Spatiotemporal forecasting of snow water equivalent: the potential of hybrid machine learning models

Abstract ID: 3.10268 | Accepted as Talk | Talk/Oral | TBA | TBA

Oriol Pomarol Moya (0)
Nussbaum, Madlene (1), Mehrkanoon, Siamak (2), Kraaijenbrink, Philip (1), Gouttevin, Isabelle (3), Karssenberg, Derek (1), Immerzeel, Walter W. (1)
Oriol Pomarol Moya (1)
Nussbaum, Madlene (1), Mehrkanoon, Siamak (2), Kraaijenbrink, Philip (1), Gouttevin, Isabelle (3), Karssenberg, Derek (1), Immerzeel, Walter W. (1)

1
(1) Department of Physical Geography, Faculty of Geosciences, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
(2) Department of Information and Computing Sciences, Faculty of Science, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
(3) Univ. Grenoble Alpes, Université de Toulouse, Météo-France, CNRS, CNRM, Centre d'Études de la Neige, Grenoble, France

(1) Department of Physical Geography, Faculty of Geosciences, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
(2) Department of Information and Computing Sciences, Faculty of Science, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
(3) Univ. Grenoble Alpes, Université de Toulouse, Météo-France, CNRS, CNRM, Centre d'Études de la Neige, Grenoble, France

Categories: Cryo- & Hydrosphere
Keywords: Machine Learning, Snow Water Equivalent, Hybrid modelling

Categories: Cryo- & Hydrosphere
Keywords: Machine Learning, Snow Water Equivalent, Hybrid modelling

The content was (partly) adapted by AI
Content (partly) adapted by AI

Snow water equivalent (SWE) is a crucial component of mountain hydrology but still faces large uncertainties in its quantification due to its high temporal and spatial variability. While machine learning (ML) has been applied to similar domains with notable results, its use for SWE prediction has been hindered by the quality, quantity and extent of the measured data. Hybrid models that integrate simulated data from physics-based models with ML have shown promising results in data-scarce scenarios. A comparison of hybrid models was performed, targeting temporal and spatial extrapolation of SWE. Crocus snow model simulations were used together with data from ten meteorological and snow observation stations throughout the northern hemisphere containing 7-20 years of data. Two main setups were tested; a common post-processor approach, where the outputs and state variables from Crocus were fed as additional predictors to the ML model at each time step, and a data augmentation approach, where Crocus simulations for stations at which no measurements are available were used as additional training points. The results show that the post-processor approach is best suited for predicting SWE in years excluded during training. However, when predicting in left-out stations, the data augmentation setup achieved the largest increase in performance, reducing the root mean squared error by 22% compared to Crocus and by 42% compared to a measurement-based ML model. A feature importance analysis reveals that the hybrid model predictions are most influenced by physically-sound variables, such as incoming radiation, current SWE status, air temperature and snowfall. After proving the ability of hybrid models for predicting SWE under data-scarce conditions, ongoing work will further assess their robustness and applicability on an extensive dataset covering the northern hemisphere.

N/A
NAME:
TBA
BUILDING:
TBA
FLOOR:
TBA
TYPE:
TBA
CAPACITY:
TBA
ACCESS:
TBA
ADDITIONAL:
TBA
FIND ME:
>> Google Maps

Limits: min. 3 words, max. 30 words or 200 characters

Choose the session you want to submit an abstract. Please be assured that similar sessions will either be scheduled consecutively or merged once the abstract submission phase is completed.

Select your preferred presentation mode
Please visit the session format page to get a detailed view on the presentation timings
The final decision on oral/poster is made by the (Co-)Conveners and will be communicated via your My#IMC dashboard

Please add here your abstract meeting the following requirements:
NO REFERNCES/KEYWORDS/ACKNOWEDGEMENTS IN AN ABSTRACT!
Limits: min 100 words, max 350 words or 2500 characters incl. tabs
Criteria: use only UTF-8 HTML character set, no equations/special characters/coding
Copy/Paste from an external editor is possible but check/reformat your text before submitting (e.g. bullet points, returns, aso)

Add here affiliations (max. 30) for you and your co-author(s). Use the row number to assign the affiliation to you and your co-author(s).
When you hover over the row number you are able to change the order of the affiliation list.

1
2
3
1

Add here co-author(s) (max. 30) to your abstract. Please assign the affiliation(s) of each co-author in the "Assigned Aff. No" by using the corresponding numbers from the "Affiliation List" (e.g.: 1,2,...)
When you hover over the row number you are able to change the order of the co-author list.

1
2
3
4
5
6
1
1
2
3
1
Close