Intercomparison of gauge based, reanalysis and satellite gridded precipitation datasets in High Mountain Asia: insights from observations and runoff data.

Abstract ID: 28.7289 | Accepted as Poster | Poster | 2025-02-27 13:00 - 14:30 | Ágnes‐Heller‐Haus/Small Lecture Room

Alessia Spezza (0)
Diolaiuti, Guglielmina Adele (1), Fugazza, Davide (1), Manara, Veronica (1), Maugeri, Maurizio (1)
Alessia Spezza (1)
Diolaiuti, Guglielmina Adele (1), Fugazza, Davide (1), Manara, Veronica (1), Maugeri, Maurizio (1)

1
(1) University of Milan, Via Celoria 10, Milan, 20133, Italy.

(1) University of Milan, Via Celoria 10, Milan, 20133, Italy.

Categories: Glacier-Climate Interactions
Keywords: Precipitation datasets, High Mountain Asia, Runoff, Observational data

Categories: Glacier-Climate Interactions
Keywords: Precipitation datasets, High Mountain Asia, Runoff, Observational data

The Tibetan Plateau and the adjacent mountain ranges are known as the “Third Pole” because they hold the third largest frozen water reserve in the world after the polar regions, with a glacial volume of about 7000 km3. This region plays a vital role in supplying water to nearly 2 billion people through rivers like the Indus, Ganges, Brahmaputra, Yangtze, and Yellow River. Accurate precipitation data are essential for understanding hydrological processes in high mountain basins. However, in many mountainous areas, precipitation gauges are either sparse or absent due to the challenging environmental conditions. Moreover, the available precipitation gauges are often located in valleys and they are not adequate to represent the diverse topography of the territory. This underlines a significant gap in the existing precipitation datasets, since precipitation at high elevations is likely considerably underestimated. In this study, we aim to address these challenges by analyzing an extensive area of High Mountain Asia (70°-100°E for longitude and 25°-40° N for latitude). Specifically, we examined two reanalysis datasets (ERA5 and HAR), two gauge-based datasets (GPCC and Aphrodite), and one satellite-derived dataset (PERSIANN) to evaluate their performance in capturing precipitation patterns. At first, we compared the different datasets over the common period (1983-2007) evaluating their ability to reproduce the precipitation spatial distribution both at annual and seasonal level. Then, due to the discrepancies in precipitation values over the area, particularly influenced by the complex orography, we decided to compare the datasets with the observational data available from the Copernicus Data Store (Global Land Surface Atmospheric Variables dataset, 1755–2020) and the runoff data provided by the GRDC (Global Runoff Data Centre) dataset as a reference. When comparing gauge-based datasets with the observational data, there is consistency, whereas the other datasets tend to exhibit higher precipitation especially in areas with greater topographic complexity. To compare precipitation values with the measured river flow, the total evaporation from the ERA5-Land dataset was taken into account to improve the estimates. The results indicate that reanalysis datasets are the most effective in simulating the hydrological balance while the gauge-based and the satellite datasets significantly underestimate precipitation. These results are essential for improving the estimation of glacier accumulation and, consequently, glacier melt, which is necessary to assess the runoff contribution to the major basins in High Mountain Asia.

NAME:
Small Lecture Room
BUILDING:
Ágnes‐Heller‐Haus
FLOOR:
0
TYPE:
Lecture Hall
CAPACITY:
200
ACCESS:
Only Participants
ADDITIONAL:
TBA
FIND ME:
>> Google Maps

Limits: min. 3 words, max. 30 words or 200 characters

Choose the session you want to submit an abstract. Please be assured that similar sessions will either be scheduled consecutively or merged once the abstract submission phase is completed.

Select your preferred presentation mode
Please visit the session format page to get a detailed view on the presentation timings
The final decision on oral/poster is made by the (Co-)Conveners and will be communicated via your My#IMC dashboard

Please add here your abstract meeting the following requirements:
NO REFERNCES/KEYWORDS/ACKNOWEDGEMENTS IN AN ABSTRACT!
Limits: min 100 words, max 350 words or 2500 characters incl. tabs
Criteria: use only UTF-8 HTML character set, no equations/special characters/coding
Copy/Paste from an external editor is possible but check/reformat your text before submitting (e.g. bullet points, returns, aso)

Add here affiliations (max. 30) for you and your co-author(s). Use the row number to assign the affiliation to you and your co-author(s).
When you hover over the row number you are able to change the order of the affiliation list.

1
1

Add here co-author(s) (max. 30) to your abstract. Please assign the affiliation(s) of each co-author in the "Assigned Aff. No" by using the corresponding numbers from the "Affiliation List" (e.g.: 1,2,...)
When you hover over the row number you are able to change the order of the co-author list.

1
2
3
4
1
1
2
3
4
1
Close