Regeneration and stand stability in mountain protective forests: Insights from a four-decade experiment

Abstract ID: 3.10651 | Accepted as Talk | Talk | TBA | TBA

Alessandra Bottero (0)
Forrester, David I. (1), Glatthorn, Jonas (2), Gratzer, Georg (3), Lebedicker, Anja (4), Nitzsche, Jens (2), Scheidl, Christian (3), Schmid, Hubert (2), Simon, Alois (3), Temperli, Christian (2), Zimmermann, Stephan (2)
Alessandra Bottero ((0) WSL Institute for Snow and Avalanche Research SLF, Flüelastrasse 11, 7260, Davos Dorf, GR, CH)
Forrester, David I. (1), Glatthorn, Jonas (2), Gratzer, Georg (3), Lebedicker, Anja (4), Nitzsche, Jens (2), Scheidl, Christian (3), Schmid, Hubert (2), Simon, Alois (3), Temperli, Christian (2), Zimmermann, Stephan (2)

(0) WSL Institute for Snow and Avalanche Research SLF, Flüelastrasse 11, 7260, Davos Dorf, GR, CH
(1) Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO) Environment, Canberra, Australia
(2) Swiss Federal Institute for Forest Snow and Landscape Research WSL, Birmensdorf, Switzerland
(3) University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Vienna, Austria
(4) Office for Forests and Game Hunting, Canton Zug, Zug, Switzerland

(1) Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO) Environment, Canberra, Australia
(2) Swiss Federal Institute for Forest Snow and Landscape Research WSL, Birmensdorf, Switzerland
(3) University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Vienna, Austria
(4) Office for Forests and Game Hunting, Canton Zug, Zug, Switzerland

Categories: Adaptation, Ecosystems, ES-Forests, Hazards
Keywords: Avalanche, Forest management, Natural disturbance, Resilience, Rockfall

Categories: Adaptation, Ecosystems, ES-Forests, Hazards
Keywords: Avalanche, Forest management, Natural disturbance, Resilience, Rockfall

Conifer forests at high elevations are often naturally monospecific, yet their stability is increasingly threatened by abiotic and biotic disturbances. Pure, even-aged stands, which are often dense and structurally uniform, are particularly vulnerable, though their stability is crucial to maintain protection against natural hazards. Understanding how natural regeneration and stand structure respond to environmental conditions and management is essential for predicting future forest dynamics and ecosystem services.
This study presents findings from a long-term experiment established in the 1980s in mature Norway spruce-dominated protective forests spanning montane and subalpine zones in Switzerland and Liechtenstein. The composition of the studied stands is typical for the Alpine region. The experiment aimed to assess how stand structure and regeneration dynamics respond to thinning. Each site included control stands with no intervention and one to two treatment stands with different thinning intensities. Stand structure has been repeatedly surveyed since the late 1980s. Regeneration was initially assessed in the early 2000s, with a reassessment in 2023, following a permanent grid system.
Four decades after thinning, stands exhibited structural characteristics that may enhance long-term stability compared to controls, although trade-offs may exist with resistance to disturbances and protective effect against natural hazards in the short term. Regeneration densities and species diversity increased following thinning, with variation across sites driven by topography, environmental conditions, and browsing pressure. Our results suggest that thinning-induced shifts in stand structure influence competitive interactions and resource availability, affecting regeneration dynamics and the capacity of these forests to recover from disturbance and provide critical ecosystem services.
Our findings contribute to a better understanding of how thinning as a management approach can enhance structural complexity and regeneration diversity in high-elevation protective forests, influencing their long-term stability and capacity to reduce natural hazard risks. These insights are relevant for the development of management strategies to strengthen forests’ protective functions under climate change.

N/A
NAME:
TBA
BUILDING:
TBA
FLOOR:
TBA
TYPE:
TBA
CAPACITY:
TBA
ACCESS:
TBA
ADDITIONAL:
TBA
FIND ME:
>> Google Maps

Limits: min. 3 words, max. 30 words or 200 characters

Choose the session you want to submit an abstract. Please be assured that similar sessions will either be scheduled consecutively or merged once the abstract submission phase is completed.

Select your preferred presentation mode
Please visit the session format page to get a detailed view on the presentation timings
The final decision on oral/poster is made by the (Co-)Conveners and will be communicated via your My#IMC dashboard

Please add here your abstract meeting the following requirements:
NO REFERNCES/KEYWORDS/ACKNOWEDGEMENTS IN AN ABSTRACT!
Limits: min 100 words, max 350 words or 2500 characters incl. tabs
Criteria: use only UTF-8 HTML character set, no equations/special characters/coding
Copy/Paste from an external editor is possible but check/reformat your text before submitting (e.g. bullet points, returns, aso)

Add here affiliations (max. 30) for you and your co-author(s). Use the row number to assign the affiliation to you and your co-author(s).
When you hover over the row number you are able to change the order of the affiliation list.

1
2
3
4
1

Add here co-author(s) (max. 30) to your abstract. Please assign the affiliation(s) of each co-author in the "Assigned Aff. No" by using the corresponding numbers from the "Affiliation List" (e.g.: 1,2,...)
When you hover over the row number you are able to change the order of the co-author list.

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
1
1
2
3
4
5
1
Close