Constraining a damage model from the artificial drainage of the Tête Rousse water-filled cavity

Abstract ID: 28.7283 | Withdrawn | Requested as: Talk | TBA | TBA

Julien Brondex (1)
Olivier, Gagliardini (2); Adrien, Gilbert (2)

(1) Institut des Géosciences de l'Environnement (IGE), 70 rue de la physique, 38400 Saint Martin D'Hères, FR
(2) Univ. Grenoble Alpes, CNRS, IRD, IGE, F-38000 Grenoble, France

Categories: Cryospheric Processes, Modelling
Keywords: Crevasses, Elasticity, Viscosity, Damage

Categories: Cryospheric Processes, Modelling
Keywords: Crevasses, Elasticity, Viscosity, Damage

Abstract

Crevasses are critical components of the cryo-hydrologic system. The Continuum Damage Mechanics (CDM) framework has emerged as a promising approach for modeling crevasse fields. However, its application relies on poorly constrained parameters, such as the critical stress threshold, and by the lack of consensus on appropriate stress invariants that should be considered for fracture initiation (the so-called damage criterion). Studies based on observations notably face uncertainties in converting observed strain or strain rate into stress estimates. In this study, we use a carefully monitored artificial drainage event of a water-filled cavity on the Tête Rousse Glacier in 2010 to investigate fracture initiation processes, focusing on refining damage criteria and stress thresholds. Using the finite element code Elmer/Ice, we simulate the drainage and subsequent refilling of the cavity over three consecutive years. The simulated stress distributions are compared to a field of circular crevasses that were mapped around the cavity during the summer following the first drainage operation. Our results show that stress patterns derived from a non-linear viscous mechanical response (i.e., Glen’s flow law with n = 3) better match observed crevasse fields than those assuming a linear viscous or a linear elastic mechanical behavior. Furthermore, by evaluating four commonly used damage criteria in glaciology-related applications —maximum principal stress, von Mises, Hayhurst, and Coulomb— we show that the maximum principal stress criterion, paired with a stress threshold of approximately 100 to 130 kPa, provides the best reproduction of the observed crevasse field.

Choose the session you want to submit an abstract. Please be assured that similar sessions will either be scheduled consecutively or merged once the abstract submission phase is completed.

Select your preferred presentation mode
Please visit the session format page to get a detailed view on the presentation timings
The final decision on oral/poster is made by the (Co-)Conveners and will be communicated via your My#IMC dashboard

Please add here your abstract meeting the following requirements:
NO REFERNCES/KEYWORDS/ACKNOWEDGEMENTS IN AN ABSTRACT!
Limits: min 100 words, max 350 words or 2500 characters incl. tabs
Criteria: use only UTF-8 HTML character set, no equations/special characters/coding
Copy/Paste from an external editor is possible but check/reformat your text before submitting (e.g. bullet points, returns, aso)

Add here affiliations (max. 30) for you and your co-author(s). Use the row number to assign the affiliation to you and your co-author(s).
When you hover over the row number you are able to change the order of the affiliation list.

1
2
1

Add here co-author(s) (max. 30) to your abstract. Please assign the affiliation(s) of each co-author in the "Assigned Aff. No" by using the corresponding numbers from the "Affiliation List" (e.g.: 1,2,...)
When you hover over the row number you are able to change the order of the co-author list.

1
2
1
1
2
3
4
1
Close