Evaluation and Comparison of Mass Balance Methods on the Rutor Glacier (Aosta Valley, Italy)

Abstract ID: 3.11915 | Accepted as Poster | Poster | TBA | TBA

Federico Grosso (0)
Pogliotti, Paolo (1), Morra di Cella, Umberto (1), Isabellon, Michel (2)
Federico Grosso (1)
Pogliotti, Paolo (1), Morra di Cella, Umberto (1), Isabellon, Michel (2)

1
(1) Environmental Protection Agency of Aosta Valley (ARPA VdA), Loc. La Maladière 48 11020 Saint Christophe, Italy
(2) CIMA Research Foundation, Via A. Magliotto, 2 17100 Savona - Italy

(1) Environmental Protection Agency of Aosta Valley (ARPA VdA), Loc. La Maladière 48 11020 Saint Christophe, Italy
(2) CIMA Research Foundation, Via A. Magliotto, 2 17100 Savona - Italy

Categories: Cryo- & Hydrosphere
Keywords: Glaciological mass balance, comparative analysis, glaciological and geodetic, Difference of DEM, combining complementary techniques

Categories: Cryo- & Hydrosphere
Keywords: Glaciological mass balance, comparative analysis, glaciological and geodetic, Difference of DEM, combining complementary techniques

The content was (partly) adapted by AI
Content (partly) adapted by AI

The Rutor Glacier, one of the largest in the Aosta Valley, Italy, has been extensively monitored over the last few decades. This study presents a comparative analysis of glaciological and geodetic mass balance methods for the period 2008–2024, aimed at evaluating the transition from a purely glaciological to a purely geodetic approach and assessing the consistency of the historical mass balance series by examining differences in cumulative mass balance. Glaciological mass balance measurements from 2005 to 2019 were conducted using direct measurements of snow depth and density at the end of winter and ice melt using stakes and residual snow at the end of summer. From 2020 to 2024, a hybrid approach was adopted, combining a predominantly glaciological method for the accumulation area—ensuring precise estimates of snow density—with a geodetic method for the ablation area to obtain accurate and spatialized estimates of ice volume changes by using Difference of DEM (DoD). Thanks to the availability of DEMs and a historical mass balance dataset, starting from 2005, this study aims to compare the cumulative mass balance data derived from both approaches. The 2008 DEM, produced using LiDAR technology with a ground resolution of 2 meters, and the 2024 DEM, obtained from aerial surveys with a 0.5-meter resolution, were coregistered to ensure accurate alignment. The calculation of the DEM difference allows for a more precise estimation of volume changes over the 16-year period. The study aims to assess the consistency of the historical mass balance data series by analyzing differences in cumulative balance between the two approaches: the glaciological approach, which divides the glacier surface into areas with homogeneous behavior, and the geodetic approach, applied to a single area covering the entire glacier. This integrated approach emphasizes the strengths and limitations of each method and highlights the importance of combining complementary techniques for accurate glacier monitoring. The findings contribute to ongoing efforts to improve mass balance assessment methods and enhance the understanding of glacier dynamics in the face of climate change.

N/A
NAME:
TBA
BUILDING:
TBA
FLOOR:
TBA
TYPE:
TBA
CAPACITY:
TBA
ACCESS:
TBA
ADDITIONAL:
TBA
FIND ME:
>> Google Maps

Limits: min. 3 words, max. 30 words or 200 characters

Choose the session you want to submit an abstract. Please be assured that similar sessions will either be scheduled consecutively or merged once the abstract submission phase is completed.

Select your preferred presentation mode
Please visit the session format page to get a detailed view on the presentation timings
The final decision on oral/poster is made by the (Co-)Conveners and will be communicated via your My#IMC dashboard

Please add here your abstract meeting the following requirements:
NO REFERNCES/KEYWORDS/ACKNOWEDGEMENTS IN AN ABSTRACT!
Limits: min 100 words, max 350 words or 2500 characters incl. tabs
Criteria: use only UTF-8 HTML character set, no equations/special characters/coding
Copy/Paste from an external editor is possible but check/reformat your text before submitting (e.g. bullet points, returns, aso)

Add here affiliations (max. 30) for you and your co-author(s). Use the row number to assign the affiliation to you and your co-author(s).
When you hover over the row number you are able to change the order of the affiliation list.

1
2
1

Add here co-author(s) (max. 30) to your abstract. Please assign the affiliation(s) of each co-author in the "Assigned Aff. No" by using the corresponding numbers from the "Affiliation List" (e.g.: 1,2,...)
When you hover over the row number you are able to change the order of the co-author list.

1
2
3
1
1
2
3
4
5
1
Close