The impact of drought on carbonyl sulfide and CO2 fluxes in P. sylvestris and J. communis

Abstract ID: 3.10720 | Accepted as Talk | Talk/Oral | TBA | TBA

Anna De Vries (0)
Spielmann, Felix (1), Wohlfahrt, Georg (1), Schmack, Judith (2), Jud, Werner (2), Karl, Thomas (2), Schnitzler, Jörg-Peter (3), Winkler, Jana Barbro (3)
Anna De Vries (1)
Spielmann, Felix (1), Wohlfahrt, Georg (1), Schmack, Judith (2), Jud, Werner (2), Karl, Thomas (2), Schnitzler, Jörg-Peter (3), Winkler, Jana Barbro (3)

1
(1) University of Innsbruck, Sternwartestraße 15, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria
(2) University of Innsbruck, Innrain 52f, 6020, Innsbruck, Austria
(3) Helmholtz Zentrum München, Landstraße, D-85764, Neuherberg, Germany

(1) University of Innsbruck, Sternwartestraße 15, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria
(2) University of Innsbruck, Innrain 52f, 6020, Innsbruck, Austria
(3) Helmholtz Zentrum München, Landstraße, D-85764, Neuherberg, Germany

Categories: ES-Forests
Keywords: drought, GPP, Carbonyl sulfide

Categories: ES-Forests
Keywords: drought, GPP, Carbonyl sulfide

Gross primary productivity (GPP) is a key driver of the current net land carbon sink. However, climate change—along with the increasing frequency of extreme events—may significantly alter GPP, particularly in mountain regions, which are very vulnerable to extreme events like drought. Understanding how the GPP responds to droughts in mountain regions is therefore crucial. Since GPP cannot be measured directly, it must be inferred via proxies or modelling, introducing substantial uncertainties, which limit the ability to predict GPP responses to climate change driven stressors such as drought. A promising proxy of GPP are measurements of carbonyl sulfide (COS) fluxes, as COS is taken up by plants in parallel to CO2 but in contrast to the latter generally not emitted. In this study, we measured COS and CO₂ fluxes of two woody mountain species, Pinus sylvestris and Juniperus communis, under controlled and varying drought conditions (soil water content ranging from 40 % to 2 %). As water stress intensified, the uptake of both COS and CO₂ declined due to reductions in stomatal conductance. These flux responses to drought were of greater magnitude in P. sylvestris than in J. communis. Interestingly, diurnal variations in GPP and autotrophic respiration were more pronounced in semi-stressed plants, which regulated stomatal conductance and closure following an optimality principle, compared to heavily stressed or control groups. The CO₂ uptake velocity decreased more rapidly than COS uptake under increasing stress in both species due to the increasing biochemical limitations of photosynthesis. The main driver of the diurnal cycle of the COS and CO2 exchange was PAR in both species and all stress levels but with increasing light saturation points as drought intensified. Daily means were mostly driven by the water availability. This study provides valuable insights into how mountain species respond to drought stress, improving our understanding of GPP dynamics under extreme conditions, essential for refining carbon cycle models and improving predictions on the impacts of climate change on terrestrial carbon sinks.

N/A
NAME:
TBA
BUILDING:
TBA
FLOOR:
TBA
TYPE:
TBA
CAPACITY:
TBA
ACCESS:
TBA
ADDITIONAL:
TBA
FIND ME:
>> Google Maps

Limits: min. 3 words, max. 30 words or 200 characters

Choose the session you want to submit an abstract. Please be assured that similar sessions will either be scheduled consecutively or merged once the abstract submission phase is completed.

Select your preferred presentation mode
Please visit the session format page to get a detailed view on the presentation timings
The final decision on oral/poster is made by the (Co-)Conveners and will be communicated via your My#IMC dashboard

Please add here your abstract meeting the following requirements:
NO REFERNCES/KEYWORDS/ACKNOWEDGEMENTS IN AN ABSTRACT!
Limits: min 100 words, max 350 words or 2500 characters incl. tabs
Criteria: use only UTF-8 HTML character set, no equations/special characters/coding
Copy/Paste from an external editor is possible but check/reformat your text before submitting (e.g. bullet points, returns, aso)

Add here affiliations (max. 30) for you and your co-author(s). Use the row number to assign the affiliation to you and your co-author(s).
When you hover over the row number you are able to change the order of the affiliation list.

1
2
3
1

Add here co-author(s) (max. 30) to your abstract. Please assign the affiliation(s) of each co-author in the "Assigned Aff. No" by using the corresponding numbers from the "Affiliation List" (e.g.: 1,2,...)
When you hover over the row number you are able to change the order of the co-author list.

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
1
1
2
3
1
Close