Tracking ecotones on aerial images with computer vision in a mountain forest landscape

Abstract ID: 3.10267 | Accepted as Talk | Talk/Oral | TBA | TBA

Michael Maroschek (0)
Seidl, Rupert (1,2), Rammer, Werner (2)
Michael Maroschek (1, 2)
Seidl, Rupert (1,2), Rammer, Werner (2)

1, 2
(1) Berchtesgaden National Park, Doktorberg 6, 83471, Berchtesgaden, Germany
(2) Technical University of Munich, TUM School of Life Sciences, Ecosystem Dynamics and Forest Management, Hans-Carl-von-Carlowitz-Platz 2, 85354, Freising, Germany

(1) Berchtesgaden National Park, Doktorberg 6, 83471, Berchtesgaden, Germany
(2) Technical University of Munich, TUM School of Life Sciences, Ecosystem Dynamics and Forest Management, Hans-Carl-von-Carlowitz-Platz 2, 85354, Freising, Germany

Categories: Ecosystems, ES-Forests, Remote Sensing
Keywords: treeline, orthophoto, protected area, remote sensing, artificial intelligence

Categories: Ecosystems, ES-Forests, Remote Sensing
Keywords: treeline, orthophoto, protected area, remote sensing, artificial intelligence

The content was (partly) adapted by AI
Content (partly) adapted by AI

Mountain forest ecosystems are sensitive to global change. Especially at the ecotones we often expect high sensitivity to changes in climate, disturbance regimes or land use. The advent of machine learning, specifically computer vision, provides powerful tools to investigate ecotones across extended spatiotemporal extents using remote sensing data. Here, we focused on the spatiotemporal development of the treeline and montane-subalpine forest ecotones in a protected area in the European Alps. First, we aimed to identify trees and shrubs on aerial images, with special attention to integrating multiple sensor types into one computer vision framework. Second, we mapped a) the montane forest zone, b) the subalpine forest zone, and c) the krummholz zone, as well as d) the ecotones in between. Third, we investigated the spatiotemporal changes occurring in the vegetation zones and the ecotones. We based our analysis on aerial images of Berchtesgaden National Park covering nine time steps from 1953 to 2020. The images were captured through analog (panchromatic, color infrared) and digital (color infrared, RGB) cameras. To generate training data, we manually interpreted randomly distributed 0.5 ha scenes across all time steps, resulting in >110,000 annotations of trees, shrubs, and standing dead trees. We tested a set of instance segmentation frameworks and compared individual models for each image type with models integrating all image types. We used the inference of the best performing model to generate wall-to-wall tree maps. Using structure and composition of the tree maps, we delineated zones and ecotones and tracked changes over time. We found that a combined computer vision model for all image types performed better than individual models for each image type. While the extent of montane and subalpine forest zones changed over time, krummholz was notably stable. Conversely, crown cover increased more strongly for krummholz and the subalpine zone than for the montane zone. Although we did not find a general pattern of ecotones shifting upward, we observed remarkable local upward shifts. On average, the upward shift of the montane-subalpine ecotone was roughly two times faster than the subalpine-alpine ecotone, decreasing the subalpine forest area by approximately 25% over 67 years.

N/A
NAME:
TBA
BUILDING:
TBA
FLOOR:
TBA
TYPE:
TBA
CAPACITY:
TBA
ACCESS:
TBA
ADDITIONAL:
TBA
FIND ME:
>> Google Maps

Limits: min. 3 words, max. 30 words or 200 characters

Choose the session you want to submit an abstract. Please be assured that similar sessions will either be scheduled consecutively or merged once the abstract submission phase is completed.

Select your preferred presentation mode
Please visit the session format page to get a detailed view on the presentation timings
The final decision on oral/poster is made by the (Co-)Conveners and will be communicated via your My#IMC dashboard

Please add here your abstract meeting the following requirements:
NO REFERNCES/KEYWORDS/ACKNOWEDGEMENTS IN AN ABSTRACT!
Limits: min 100 words, max 350 words or 2500 characters incl. tabs
Criteria: use only UTF-8 HTML character set, no equations/special characters/coding
Copy/Paste from an external editor is possible but check/reformat your text before submitting (e.g. bullet points, returns, aso)

Add here affiliations (max. 30) for you and your co-author(s). Use the row number to assign the affiliation to you and your co-author(s).
When you hover over the row number you are able to change the order of the affiliation list.

1
2
1

Add here co-author(s) (max. 30) to your abstract. Please assign the affiliation(s) of each co-author in the "Assigned Aff. No" by using the corresponding numbers from the "Affiliation List" (e.g.: 1,2,...)
When you hover over the row number you are able to change the order of the co-author list.

1
2
1
1
2
3
4
5
1
Close