Revisiting Mercanton’s Visionary Experiment on the Rhône Glacier with a Numerical Model

Abstract ID: 28.7304 | Accepted as Talk | Talk/Oral | 2025-02-28 11:30 - 11:45 | Ágnes‐Heller‐Haus/Small Lecture Room

Guillaume Jouvet (0)
Zryd, Amédée (1)
Guillaume Jouvet (1)
Zryd, Amédée (1)

1
(1) University of Lausanne, Quartier Mouline, 1015 lausanne, Switzerland

(1) University of Lausanne, Quartier Mouline, 1015 lausanne, Switzerland

Categories: Cryospheric Processes, Modelling
Keywords: Numerical model, Particle tracking

Categories: Cryospheric Processes, Modelling
Keywords: Numerical model, Particle tracking

The content was (partly) adapted by AI
Content (partly) adapted by AI

In a groundbreaking experiment conducted on August 10, 1928, Paul Louis Mercanton and his team deposited artillery shells, akin to time capsules, on the accumulation zone of the Rhône Glacier. This bold initiative aimed to provide future glaciologists with physical markers to study the glacier’s long-term flow dynamics. These “messages in a glacier,” as Mercanton described them, were expected to journey slowly through the ice, eventually emerging decades or even centuries later, offering unique insights into subglacial motion and ice deformation. When reporting his experiment, Mercanton estimated that the shells would “reappear between 2110 and 2170” at the glacier’s tongue. Nearly a century later, rapid glacier retreat driven by climate change raises intriguing questions that modern simulation techniques are uniquely poised to address: Where are Mercanton’s shells now? When will they reappear on the glacier’s surface? How accurate were Mercanton’s initial predictions? This work revisits Mercanton’s visionary experiment in light of modern ice flow modeling. Combining historical insights with the glacier evolution model IGM, we explore hypothesis about the fate of these buried artifacts and the evolving dynamics of the Rhône Glacier under different climate trajectories, and assess the estimate of Mercanton given his unawareness of climate warming.

NAME:
Small Lecture Room
BUILDING:
Ágnes‐Heller‐Haus
FLOOR:
0
TYPE:
Lecture Hall
CAPACITY:
200
ACCESS:
Only Participants
ADDITIONAL:
TBA
FIND ME:
>> Google Maps

Limits: min. 3 words, max. 30 words or 200 characters

Choose the session you want to submit an abstract. Please be assured that similar sessions will either be scheduled consecutively or merged once the abstract submission phase is completed.

Select your preferred presentation mode
Please visit the session format page to get a detailed view on the presentation timings
The final decision on oral/poster is made by the (Co-)Conveners and will be communicated via your My#IMC dashboard

Please add here your abstract meeting the following requirements:
NO REFERNCES/KEYWORDS/ACKNOWEDGEMENTS IN AN ABSTRACT!
Limits: min 100 words, max 350 words or 2500 characters incl. tabs
Criteria: use only UTF-8 HTML character set, no equations/special characters/coding
Copy/Paste from an external editor is possible but check/reformat your text before submitting (e.g. bullet points, returns, aso)

Add here affiliations (max. 30) for you and your co-author(s). Use the row number to assign the affiliation to you and your co-author(s).
When you hover over the row number you are able to change the order of the affiliation list.

1
1

Add here co-author(s) (max. 30) to your abstract. Please assign the affiliation(s) of each co-author in the "Assigned Aff. No" by using the corresponding numbers from the "Affiliation List" (e.g.: 1,2,...)
When you hover over the row number you are able to change the order of the co-author list.

1
1
1
2
1
Close