Dynamics of natural regeneration following the 2006 windstorm in the mountain forests of the Slovenian Alps

Abstract ID: 3.10431 | Accepted as Talk | Talk/Oral | TBA | TBA

Aleš Poljanec (0)
Trifković, Vasilije (1), Bončina, Andrej (1), Sever, Kristina, Nève Repe, Andreja, Klopčič, Matija (1)
Aleš Poljanec ((0) Slovenia Forest Service, Vecna pot 2, 1000, Ljubljana, Slovenia, SI)
Trifković, Vasilije (1), Bončina, Andrej (1), Sever, Kristina, Nève Repe, Andreja, Klopčič, Matija (1)

(0) Slovenia Forest Service, Vecna pot 2, 1000, Ljubljana, Slovenia, SI
(1) Department of Forestry and Renewable Forest Resources, Biotechnical Faculty, University of Ljubljana, Večna pot 83, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia

(1) Department of Forestry and Renewable Forest Resources, Biotechnical Faculty, University of Ljubljana, Večna pot 83, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia

Categories: ES-Forests
Keywords: natural disturbance, forest recovery, regeneration dynamics, Tobit model, tree species composition

Categories: ES-Forests
Keywords: natural disturbance, forest recovery, regeneration dynamics, Tobit model, tree species composition

Natural disturbances play a major role in the dynamics of forest structure and composition. For close-to-nature silviculture understanding the resilience to and recovery after devastating natural disturbances is crucial. In 2006 a severe windstorm damaged 160 ha of mature pure secondary Picea abies stands in the Julian Alps growing in sites with the potential natural forest vegetation of Fagus sylvatica, Picea abies and Abies alba with admixture of some minor tree species. On the 125 ha of totally damaged forest a systematic grid of 81 permanent plots (size of each 4 × 4 m; grid 100 × 200 m) was established for a long-term monitoring of tree species regeneration dynamics (i.e. regeneration density, tree species composition, height structure, and browsing damage). Four consecutive inventories of natural regeneration were conducted between 2008 and 2025. To identify predictors of occurrence and abundance of natural regeneration the Tobit censored regression model were developed, the independent variables being various site and stand parameters (i. e. inclination, microrelief, soil type, canopy closure, distance to stand edge). In the observed period significant changes in the abundance of natural regeneration and its tree species composition are evident. The proportion of Norway spruce in natural regeneration has declined, while the proportion of light-demanding broadleaved tree species (Acer pseudoplatanus and Sorbus aucuparia) has increased. Browsing pressure, particularly on Abies alba and Sorbus aucuparia, negative affected regeneration dynamics. Our findings provide an insight into forest recovery after a large-scale high-severity disturbance and have direct implications for close-to-nature and multipurpose forest management of mountain forests. The study was partially funded by the JeloviZA, SOILOurInvisibleAlly and MOSAIC projects.

N/A
NAME:
TBA
BUILDING:
TBA
FLOOR:
TBA
TYPE:
TBA
CAPACITY:
TBA
ACCESS:
TBA
ADDITIONAL:
TBA
FIND ME:
>> Google Maps

Limits: min. 3 words, max. 30 words or 200 characters

Choose the session you want to submit an abstract. Please be assured that similar sessions will either be scheduled consecutively or merged once the abstract submission phase is completed.

Select your preferred presentation mode
Please visit the session format page to get a detailed view on the presentation timings
The final decision on oral/poster is made by the (Co-)Conveners and will be communicated via your My#IMC dashboard

Please add here your abstract meeting the following requirements:
NO REFERNCES/KEYWORDS/ACKNOWEDGEMENTS IN AN ABSTRACT!
Limits: min 100 words, max 350 words or 2500 characters incl. tabs
Criteria: use only UTF-8 HTML character set, no equations/special characters/coding
Copy/Paste from an external editor is possible but check/reformat your text before submitting (e.g. bullet points, returns, aso)

Add here affiliations (max. 30) for you and your co-author(s). Use the row number to assign the affiliation to you and your co-author(s).
When you hover over the row number you are able to change the order of the affiliation list.

1
1

Add here co-author(s) (max. 30) to your abstract. Please assign the affiliation(s) of each co-author in the "Assigned Aff. No" by using the corresponding numbers from the "Affiliation List" (e.g.: 1,2,...)
When you hover over the row number you are able to change the order of the co-author list.

1
2
3
4
5
1
1
2
3
4
5
1
Close