. The framework has proven effective in identifying systemic vulnerabilities and key lessons from past disaster events, enhancing disaster risk management of future extreme events.

N/A
NAME:
TBA
BUILDING:
TBA
FLOOR:
TBA
TYPE:
TBA
CAPACITY:
TBA
ACCESS:
TBA
ADDITIONAL:
TBA
FIND ME:
>> Google Maps

Limits: min. 3 words, max. 30 words or 200 characters

Choose the session you want to submit an abstract. Please be assured that similar sessions will either be scheduled consecutively or merged once the abstract submission phase is completed.

Select your preferred presentation mode
Please visit the session format page to get a detailed view on the presentation timings
The final decision on oral/poster is made by the (Co-)Conveners and will be communicated via your My#IMC dashboard

Please add here your abstract meeting the following requirements:
NO REFERNCES/KEYWORDS/ACKNOWEDGEMENTS IN AN ABSTRACT!
Limits: min 100 words, max 350 words or 2500 characters incl. tabs
Criteria: use only UTF-8 HTML character set, no equations/special characters/coding
Copy/Paste from an external editor is possible but check/reformat your text before submitting (e.g. bullet points, returns, aso)

Add here affiliations (max. 30) for you and your co-author(s). Use the row number to assign the affiliation to you and your co-author(s).
When you hover over the row number you are able to change the order of the affiliation list.

1
2
3
4
5
1

Add here co-author(s) (max. 30) to your abstract. Please assign the affiliation(s) of each co-author in the "Assigned Aff. No" by using the corresponding numbers from the "Affiliation List" (e.g.: 1,2,...)
When you hover over the row number you are able to change the order of the co-author list.

1
2
3
4
5
6
1
1
2
3
4
5
1
Close